Skip to content

Monday night news catch-up

Jun 7, 2010, 11:49 PM EST

It’s well past my bedtime and because of some intermittent internet at the lovely Varsity Club in Mishawaka I’m still plugging away at this, but there’s been some serious smoke coming out of the expansion chimneys the past day or two.

Start with colleague John Taylor’s excellent reporting at CFT, where he actually went to the source and debunked an Associated Press story that had Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick in Park Ridge, Illinois meeting with Big Ten presidents and chancellors for 4.5 hours, discussion expansion.

Here’s Brian Hardin, Notre Dame’s director of media relations, report:

Hi John,

Thanks for the email. I think the 150 people that attended the graduation open house of Jack Swarbrick’s son today in Indianapolis would help me deny that Jack was in attendance at the Big Ten meetings today in Chicago. I hate to have to throw cold water on yet another “report” regarding Notre Dame and the Big Ten, but like many “reports” before this one, there isn’t any validity to it. Feel free to quote me on any of this.

Bam. That’s about as emphatic as you can get, though a conspiracy theorist would point out that Hardin didn’t say that Action Jack didn’t talk with Big Ten head-honchos, merely that he wasn’t there.

Meanwhile, a little newspaper called the New York Times has another report on Notre Dame’s role in all the expansion talk. Pete Thamel, the Times writer who also started this uprising with the “seismic shift” quotes back in March, had this to say about Notre Dame’s role.

In March, on an unseasonably warm morning in New York City, Notre Dame Athletic Director Jack Swarbrick seemed
to push the collegiate conference expansion discussion from theory to
reality. He told a small group of reporters that the Irish would
reconsider their football independence if it appeared that “seismic”
change to the college football landscape was on the horizon.

Three months later, it appears that Swarbrick and Notre Dame have the
ability to prevent that potential seismic shift. Who said that Notre
Dame, even in times of football struggle, was irrelevant?

The Irish have become the unintentional linchpin of conference expansion
because of their potential value to the Big Ten. It is clear that the
Irish would prefer to stay as an independent, which Swarbrick has
vehemently maintained, but he is potentially facing a conundrum: Does
Notre Dame become the 12th team in the Big Ten or does it risk being
forced to later join the conference as the 16th team?

The Big Ten has 11 teams, and if it adds Notre Dame, which it appears
it wants to, the Irish would probably not want to be part of a 16-team
superleague. The Irish, in theory, would have the power to cap the
league at 12 teams.

“I think it’s impossible to say,” Swarbrick said Monday when asked about
the theory that Notre Dame joining the Big Ten would stabilize the
collegiate landscape. “I understand why people have that conjecture. I
also think it’s equally plausible that enough things have been spun in
motion that it may not be true.”

As it’s been since the beginning, I still feel like this is a gigantic game of chicken, with Notre Dame driving Optimus Prime and the Big Ten driving a fleet of smart cars. That’s not to say that Ohio State, Michigan, and Penn State aren’t big-rig programs, but they’ve hinged their fate to Purdue, Northwestern and Indiana. 

I’m still waiting for ESPN to start covering this like the important news story that it actually is. For some reason, the WWL just seems to ignore this one on SportsCenter, probably because it doesn’t fit into a convenient box for marketing.

  1. TLNDMA - Jun 8, 2010 at 5:57 AM

    Keith, “waiting for ESPN” to start covering the expansion issue? If they do that, as they usually cover stories in the past few years, it will be from the angle that best suits ESPN and it’s future. Not as real journalists. I’d much prefer to keep getting my information on this from actual news sources around the country, even if it takes a little more work on my part.

  2. Art Vandelay - Jun 9, 2010 at 3:16 PM

    Keith, you stated,”That’s about as emphatic as you can get, though a conspiracy theorist would point out that Hardin didn’t say that Action Jack didn’t talk with Big Ten head-honchos, merely that he wasn’t there.” Actually, he didn’t say Swarbrick wasn’t there, he merely intimated that the people at his son’s graduation open house would deny it also. Now that’s a conspiracy.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!