Getty Images - Jonathan Daniel

Weekend notes: Floyd, QBs (present and future), and more


Let’s tackle one of the more interesting tidbits first. It’s expected that Michael Floyd will be meeting with ResLife this afternoon to ultimately determine his university punishment for his drunk-driving arrest that happened in mid-March, just before spring football practice was set to start.

Floyd’s been on indefinite suspension from all football activities, missing the first 10 practices of the Irish spring season, and has been held out of all other football activities since. He made a brief appearance on Twitter a few nights ago that got the internet humming, and supported his former teammates at ND’s Pro Day yesterday.

The meeting originally set for yesterday was rescheduled for today, certain sources have told me, and that meeting will hold the key for Michael’s future at Notre Dame. One thing I can report for certain — Floyd’s already committed to getting his life back on track, something Brian Kelly mentioned nearly a week ago, and he’s also committed to getting his degree from Notre Dame, one of the main reasons he decided to stick around for his senior season in the first place.

There’s likely no disciplinary measure that’ll make everybody happy. The hardliners can make a compelling argument that his career should be over, and they’ve got precedence to support their case. There’s also a valid case to be made that Floyd’s punishment could’ve already been served, as long as he continues on the straight and narrow. The likely outcome? Who honestly knows. For every Will Yeatman fiasco you can look at the level-headed punishment of Mike Ragone last year, a marijuana arrest last May that cost the tight end nothing in terms of games.

It’s possible the university will discipline Floyd academically and leave his athletic punishment up to the football staff and athletic department. If that’s the case, expect most of the penance to be done in either public service or private, and a suspension in the range of 1-2 games. Again, this is only an educated guess based on what I’ve been hearing, but Floyd will have to continue to prove he deserves this second chance, and in many ways the timing of this gives him the opportunity to prove it before the season starts.

(By 5pm tonight, this entire bit could be proven completely wrong, so don’t get your hopes up…)


It was Dayne Crist’s turn in the spotlight and if you’re looking for articles on him you are in luck. It was thought that if Crist could return healthy he’d be in the driver’s seat for the QB competition and that’s proven correct.

In fact, his knee surgery is once again a non-factor after being a huge concern.

“I don’t notice it,” Crist said. “I really don’t notice it out there at all. The treatment becomes less and less post-practice. I feel really fortunate and really blessed that I’m where I’m at right now. I’m just continuing to get stronger in the weight room from a lower body standpoint. That’s just me being behind for several months, but I don’t feel like there’s a huge drop-off. I’m still being real active and making up a lot of ground in there.”

There’s no benefit for Brian Kelly to announce a starting quarterback publicly at the end of spring. That said, there’s isn’t much of a benefit to him announcing that decision internally either, and he’s only committed to pairing down the depth chart to three-deep, which will likely be what happens in preseason camp.

Regardless of if the starting job stays in limbo, it’s clear Crist has taken over a leadership role on the offense, a personality trait of the quarterback’s that’s never been in doubt.


Turning to quarterbacks yet on the roster, ESPN’s Bruce Feldman took a look at the top QB recruiting battles in 2012, and Notre Dame target Gunner Kiel topped the list.

From Feldman:

Kiel has a great first name for a QB. He also has a strong pedigree. His uncle, Blair Kiel, was a quarterback for Notre Dame and in the NFL, and his older brothers also are QBs — Drew played at Illinois State and Dustin is with the Indiana Hoosiers. The younger Kiel’s arm has wowed scouts.

Kiel’s recruitment hasn’t gotten crazy, but the 6-foot-4, 215-pounder joked that “it’s getting there.” Kiel said he is determined not to rush his thought process. “I want to make a decision whenever I’m ready,” he said Tuesday night. “I’m trying to get to know these situations to find the perfect fit for me.”

Kiel said he isn’t one to surf around the web in hopes of getting a feel for what other QBs and colleges may be up to. “I don’t really follow it,” he said. “I’m just letting the cards play out and go with the flow.”

Of course, it helps that he’s probably on top of a bunch of schools’ wish lists and may get the right of first refusal. Among the many programs in the mix are Notre Dame, Oklahoma, Alabama, Indiana, Michigan, Tennessee, Iowa, Wisconsin and Missouri.

There’s been a lot of speculation that Kiel is leaning to Notre Dame (he said he rooted for the Irish growing up but added that he was always “a fairweather fan” and changed allegiances often depending on which team was hot). He said his next move is to fly to Oklahoma to check out the Sooners’ program on Thursday.

Kiel figures to have an impact on other QBs in his class. According to the South Bend Tribune, one of them could be Maty Mauk, the younger brother of former Cincinnati Bearcats passer Ben Mauk, who played for Brian Kelly at UC. “I met with Maty Mauk recently and I definitely believe he’s leaning to Notre Dame,” Chicago-based recruiting analyst Tom Lemming said. “I think he would have committed to Notre Dame already had his mother not insisted on him visiting other schools.

“Gunner Kiel recently had a great visit to Notre Dame, enough so that I think at this early stage the Irish are either the favorites or even with the other favorites. If [the Irish] take Mauk early, they could lose Kiel.”

It’ll be interesting to see how that plays out.

There are certainly worse situations for the Irish to be in with both Mauk and Kiel truly interested in the Irish, but it seems like Kiel wants to take his time.


We noticed him earlier in the week and coaches have been talking about the nice spring Dan Fox has put together. With Prince Shembo and Danny Spond taking most of the reps at the ‘Dog’ linebacker position, Fox has moved inside, where he’s competing for the spot next to Manti Te’o, a competition that’s getting him a lot of reps with Anthony McDonald down with a torn pectoral muscle and Te’o limited from most action, in all likelihood the Blue-Gold game as well.

Fox talked about the position shift and the changes he’s made to improve since last season, when he initially slide inside.

“Last year I was kind of figuring out playing inside linebacker, trying to read the run real fast and then getting out in my pass drops,” Fox said. “Every time you play a position for two years you are going to feel a little bit more comfortable because you have the whole year of experience under your belt. That helps a lot.”

Fox’s ascent coincides with a very candid and public statement by defensive coordinator Bob Diaco when discussing what Carlo Calabrese has to do to continue as the starting linebacker next to Te’o.

“Carlo has to clean his game up. He has to get himself to a point where he’s not a liability of one of those 11 and right now he is,” Diaco said. “He needs to improve all areas. He needs to improve on his run fits and his eye progression in his run fits. He needs to clean up his pass fits and the fundamentals of how to get that done. He needs to clean up his cardio so that he can play harder longer. He needs to clean up, just in general, his game. If he wants to be the starting inside linebacker at Notre Dame and not be 11 of 11, then he’s got work to do.”

There are five more practices for this to play out, including all fall camp, but it’s clear that Diaco is taking a move from the Brian Kelly playbook on his message to Calabrese.


Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.



Navy, Notre Dame will display mutual respect with uniforms

Keenan Reynolds, Isaac Rochell

The storied and important history of Notre Dame and Navy’s long-running rivalry will be on display this weekend, with the undefeated Midshipmen coming to South Bend this weekend.

On NBCSN, a half-hour documentary presentation will take a closer look, with “Onward Notre Dame: Mutual Respect” talking about everything from Notre Dame’s 43-year winning streak, to Navy’s revival, triggered by their victory in 2007. The episode will also talk about the rivalries ties to World War II, and how the Navy helped keep Notre Dame alive during wartime.

You can catch it on tonight at 6:30 p.m. ET on NBCSN or online in the same viewing window.

On the field, perhaps an even more unique gesture of respect is planned. With Under Armour the apparel partner for both Notre Dame and Navy, both teams will take the field wearing the same cleats, gloves and baselayers. Each team’s coaching staff will also be outfitted in the same sideline gear.

More from Monday’s press release:

For the first time in college football, two opponents take the field with the exact same Under Armour baselayer, gloves and cleats to pay homage to the storied history and brotherhood between their two schools. The baselayer features both Universities’ alma maters on the sleeves and glove palms with the words “respect, honor, tradition” as a reminder of their connection to each other. Both sidelines and coaches also will wear the same sideline gear as a sign of mutual admiration.​

Navy and Notre Dame will meet for the 89th time on Saturday, a rivalry that dates back to 1927. After the Midshipmen won three of four games starting in 2007, Notre Dame hopes to extend their current winning streak to five games on Saturday.

Here’s an early look at some of the gear: