Meet the assistants


After Brian Kelly made his introductions and answered a few questions (more on that later), the assistant coaches were introduced to the media for the first time and spoke to the gathered press.

With the exception of defensive line coach and special teams coordinator Mike Elston, whose wife just gave birth to a baby girl, people got their first looks at Bob Diaco, Charley Molnar, Kerry Cooks, Tim Hinton, Chuck Martin, Ed Warinner, and Paul Longo.

Here are some snap impressions:


Diaco is a young and charismatic guy. As people have pointed out from the few photos available of him on the internet, the guy loves his threads. His crisp oxford shirt and sweater vest looked right out of the Hammes bookstore catalog. (At the very least, if the coaching thing doesn’t work out, he could get a gig modeling ND gear…) But as Kerry Cooks alluded to in his introductory quotes, Diaco oozes intensity. I can only imagine the maniac he was as a team captain and linebacker at Iowa. “Baby Blue,” as Cooks called him, talked the Xs and Os of the 3-4 system that Diaco and Kelly will implement, which have influences from coaches all around the country.


Molnar seems to be another polished guy, and once again promotes the company line that all the assistants seem to embrace. If there’s one thing that’s certain, this team will be aggressive. “We are looking to score virtually every time we have the ball,” Molnar said. “When the one offense is in, when the two offense is in, we’re looking to score… If it’s a good football decision, we’re looking to score.” I know more than a few Irish fans wouldn’t mind getting the second string offense a few touchdowns against Navy this year.


Alford’s not new to the staff, but I felt bad not including his comments from yesterday, especially since he’s making the change from running backs to wide receivers. Alford’s going to continue being an ace recruiter, and cross-training as a wide receivers coach will only benefit Alford as he makes his ascent in the business. Alford and Kelly have already logged a ton of miles together, working to keep the committed recruits together as well as bring in a few more players in this year’s class. I’ve got all the confidence in the world that Alford won’t miss a beat when working with the wideouts. 


Cooks seems to be a smooth operator, which will definitely help with recruiting. He admitted that the transition to a 3-4 will be a different defense than he’s used to, as both he and Chuck Martin are moving over from a 4-3 base defense. He’ll also be transitioning to coaching a new position, working with outside linebackers, after coaching the secondary at Wisconsin. What I liked most from Cooks was his talk about continuity for the defense, which I think will help a unit that was thinking far too much last year.


Denbrock certainly seems happy to be back at Notre Dame and at ease with the return. While I was originally skeptical about Denbrock’s ability to handle West Coast recruiting, and he’ll never be confused with Brian Polian or Lane Kiffin, he’s got a folksy charm that seems to welcome people in. Denbrock didn’t shy away from talking about his first time here, and he sounded incredibly genuine and positive when talking about how much he loved the university. It was especially interesting to hear him talk about the Gug, and just how much the campus has transformed over the past five years.


Hinton’s the wily veteran of the coaching staff. A self-proclaimed farm boy, he’ll have the state of Ohio on lock down, having spent his entire coaching career in the state. Listening to Hinton, the fact that he’s a football lifer is evident in the first few seconds. While Tony Alford obviously returns to the staff after spending last year with the running backs, Hinton talked about starting everyone with a clean slate. He also talked about the different responsibilities of a running back in a spread offense, which means that every running back better get used to catching the ball and blocking.


Martin’s a great addition to the coaching staff, and his prolific D-II record can’t hurt. Martin’s new to the group which he was quick to mention, but obviously has ties with the head man, who knew he was a key hire. Listening to Martin, his love of Notre Dame came out immediately. Even more importantly, as the voice of the secondary, he’ll instill a new attitude. “Every touchdown goes through the secondary,” Martin said, before talking about limiting the big plays. As we all saw that year, that final objective with be key.


Even though he pulled his wardrobe from Mike Brey’s closet, Ed Warinner gets huge kudos from me. The fact that he proactively sought this job after hearing Jeff Quinn was heading to Buffalo shows me Warinner is a guy that wants to be a part of the Irish program. As the only coach without a tangential connection to Kelly, Warinner’s body of work was enough to convince Kelly that the former Kansas offensive coordinator was the man to build on Frank Verducci’s success and continue to elevate a unit that’s replacing three starters.


It’s pretty clear Longo was on his best behavior, and the new strength and conditioning coach left his muscle shirts in the closet to meet with the media. The ever-present smile on Longo’s face made it seem like there was an inside joke that we were all missing, which most likely has something to do with the absolute beating he put on his players that morning. Longo ducked and weaved his way through any questions asking for trade secrets, most likely aware that his  “coat of armor” talk has already become an internet favorite. It’s natural for fans to get excited about the new strength coach’s regime, but with Longo, Kelly has brought in a guy who has been doing it right for a very long time. 

Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.



Navy, Notre Dame will display mutual respect with uniforms

Keenan Reynolds, Isaac Rochell

The storied and important history of Notre Dame and Navy’s long-running rivalry will be on display this weekend, with the undefeated Midshipmen coming to South Bend this weekend.

On NBCSN, a half-hour documentary presentation will take a closer look, with “Onward Notre Dame: Mutual Respect” talking about everything from Notre Dame’s 43-year winning streak, to Navy’s revival, triggered by their victory in 2007. The episode will also talk about the rivalries ties to World War II, and how the Navy helped keep Notre Dame alive during wartime.

You can catch it on tonight at 6:30 p.m. ET on NBCSN or online in the same viewing window.

On the field, perhaps an even more unique gesture of respect is planned. With Under Armour the apparel partner for both Notre Dame and Navy, both teams will take the field wearing the same cleats, gloves and baselayers. Each team’s coaching staff will also be outfitted in the same sideline gear.

More from Monday’s press release:

For the first time in college football, two opponents take the field with the exact same Under Armour baselayer, gloves and cleats to pay homage to the storied history and brotherhood between their two schools. The baselayer features both Universities’ alma maters on the sleeves and glove palms with the words “respect, honor, tradition” as a reminder of their connection to each other. Both sidelines and coaches also will wear the same sideline gear as a sign of mutual admiration.​

Navy and Notre Dame will meet for the 89th time on Saturday, a rivalry that dates back to 1927. After the Midshipmen won three of four games starting in 2007, Notre Dame hopes to extend their current winning streak to five games on Saturday.

Here’s an early look at some of the gear: