May 17, 2011, 2:10 PM EDT
The 2010 season was the first time many Notre Dame fans had seen Brian Kelly’s offense in action. Sure, the highlights of Cincinnati burning through the Big East were out there, but for most Irish fans, the BK experience began during spring practice last year, where players, reporters and fans all got to see up-tempo in motion.
Meanwhile, over at Down The Drive, a Cincinnati Bearcats blog, writer Matt Opper has been taking a comprehensive, three-part look, at the difference between Kelly and Butch Jones, the man taking over at Cincinnati. It’s been a pretty fascinating read filled with YouTube clips, play diagrams, and a pretty glowing review of what Kelly was able to do in three short years at Cincinnati.
It’s truly worth reading the 5,000 or so words, but Opper encapsulates his beliefs in this tidy paragraph:
In the end the differences between Kelly and Jones and the representative offensive schemes and game plans isn’t that big. There are some key differences in the design and execution of them, sure. But the real difference between Butch Jones and Brian Kelly might come down to one position. In my opinion Jones needs a very specific type of Quarterback to make his system really fire on all cylinders. He needs that mobile QB with a big arm to work out of the pocket in the passing game. Kelly on the other hand can make do with just about any QB. How many coaches can make due with whatever they have on hand at the most important position on the field? In truth that is the only really major difference between them.
After a quick read, I thought it made sense to ask Opper about Notre Dame’s quarterback conundrum, where Kelly now has four legit options behind center, with Dayne Crist, Tommy Rees, Andrew Hendrix and Everett Golson all viable options.
Here’s Opper’s take:
I don’t think it really matters in the slightest who the QB for Kelly is. He is such a good teacher and has such a great eye for detail that he can work with any QB and make them look if not great then at least serviceable. At UC there were questions about whether he preferred a traditional pro style QB or a dual threat. I don’t think he has a preference for one style or the other. His teams certainly run the ball better with a dual threat under center. Ultimately the style of QB he likes is the style of whoever his best QB at the moment is. I know that sounds like a cop out. But Kelly has such unshakable faith in what he does offensively that he doesn’t really care who takes the snaps, he thinks he can make them win.
What’s interesting is that Opper seems to think of a guy like Tony Pike as the perfect quarterback for Kelly’s system, all while Irish fans seem to think a dual-threat player, someone in the mold of Golson or Hendrix, is what Kelly’s interested in bringing to South Bend. Of course, if you look at the Irish’s two major quarterback targets in this recruiting class, Maty Mauk and Gunner Kiel, you see that both of these guys bring two completely different skillsets to the table. Mauk is more of the dual-threat, prototype spread quarterback, while Kiel is the big-armed trigger man that can sit back in the pocket and throw. From Opper’s perspective, and apparently the coaching staff’s as well, Kelly thinks he can win with both.
One final observation, and hopefully something that’ll come into play more in season two. Opper took great pleasure in the amount of vertical shots that the Bearcats took down-field under Kelly. I don’t think there’s a Notre Dame fan out there who thought the Irish took enough deep shots, especially with a guy like Michael Floyd at his disposal.
- The good, the bad, the ugly: Notre Dame vs. Purdue 0
- Five things we learned: Notre Dame 30, Purdue 14 73
- Pregame Six Pack: An all Hoosiers Shamrock Series 39
- And in that corner… The Purdue Boilermakers 41
- Even after shutout, Irish hope best is yet to come for young D 69
- The good, the bad, the ugly: Notre Dame vs. Michigan 132