Catching up with… Ryan Harris


So “Catching Up” was on a little bit of a bye week.

But we’re coming back with a thunder this week and better late than never. After doing some hunting, I finally tracked down Denver Broncos right tackle Ryan Harris. Ryan is one of my personal favorites — he’s a graduate of both Cretin-Derham Hall and Notre Dame, a very good start — and is the true embodiment of a Notre Dame student athlete.

As Ryan and the undefeated Broncos prepares for a Monday Night Football clash with the San Diego Chargers, you may be surprised how much he’s thinking about another game this weekend as well.


Absolutely. As big as this week is for us, the Broncos, there are a lot of guys, coaches and players, talking about the big SC-Notre Dame game. That’s one of the things coming to the NFL — so many people ask about Notre Dame, it’s one of the first things coaches ask about. Now that the big game is coming up, they’re starting to show clips from my junior year, and it’s just… man. This game is good for college football and just shows you what a wide range of the people that are paying attention to the game. It’s not a bowl game, not a conference final or the SEC Championship or Big 12 Championship, it’s just a game on Notre Dame’s schedule. That speaks to how instrumental Notre Dame is in the world of college football.


The offense is very similar, but the difference is that in the NFL, they blitz every play and you’ve got 16 games against teams that blitz 60 to 80 percent of the time. Beyond the playbook, I think that it’s the preparation to win. We really had that at ND, we felt that we had prepared so well that we were going to win the game because we knew what was going to happen, we knew the other team’s tendencies, the same preparations and points of emphasis we did at Notre Dame are used at the Broncos.


Coach Weis always had a good game plan. He had great game plans, and I honestly don’t know if there’s a better coach in college or the NFL that keeps his players prepared like that. He still shoots us texts, talks to us — he’s always been great about shooting us texts at the beginning of the year or after a big game, he keeps us a part of the family. That’s just another testament to the character of Coach Weis. No one is forgotten and you are a part of the Notre Dame family.


At Cretin, there’s no question that academics are stressed. I remember every time I got a college letter, Coach Scanlan would always say, “make sure you’re getting an education, too.” In school, they’d make sure that no one was treated differently, even if you’re an athlete. I think with the expectations that CDH has for its students, Notre Dame is one of the few colleges that can offer those expectations and a spiritual community while providing the utmost experiences in football and school. That’s why I think Notre Dame is attractive to not just Cretin-Derham athletes, but also Cretin-Derham students. It’s an environment we’re used to.


I’ve met him a couple times and every time he’s been kind, calm, cool, and collected. The thing people forget is that you’re talking about a kid. A 17- or 18-year old young man who really — and this goes for all recruits — who can make that decision at 17? That’s why I think getting them on campus is so good. You can see things for yourself. This is the expectation, this is the environment. You have no idea what 70,000 plus in a stadium feels like. No idea what the facilities are like, what the flight to these places is like. What classrooms, dorm rooms, living by yourself is like. I was fortunate that my parents were helpful and did a great job of guiding me. Seantrel has my best wishes, and of course being an ND alum, I’d love for him to go there, but he’s got to make the right decision for himself.


It was the best place for me. Period. The environment, that community of faith that understands other faiths. I became a better Muslim because of the respect and real genuine faith that’s practiced at Notre Dame. The respect and dialogue you can have with another student who also has faith, that’s a big thing. Prayer is a big thing in Islam, and I wonder that if I went to a state school and said, “Hey guys, before we go to dinner, I’ve got to go back and pray,” who knows what a guy outside of a religious community might say to that. At Notre Dame, it was always like, “Cool, take your time, go ahead and pray.” That understanding helped me be secure in my faith and secure in my practice of faith in everyday life. If I went to a public school, that would’ve been harder to experience.


I never made any money from it, but I get made fun of all the time for it. It’s crazy how many people remember that episode. I look at it as a good experience though, because I learned at a young age that people recognized me just from that show. Learning that wherever  you are that you need to represent yourself the right way in public. A lot of times people — athletes in particular — learn that lesson the hard way. 


As an Irish fan, of course I think it’s an Irish victory. It’s the only way I see it. That’s how Coach Weis is preparing those guys. I almost guarantee he’s preparing those guys to see the victory in the game plan and he’s doing that right now with them. We’ll see what happens, but I really think they can pull it off.   

Only focus after Clemson loss is winning on Saturday

SOUTH BEND, IN - SEPTEMBER 19: Head coach Brian Kelly of the Notre Dame Fighting Irish looks on against the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets in the second quarter at Notre Dame Stadium on September 19, 2015 in South Bend, Indiana. Notre Dame defeated Georgia Tech 30-22. (Photo by Joe Robbins/Getty Images)

The 2015 college football season has yet to showcase a truly great football team. With early title contenders like Ohio State and Michigan State looking less than stellar, Alabama losing a game already and the Pac-12 beating itself up, the chance that a one-loss Notre Dame team could still make it into the College Football Playoff is certainly a possibility.

But don’t expect Brian Kelly and his football team to start worrying about that now.

We saw a similar situation unfold last season, after the Irish lost a heartbreaker in the final seconds against Florida State. With many fans worried that Notre Dame wasn’t given credit for their performance in Tallahassee, the Irish’s playoff resume mattered very little as the team fell apart down the stretch.

As Notre Dame looks forward, their focus only extends to Saturday. That’s when Navy will test the Irish with their triple-option attack and better-than-usual defense, a team that Brian Kelly voted into his Top 25 this week.

Can this team make it to the Playoff? Kelly isn’t sure. But he knows what his team has to do.

“I don’t know,” Kelly said when asked about a one-loss entrance. “But we do know what we can control, and that is winning each week. So what we really talked about is we have no margin for error, and we have to pay attention to every detail.

“Each game is the biggest and most important game we play and really focusing on that. It isn’t concern yourself with big picture. You really have to focus on one week at a time.”

Kelly spread that message to his five captains after the game on Saturday night. He’s optimistic that message has set in over the weekend, and he’ll see how the team practices as they begin their on-field preparations for Navy this afternoon.

But when asked what type of response he wants to see from his team this week, it wasn’t about the minutiae of the week or a company line about daily improvement.

“The response is to win. That’s the response that we’re looking for,” Kelly said, before detailing four major factors to victory. “To win football games, you have to start fast, which we did not. There has to be an attention to detail, which certainly we were missing that at times. We got great effort, and we finished strong. So we were missing two of the four real key components that I’ll be looking for for this weekend. As long as we have those four key components, I’ll take a win by one. That would be fine with me. We need those four key components. That’s what I’ll be looking for.”

Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.