Thoughts on the Presser: Stanford edition


Let’s just say yesterday could’ve been an eventful day, and from the sounds of it, the things that didn’t happen became the event.

Let’s start with the much discussed:

* Charlie Weis didn’t want to talk about the future anymore and just wanted to talk about Stanford.

Firstly I have a news flash. We have a football game this Saturday,
Saturday evening, against Stanford, so let’s see if we can’t talk about
that. Stanford is 7 and 4, they’ve had some very, very big wins this
year, tough football team.

Of course it didn’t stop someone from asking three questions about Jimmy Clausen. I can’t say I blame either party: Weis for not wanting to talk about his star quarterback’s dust-up after what is probably the last game of either his or his quarterback’s collegiate career, or the reporter, for trying to get a quote out of Weis on a fairly large story.

* Once again, the Irish will be without one of their key offensive players. This time it’s Armando Allen, who will likely sit with a cracked bone in his right hand.

Armando cracked a bone in his right hand, and he’s going to get it
fixed today, which will leave him probably out for this game. Probably

While losing Allen for a significant portion of the season has been a tough break, and possibly a big part of the red zone struggles, it looks like Kyle Rudolph is going to try and tough it out and go this Saturday.

He’s practicing today. You know, the thing is he’s cleared to play.
It’s how much pain he’s going to be able to tolerate. So we’ll have to
— we’ll start practicing today, he’ll be out there in individuals and
get going right from the start, and we’ll see how it goes as the week
goes on. But the hope is for him to be able to go at a very non-limited
capacity by Saturday.

It’d be nice to have the chance to see all the offensive players together in the starting lineup. So far this season, it’s only happened once.

* Weis compared Golden Tate to Steve Smith, which is a very nice compliment to give (unless you own him in fantasy football this season).

He reminds me of Steve Smith’s clone. I know Steve Smith well. I’m a
big fan of Steve Smith. A little trash-talker just like Golden. But
their personalities are alike, they’re fiery guys, they make big plays.
They’re tough. They don’t back down from anyone. I would imagine
— I don’t know exactly Steve’s size, but I would imagine it’s probably
pretty close, and he’s done pretty well, last time I checked. He
reminds me a lot of Steve.

Weis also talked about Golden’s diversity, which will serve him well at the next level, and is one of the reason’s I think his draft stock will stay pretty consistent even if people start to nitpick at his game tape.

There have been more than a few people on the internet who have questioned Tate’s route-running, but what’s unquestionable is the strength of his hands, his ability to break tackles and run, and to be an incredibly dangerous weapon with the ball in his hands.

* With Thanksgiving approaching, a reporter took the obvious opportunity to ask Charlie what he’s thankful for.

I’m looking forward to hanging out with Maura, Charlie, Hannah and a
few selected friends and just being able to sit around with the Weis
family on a holiday. How many times in my life have I missed holidays
because of football? Too many. There’s been too many times where you
just missed holidays. You miss a good portion of Christmas, you miss a
good portion of Thanksgiving, you miss Valentine’s Day, which is almost
sacrilegious. But you miss big portions of holidays. The way our
schedule is set up, it’ll give me an opportunity to get home on
Thursday afternoon and just be able to hang out with the family for the
day, and you want to know something, that’s nothing better than that.
Nothing… Nothing.

If there’s a guy that needs a nice afternoon off with his family, it’s Charlie Weis and his staff. Hopefully they all get to kick back, watch some football, have a beer or two, and just enjoy the company.  


Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.



Navy, Notre Dame will display mutual respect with uniforms

Keenan Reynolds, Isaac Rochell

The storied and important history of Notre Dame and Navy’s long-running rivalry will be on display this weekend, with the undefeated Midshipmen coming to South Bend this weekend.

On NBCSN, a half-hour documentary presentation will take a closer look, with “Onward Notre Dame: Mutual Respect” talking about everything from Notre Dame’s 43-year winning streak, to Navy’s revival, triggered by their victory in 2007. The episode will also talk about the rivalries ties to World War II, and how the Navy helped keep Notre Dame alive during wartime.

You can catch it on tonight at 6:30 p.m. ET on NBCSN or online in the same viewing window.

On the field, perhaps an even more unique gesture of respect is planned. With Under Armour the apparel partner for both Notre Dame and Navy, both teams will take the field wearing the same cleats, gloves and baselayers. Each team’s coaching staff will also be outfitted in the same sideline gear.

More from Monday’s press release:

For the first time in college football, two opponents take the field with the exact same Under Armour baselayer, gloves and cleats to pay homage to the storied history and brotherhood between their two schools. The baselayer features both Universities’ alma maters on the sleeves and glove palms with the words “respect, honor, tradition” as a reminder of their connection to each other. Both sidelines and coaches also will wear the same sideline gear as a sign of mutual admiration.​

Navy and Notre Dame will meet for the 89th time on Saturday, a rivalry that dates back to 1927. After the Midshipmen won three of four games starting in 2007, Notre Dame hopes to extend their current winning streak to five games on Saturday.

Here’s an early look at some of the gear: