Tuesday's with BK: Michigan State


Brian Kelly was back with the media today, discussing the Irish, Michigan State, and what needs to happen for Notre Dame to walk out of Spartan Stadium Saturday night with a victory.

Here’s a few minutes of what he said:


There’s plenty to discuss in the nearly four-minutes of video, but here are a few more thoughts after watching the entire press conference:

it’s clear that the Irish need to find a way to get Michael Floyd more involved in the offense, and one of those ways is to get wide receiver Theo Riddick on track.

“I still think we’re a work in progress there. It’s something that he’s
learning more every day about how to be a championship wide receiver,
not just a guy,” Kelly said about Riddick.”He’s worked hard at it. We have to be a little bit patient in that
process of getting him to where we need him to be. I see a comfort level
with him each and every week where he’s starting to feel a lot more
comfortable. Obviously had a nice catch up the sideline. I think we’re in the early stages of development of a very good player.”

It seems like defenses have been content to take Floyd away with double coverage and force Crist to use other targets, most notably Kyle Rudolph. But if this offense is going to get into gear the way that it needs to, they’ll need to make Theo Riddick a weapon in the middle of the field. While Kelly was clear to state that Riddick’s job wasn’t in danger, the Irish either need to get some production from Riddick or start sliding Floyd around the field to get him more involved in the game plan.


I realize I never mentioned it this weekend, but defensive line coach and special teams coordinator Mike Elston missed the Michigan game with a viral infection, something that had to bother him since he was playing against his alma mater.

Kelly updated Elston’s condition this afternoon:

“All I can tell you is he is still not with us. In his absence, our
coaches have done a great job. We team coached the special teams. I
thought we did a pretty good job. You know, the best analogy that I
heard was that for our coaches to really step in there, they really
picked up for one of the best special teams coaches in the country and
did a very good job. I think there’s a lot of confidence there that we
can continue on with that.

“The defensive line obviously is his position as well. So for the
immediate time, until Coach Elston does get back, Mike Denbrock will go
over and coach the defensive line. Lorenzo Guess, who was in the weight
room for us as one of our strength and conditioning coaches, will go and
coach the tight ends position. He coached the tight ends for me last
year at the University of Cincinnati. We should have a pretty seamless
transition. Again, this is just for a short time. We’re expecting that Coach Elston will be back with us pretty soon.”

Having Lorenzo Guess on the strength and conditioning staff is a huge asset to the football program. Not only do you have a coach that clearly understands football working in the weight room — always a plus, you also have someone that’s familiar with Kelly’s teaching style and offensive philosophy, and he’ll be able to sub in right away.  Even more exciting for Guess, he’ll be coaching back in his old stomping grounds, where he played both football and basketball for the Spartans.

Here’s hoping Elston is back on his feet in no time. He’s a good guy and a good coach.


Kelly shared some of his early grades on the offensive line after two weeks, and surprisingly Zack Martin and Taylor Dever, two tackles that hadn’t started a game, have outplayed his expectations.

“I think Dever and Martin have exceeded my
expectations. We’re still a work in progress inside. Braxston has been
inconsistent. Trevor, who has the most experience, didn’t have his best
game. Stewey has been pretty good, pretty consistent. I would take that back. I would say Stewey and the two tackles have been
pretty consistent. We need more consistency from Cave and Robinson at
this point. They have been good, but not at the level the other three
guys have been.”

For this offensive line to play up to their potential, they’ll need Robinson to set up and become a dominating guard. He’s got the skills to do it, it’s just a matter of playing better football. All in all, I don’t think anyone can be upset about the way this offensive line as played, particularly after replacing three starters and learning an entirely new system.


That TJ Jones touchdown where he might have started to celebrate a little bit early? Let’s just say TJ Jones isn’t going to do that again.

“That’s discipline. That’s a young kid that’s got to have understanding,
act like you’ve been there before. You’re not flipping the ball off
before you get in there. It’s unacceptable, and he heard it. It will be
the last time he does it because he won’t be back on the field if he
does it again.”

Before Kelly laid down the law, he joked that he pulled down Jones’ pants and gave him a spanking. Jones is the youngest looking guy on the team, but I’m not sure he’s that young.

Only focus after Clemson loss is winning on Saturday

SOUTH BEND, IN - SEPTEMBER 19: Head coach Brian Kelly of the Notre Dame Fighting Irish looks on against the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets in the second quarter at Notre Dame Stadium on September 19, 2015 in South Bend, Indiana. Notre Dame defeated Georgia Tech 30-22. (Photo by Joe Robbins/Getty Images)

The 2015 college football season has yet to showcase a truly great football team. With early title contenders like Ohio State and Michigan State looking less than stellar, Alabama losing a game already and the Pac-12 beating itself up, the chance that a one-loss Notre Dame team could still make it into the College Football Playoff is certainly a possibility.

But don’t expect Brian Kelly and his football team to start worrying about that now.

We saw a similar situation unfold last season, after the Irish lost a heartbreaker in the final seconds against Florida State. With many fans worried that Notre Dame wasn’t given credit for their performance in Tallahassee, the Irish’s playoff resume mattered very little as the team fell apart down the stretch.

As Notre Dame looks forward, their focus only extends to Saturday. That’s when Navy will test the Irish with their triple-option attack and better-than-usual defense, a team that Brian Kelly voted into his Top 25 this week.

Can this team make it to the Playoff? Kelly isn’t sure. But he knows what his team has to do.

“I don’t know,” Kelly said when asked about a one-loss entrance. “But we do know what we can control, and that is winning each week. So what we really talked about is we have no margin for error, and we have to pay attention to every detail.

“Each game is the biggest and most important game we play and really focusing on that. It isn’t concern yourself with big picture. You really have to focus on one week at a time.”

Kelly spread that message to his five captains after the game on Saturday night. He’s optimistic that message has set in over the weekend, and he’ll see how the team practices as they begin their on-field preparations for Navy this afternoon.

But when asked what type of response he wants to see from his team this week, it wasn’t about the minutiae of the week or a company line about daily improvement.

“The response is to win. That’s the response that we’re looking for,” Kelly said, before detailing four major factors to victory. “To win football games, you have to start fast, which we did not. There has to be an attention to detail, which certainly we were missing that at times. We got great effort, and we finished strong. So we were missing two of the four real key components that I’ll be looking for for this weekend. As long as we have those four key components, I’ll take a win by one. That would be fine with me. We need those four key components. That’s what I’ll be looking for.”

Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.