The good, the bad, the ugly: Boston College


Reaction to the Irish win last night is running about as hot and cold as the Irish offense was last night. For as many fans that are enthusiastic about Notre Dame drubbing rival Boston College at Alumni Field — something the Irish haven’t been able to do since 1998 — there are just as many people complaining about the inconsistency that continues to plague this team as it evolves.

“I didn’t come in thinking that we were ready for the national championship game,” head coach Brian Kelly admitted after the victory. “But the process for us has been exactly what I thought it would be. We’re developing a mentality and a toughness, a physical and mental toughness, that all the teams that I coach want to display. We just have to work really hard on that principle.”

While Kelly rattles the eardrums of his players ingraining that philosophy, he also continues to mold a team into the likeness he desires. While the methods surprise many that expected a buttoned-up coach that matches the man they see in press conferences and public appearances, the leader of the Irish is as fiery as the last coach beloved by Notre Dame Nation, a man named Lou Holtz.

The Irish win was in many ways a perfect outcome for Kelly and the coaching staff. A dominating victory that featured exceptional play by both the offense and defense in spurts, but enough teachable moments that reaffirm the weekly message this coaching staff preaches.

Let’s take a look at the good, bad, and ugly from Notre Dame’s 31-13 victory over Boston College.


An Irish defense that was labeled “high school” by ESPN analyst Kirk Herbstreit on ESPN’s College GameDay, absolutely stifled the Eagles’ offense. Praise certainly should be heaped on the rush defense of the Irish, but what’s not to be discounted is the Irish defense’s ability to hold the fort down when they’re forced into immediate action — something that’s happened too often with the Irish offense turning the ball over more often than they’d like.

“They did a great job the last couple of weeks with turnovers,” Kelly said this afternoon. “Against Stanford we turned the ball over on a sack fumble and held them to a field goal. We’ve been very resilient on what we consider those crucial moments, sudden change we call them. Our defense has been very good against sudden change.”

In a second quarter that saw the Irish offense attempt to give back much of what they did during the opening minutes, Bob Diaco’s troops held strong, limiting Boston College to only one of six on third down even thought the Eagles held the ball for 10:43 in the second quarter.

Kelly has been open about his pleasure in the defense’s play so far this season, even if the stats didn’t prove it. Saturday’s performance was a nice step in the right direction for the Notre Dame defense, who will need to continue with the improvement they showed on Saturday.

(Special Mention in the good category goes to true freshman Bennett Jackson and Prince Shembo, who both made an impact on the game — Jackson on the opening kickoff and Shembo in pass rush situations.)


It’s hard to be too hard on any facet of the Irish, but it’s clear that the Irish passing game is still a work-in-progress. Dayne Crist looked great in the opening drives of the game, but his 4.5 yards per attempt is sub-par in an offense that has as many weapons as the Irish do.

It’d be unfair to complain about a quarterback that’s played as well as Crist has in the first five starts of his career, but Kelly has made it clear that Dayne needs to master the spread system if he’s going to lead the Irish back to prominence.

“He’s gotta be a spread quarterback or he can’t be
the quarterback here. Period. We’re running the spread offense and he’s
gotta be a spread quarterback,” Kelly said. “If he can’t do that, he can’t be the
quarterback here. He’s all in. He’s 100 percent in. He had a great week
of practice and preparation. We’ve begun to build on that process of
developing him as a spread quarterback. He’s not there yet, but he’s
developing. He’s shown signs. I think we’re going to get better each and
every week.”

The transition hasn’t only been difficult on Crist, but also front-line players like Michael Floyd and Kyle Rudolph. Floyd and Crist missed on a sight-adjustment that nearly turned into an easy interception for BC, and while many assumed Kyle Rudolph’s lack of production was because of defensive schematics, Kelly acknowledged that even his tight end is going through some growing pains.

“He’s getting better too at learning where he fits within the offense as well,” Kelly said of Rudolph. “There’s some things he has to continue to work on… He’s usually in tight coverage situations. They know where Kyle Rudolph is. You’re not going to get Kyle Rudolph one-on-one without tight coverage on him. He’s evolving as well within our offense… but it’s a process for Kyle as well.”


It was an ugly victory Saturday night, and if that’s the only ugly that Irish fans have to deal with, then everybody should get in line to sign up. While a faction of Dame fans downplayed the game the Irish played, consider what Boston College head coach Frank Spaziani said after the game:

“First of all congratulations to coach Kelly and Notre Dame, they did a good job,” Spaziani said. “They came in here and licked us schematically, physically, every way. They really played a very good football game.”

After three very downtrodden weeks that ended in Notre Dame defeats, Irish eyes are finally smiling.

“Happy happy happy. Everybody’s happy in Notre Dame land,” Kelly said after the game. “Our
players wanted to win badly. They worked hard at it, I’m happy that
they got a win, but they know they’ve got a long way to go. But they’re
doing the right things to get there. We’ve just got to keep grinding.
We’re not there yet. But we’ll go to work every day and continue to work
on those things to get us better.”

Only focus after Clemson loss is winning on Saturday

SOUTH BEND, IN - SEPTEMBER 19: Head coach Brian Kelly of the Notre Dame Fighting Irish looks on against the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets in the second quarter at Notre Dame Stadium on September 19, 2015 in South Bend, Indiana. Notre Dame defeated Georgia Tech 30-22. (Photo by Joe Robbins/Getty Images)

The 2015 college football season has yet to showcase a truly great football team. With early title contenders like Ohio State and Michigan State looking less than stellar, Alabama losing a game already and the Pac-12 beating itself up, the chance that a one-loss Notre Dame team could still make it into the College Football Playoff is certainly a possibility.

But don’t expect Brian Kelly and his football team to start worrying about that now.

We saw a similar situation unfold last season, after the Irish lost a heartbreaker in the final seconds against Florida State. With many fans worried that Notre Dame wasn’t given credit for their performance in Tallahassee, the Irish’s playoff resume mattered very little as the team fell apart down the stretch.

As Notre Dame looks forward, their focus only extends to Saturday. That’s when Navy will test the Irish with their triple-option attack and better-than-usual defense, a team that Brian Kelly voted into his Top 25 this week.

Can this team make it to the Playoff? Kelly isn’t sure. But he knows what his team has to do.

“I don’t know,” Kelly said when asked about a one-loss entrance. “But we do know what we can control, and that is winning each week. So what we really talked about is we have no margin for error, and we have to pay attention to every detail.

“Each game is the biggest and most important game we play and really focusing on that. It isn’t concern yourself with big picture. You really have to focus on one week at a time.”

Kelly spread that message to his five captains after the game on Saturday night. He’s optimistic that message has set in over the weekend, and he’ll see how the team practices as they begin their on-field preparations for Navy this afternoon.

But when asked what type of response he wants to see from his team this week, it wasn’t about the minutiae of the week or a company line about daily improvement.

“The response is to win. That’s the response that we’re looking for,” Kelly said, before detailing four major factors to victory. “To win football games, you have to start fast, which we did not. There has to be an attention to detail, which certainly we were missing that at times. We got great effort, and we finished strong. So we were missing two of the four real key components that I’ll be looking for for this weekend. As long as we have those four key components, I’ll take a win by one. That would be fine with me. We need those four key components. That’s what I’ll be looking for.”

Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.