Skip to content

Different perspective on weekend matchup

Oct 15, 2009, 7:01 PM EST

I think I’ve read about 3,000 different game previews (which is why I haven’t given you one), but I just stumbled across one that I think is pretty unique.

Football Outsiders is a website with the tagline “Innovative Statistics, Intelligent Analysis,” about –yep, you guessed it — football. I’ve got them in my RSS feed, and always check in on what they’ve got brewing in that big pot of theirs.

Today, their preview of the USC vs. ND matchup was posted over at ESPN, and they had a few interesting points-of-view that I haven’t seen while doing my “research” for the big game. (And by research, I mean web-surfing until my eyes feel like bleeding and my wrists feel like a 65-year-old arthritic carpenters.)

While they had a unique perspective on fairly obvious battles like the red zone, big plays and 1st downs, an even more obvious battle was something that I hadn’t really thought of: field position.

Of all the factors involved in Saturday’s game — battles at the
line of scrimmage, Notre Dame’s stellar passing offense versus USC’s
stout pass defense, etc. — the most important could be one that often
is overlooked: field position.

Obviously, it shouldn’t be
overlooked. Having a punter who can flip the field in your favor with a
booming kick (or, on the flip side, breaking a punt or kickoff return
into opposing territory) can make a huge difference, as can a nice
return on an interception or a huge third-down sack. In college
football, teams that play with a field position advantage win about 66
percent of the time.

Why does field position matter to
Notre Dame in particular Saturday? Because the Irish have not made
things easy on themselves so far this year. They have started drives at
or inside their 30-yard line 63 percent of the time in 2009; the
national average is only 57 percent. This has not stopped their offense
from being effective — they have scored at least 33 points in four of
five games. But they have needed every bit of Jimmy Clausen’s

passing efficiency (first in the nation) to move the ball and score
points. In fact, 12 of Notre Dame’s 19 touchdown drives this season
have taken place on drives of 70 yards or longer. You might get away
with that against Purdue or Washington, but against a USC unit that
will be the best the Fighting Irish have faced this season, repeatedly
getting stuck deep in their own territory is a recipe for disaster.

I’ve railed on the mediocre special teams coverage and punting from Eric Maust, but lost in the coverage of all these incredible games is an obvious, yet astute observation like this.

It seems like Notre Dame has constantly been forced to make long drives down the field, which is another thing that makes Jimmy Clausen’s play so incredible. Likewise, it feels like every punt Golden Tate is back deep to return he ends up fair-catching. While most of the talk on freshman specialists has been focused on kicker Nick Tausch, there is a lot of pressure on the yolked up Ben Turk to get some hang-time and distance on his punts this week. Turk only got two kicks off in his debut, but neither cracked 40 yards. 

For the Irish to win Saturday, they’ll need to finally play a game where they flip the field in their favor.

  1. TLNDMA - Oct 15, 2009 at 9:36 PM

    I’ve thought for a couple games that Tate was fair catching under orders, probably to keep him healthy after floyd went down. I don’t think that will be the case saturday. “Golden Rules”

  2. sharkey - Oct 15, 2009 at 10:21 PM

    one way long drives will help ND, is it will keep ball possesion and time in favor of the Irish. But that only works with a score at the end.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!