Aaron Lynch Army Bowl

Signing Day 2011: Power


(You’ll read about a dozen columns talking about the three position grouping distinctions and how Brian Kelly and his staff use them, giving Skill, Big Skill, and Power the opportunity to become this year’s RKGs as we meander into the offseason. Just remember, I started these columns before BK re-introduced it during his press conference.)

Power. A pretty easy concept to understand when you look at the characteristics of the recruits Brian Kelly and his staff added today. Consider:

Tally up the average height of every power player signed by the coaching staff, and it averages 6-foot-5. Of the players recruited by the Weis regime, here are the players that measure that tall at power positions: Trevor Robinson, Andrew Nuss, Taylor Dever, Lane Clelland, and Chris Stewart — each one of them an offensive lineman, helping to underscore just how schematically unbalanced the roster had become on the defensive side of the ball. In the power grouping that signed with the Irish today, only two players are below 6-5, Conor Hanratty and Nick Martin (both 6-4), and both of them are slated for play on the offensive line.

Height isn’t all that matters for a football prospect, but in the Irish’s 3-4 system, getting the defensive front up to size was a huge challenge for the Irish and something this recruiting class will certainly help balance.

“What we’ve added to the defensive line is guys that have the size and can push on the offensive line,” defensive line coach Mike Elston said. “We didn’t get knocked off the ball this season and now adding guys that are big enough and they’re going to be strong enough.”

We’ve already discussed a defensive line haul that’s as good as any Rivals has seen in its years of calcuating position rankings. Let’s take a look at all the Power players that signed with the Irish today:


Brad Carrico, DL: Carrico was the first commitment to the class of 2011 and he’s a big body that’s got the opportunity to play on either offensive or defensive line, though he’ll start on Bob Diaco’s side of the ball. Carrico committed early to the Irish, had offers from predominantly Midwestern schools and has the type of massive frame and an extra semester in Paul Longo’s strength program where he’s going to have an opportunity to contribute down the line, with his athleticism deciding whether it’s on offensive or defense.

Conor Hanratty, OL: The son of former Notre Dame All-American Terry Hanratty, the coaching staff has made it clear that Conor wasn’t offered a scholarship just because of the name on the back of his jersey.

“There are a lot of alumni out there that want to have their sons or daughters on scholarship at Notre Dame,” offensive line coach Ed Warinner said. “He’s a great technician. He’s a smart kid. He’s very physical and he plays hard. He could be a right tackle, right guard, possibly a center. He’s got the demeanor we like.”

Hanratty had offers from programs like Cal, Boston College and Florida State, and he’ll be plugged into an offensive line that returns 8 of its 10 top players.

Matt Hegarty, OL: Arguably the crown jewel of the offensive line recruiting class, Hegarty is a U.S. Army All-American that had offers from just about every top program in the country before pledging to Warinner and Kelly in November. A consensus Top 50 player in the country by every recruiting service, Hegarty’s got elite tackle size and athleticism that projects him to thrive on either the right or left side of the offensive line. While his recruitment didn’t get the headlines that Aaron Lynch or Stephon Tuitt got, you could make the argument that he’s the best offensive prospect the Irish signed.

Chase Hounshell, DL: Pledging the Irish late in the game after spending much of his recruitment committed to the Florida Gators, Hounshell was the Associated Press Ohio Division II co-defensive player of the year and a finalist for the Tony Fisher Award, given to the top high school football player in the Cleveland area. Hounshell will also start out on the defensive line but has the ability to shift to the other side of the ball if needed.

Aaron Lynch, DE: The recruitment of Lynch will likely go down as one of Notre Dame’s greatest recruiting stories never told, with the prized defensive end’s flip back to Notre Dame after committing to Florida State all but confirming Tony Alford’s place in the pantheon of great Irish assistant coaches. Lynch, already enrolled in school for two weeks, has every opportunity to get on the field immediately, helping a pass rush that could use more pressure on quarterbacks. Lynch is a massive defensive end that has elite speed off the edge, a dizzying prospect for a guy that’s yet to log serious hours in the weight room. Expect Lynch and Stephon Tuitt to anchor the defensive end positions after Kapron Lewis-Moore and Ethan Johnson graduate.

Nick Martin, OL: The brother of Zack Martin, Notre Dame’s best offensive lineman after only his redshirt freshman season, the younger sibling brings an All-State pedigree to South Bend that rivals his brothers. Named first-team All State by Indiana’s Associated Press, Martin flipped his commitment from Kentucky, where he was one of their biggest recruits. Nick adds another blue-chip tackle prospect that’ll help support an offensive line that returns four starters.

Tony Springmann, DE: Another Notre Dame prospect out of pipeline school Bishop Dwenger in Fort Wayne, Springmann is a jumbo-sized defensive end that the coaching staff is incredibly high on. Already listed at 6-6, 275, Springmann walks into Notre Dame this summer with the size needed to succeed as a 3-4 defensive end, and could grow his way into a player that could have an impact on both sides of the ball.

Stephon Tuitt, DE: Along with Lynch, one of Notre Dame’s best defensive line prospects since the Irish inked Victor Abiamiri. Tuitt was a five-star prospect according to Rivals and Scout, a consensus Top 100 player in the country and the Irish won a heated recruitment against Paul Johnson and the hometown Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets. Tuitt was a wrecking ball at the U.S. Army All-American game, where he physically dominated some of the most talented players in the country. Along with Aaron Lynch, Tuitt will likely see the field immediately.

Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.



Navy, Notre Dame will display mutual respect with uniforms

Keenan Reynolds, Isaac Rochell

The storied and important history of Notre Dame and Navy’s long-running rivalry will be on display this weekend, with the undefeated Midshipmen coming to South Bend this weekend.

On NBCSN, a half-hour documentary presentation will take a closer look, with “Onward Notre Dame: Mutual Respect” talking about everything from Notre Dame’s 43-year winning streak, to Navy’s revival, triggered by their victory in 2007. The episode will also talk about the rivalries ties to World War II, and how the Navy helped keep Notre Dame alive during wartime.

You can catch it on tonight at 6:30 p.m. ET on NBCSN or online in the same viewing window.

On the field, perhaps an even more unique gesture of respect is planned. With Under Armour the apparel partner for both Notre Dame and Navy, both teams will take the field wearing the same cleats, gloves and baselayers. Each team’s coaching staff will also be outfitted in the same sideline gear.

More from Monday’s press release:

For the first time in college football, two opponents take the field with the exact same Under Armour baselayer, gloves and cleats to pay homage to the storied history and brotherhood between their two schools. The baselayer features both Universities’ alma maters on the sleeves and glove palms with the words “respect, honor, tradition” as a reminder of their connection to each other. Both sidelines and coaches also will wear the same sideline gear as a sign of mutual admiration.​

Navy and Notre Dame will meet for the 89th time on Saturday, a rivalry that dates back to 1927. After the Midshipmen won three of four games starting in 2007, Notre Dame hopes to extend their current winning streak to five games on Saturday.

Here’s an early look at some of the gear: