Barkley Woods

And in that corner… The USC Trojans


We’re a little over three days from the primetime affair with Lane Kiffin’s USC Trojans in Notre Dame Stadium. With subplots like the health of USC’s Marc Tyler and Notre Dame’s Ethan Johnson, recruiting battles being held on the Irish’s turf, and All-American wide receiver candidates like Michael Floyd and Robert Woods, this game doesn’t lack a compelling cast of characters, even if both teams are currently unranked in the national polls.

While we’ll do all the work getting you up to speed on the Irish heading into Saturday night’s game, we’ve got the Los Angeles Daily News’ Scott Wolf was kind enough to answer a few questions on Lane Kiffin and his Trojans. As someone that lives in the heart of Trojan territory, I can tell you there’s nobody that follows the team closer.

I asked, Scott answered. I might not be his favorite interviewer, but he obliged me anyway:

Inside the Irish: A quick state of the Trojans: This is the first 5-1 USC team that’s ever been unranked. But it isn’t just pollsters lukewarm on the Trojans. The Coliseum hasn’t been full and it’s clear that the buzz isn’t what it used to be. Is it the sanctions? Is it Kiffin? It is just Los Angeles? A year and a half into the Lane Kiffin era, where is the Trojan football program? 

Scott Wolf: USC is dealing with several issues right now. It no longer has Pete Carroll’s charisma to excite the fan base and it no longer has the talent to overwhelm opponents. People remain skeptical of Lane Kiffin. That may seem odd for a team with a 5-1 record but the schedule was not demanding the first half of the season. That said, a team with quarterback Matt Barkley, offensive tackle Matt Kalil and wide receiver Robert Woods (three likely first-round picks whenever they go pro) should be able to score points. And on top of all that, there is probation and no hope of a bowl game.

ITI: We’ve heard plenty about the injuries piling up on both sides of the ball for the Trojans. How limited will USC be on Saturday night? 

SW: Right now things look better than they did last week. Tailback Marc Tyler said he will try to play with a dislocated shoulder and perhaps more realisitically, wide receiver Marqise Lee’s sprained shoulder doesn’t appear as serious as originally feared.

Q: What do you make of the Trojans defensively? They’re 105th in the country against the pass. They’re a Top 20 statistical defense against the run, but haven’t played a team that’s close to ND on the ground. The Trojans did a nice job last year against an Irish offense far less productive than this one. How will USC try to stop Notre Dame’s balanced attack?

SW: USC’s struggled against teams with good quarterbacks and spread offenses the past two years. The defense usually tries to avoid giving up the big play. That is a safe approach but prevents sacks and plays that might change a game’s momentum. It is no accident USC allowed more than 40 points in back-to-back games for the first time in school history.

Q: You’ve seen a lot of both Matt Barkley and Robert Woods. How good are they? Do they match-up with the greats of the Carroll era? Are they top of the first round talent?

SW: It all depends on Barkley. He can make a great pass on one play and then deliver a stinker on the next. Woods is probably as good as any receiver in the Carroll except for perhaps Mike Williams. But he’s still got time to catch Williams. Barkley is not consistent enough to be compared to Carson Palmer, Matt Leinart or Mark Sanchez. He might not have the offensive lines those quarterbacks had but he needs to be more consistent. That said, he can still be a top of the first round pick simply because he is a quarterback. Woods should also be one.

Q: Kiffin called this game Notre Dame’s Super Bowl. That said, the Trojans are sitting out the postseason and still raw from last year’s defeat. Couldn’t you make the argument that this is USC’s Super Bowl? With Stanford, UW, Oregon and UCLA still on the Trojans’ schedule, where does this rivalry rank for the USC players and coaches?

SW: It’s a unique rivalry for the players because they usually know it is important without really understanding the rivalry. It is probably not as big to the players as UCLA because they see their players and fans on a daily basis. Oregon’s become a big rival because the programs joust atop the Pac-10 (now 12) and the Ducks have plenty of local players. But they realize this is at worst the second-biggest rival and one of the games the fans value. It is even bigger for Lane Kiffin because he does know how important this rivalry is and he felt the heat from losing last season, which snapped USC’s eight-game winning streak in the series.

Q: On the subject of Kiffin, he’s a polarizing guy. How do you grade the job he’s done at USC when you consider the hand that he was dealt? In the wake of the NCAA sanctions, what else could he do? Does his work on the sidelines live up to the work he does on the recruiting trail? 

SW: He definitely knows how to recruit with two top 5 classes already. The question is whether he can lead a program and inspire the team instead of just being a glorified offensive coordinator. I’d give him a C- right now. He does have to deal with NCAA sanctions but those penalties have not hurt the school’s recruiting so maybe he doesn’t have it so bad.


You can find Scott’s work just about anywhere: At the Daily News, on his Inside USC blog, and on Twitter.

Navy, Notre Dame will display mutual respect with uniforms

Keenan Reynolds, Isaac Rochell

The storied and important history of Notre Dame and Navy’s long-running rivalry will be on display this weekend, with the undefeated Midshipmen coming to South Bend this weekend.

On NBCSN, a half-hour documentary presentation will take a closer look, with “Onward Notre Dame: Mutual Respect” talking about everything from Notre Dame’s 43-year winning streak, to Navy’s revival, triggered by their victory in 2007. The episode will also talk about the rivalries ties to World War II, and how the Navy helped keep Notre Dame alive during wartime.

You can catch it on tonight at 6:30 p.m. ET on NBCSN or online in the same viewing window.

On the field, perhaps an even more unique gesture of respect is planned. With Under Armour the apparel partner for both Notre Dame and Navy, both teams will take the field wearing the same cleats, gloves and baselayers. Each team’s coaching staff will also be outfitted in the same sideline gear.

More from Monday’s press release:

For the first time in college football, two opponents take the field with the exact same Under Armour baselayer, gloves and cleats to pay homage to the storied history and brotherhood between their two schools. The baselayer features both Universities’ alma maters on the sleeves and glove palms with the words “respect, honor, tradition” as a reminder of their connection to each other. Both sidelines and coaches also will wear the same sideline gear as a sign of mutual admiration.​

Navy and Notre Dame will meet for the 89th time on Saturday, a rivalry that dates back to 1927. After the Midshipmen won three of four games starting in 2007, Notre Dame hopes to extend their current winning streak to five games on Saturday.

Here’s an early look at some of the gear:


The good, the bad and the ugly: Notre Dame vs. Clemson

Will Fuller, B.J. Goodson

For a variety of reasons, Notre Dame’s 24-22 loss stings a little bit more than usual. The self-inflicted mistakes. The horrible start in an electric environment. The dropped passes and the missed blocks. Not to mention the two failed two-point conversions.

On a night where Notre Dame needed to bring close to their best to leave Death Valley a victor, they brought nothing near it for the game’s first 45 minutes. And while they very nearly fought their way into overtime, it wasn’t enough to emerge victorious.

“If you told me we were going to turn the ball over four times, I would tell you that we were going to lose,” Kelly said to open his postgame comments. “You wouldn’t have to be a genius to figure that out. We turned the ball over four times and we lost.”

With that, the Irish drop to 4-1 on the season, and need to immediately turn their focus to Navy and their triple-option maestro Keenan Reynolds. So let’s put this one in a body bag and do our best to move on as we tackle the good, bad and ugly.



DeShone Kizer. The sophomore quarterback showed a lot of pose and resiliency on Saturday night, able to keep his cool when many of his teammates couldn’t seem to do the same. Kizer lead the Irish to a furious fourth quarter comeback that came up just short when he called his own number on a run-pass option play on Notre Dame’s second failed two-point conversion play.

“At the end of the day, we want to be a championship team, but champions don’t lose,” Kizer said after the game. “It sucks that we end the game the way we do after fighting back the way we fought back.”

Kelly had positive things to say about his sophomore quarterback, who threw for 321 yards, a large portion of those coming in the fourth quarter, when everybody in the stadium knew he’d be throwing the ball.

“I’m really proud of him. I’m proud of the way he competed,” Kelly said. “He played well enough for us to win, let’s put it that way.”


C.J. ProsiseNo, he couldn’t get on track in the running game—held to just three yards in the first half. But Prosise once again showed he was the team’s most reliable playmaker, getting loose out of the backfield and notching a 100-yard receiving game on just four catches.

Yes, his fumble to begin the second half didn’t help. But Prosise’s evolution as a football player—contributing big things even when the ground game was stuck in neutral—was a nice step forward. Keeping him involved in the short passing game could be a huge part of this offense moving forward.


Max Redfield. We’ve spent a lot of time demanding the former 5-star recruit start playing like one. And on Saturday night, I thought he did. Redfield led Notre Dame in tackles notching 14, including an astounding 11 solo stops. Kelly talked about Redfield’s performance on Sunday.

“This past weekend [was] probably played his best game since he’s been here at Notre Dame,” Kelly said. “There’s a standard for him now on film for how he can play this game and hopefully we can continue on this track.”

Most wondered if the safety play was going to be Notre Dame’s demise on Saturday evening, especially matched up against Clemson’s talented skill talent. Redfield took a major step forward on Saturday night, playing physical as a tackler, a nice step forward considering the cast on his hand.


Resiliency. No moral victories. But I was impressed by the resolve this football team showed, especially when they seemed so overwhelmed early in the football game.

If the Irish end up getting into a beauty pageant for a spot in the College Football Playoff, it’s worth noting that their one loss is a narrow defeat on the road, against what looks like one of the ACC’s top teams.

Of course, a close loss doesn’t matter if Notre Dame loses again. And Kelly shared that message with his captains postgame, acknowledging that there’s zero margin for error now.

“I met with the captains after the game and told them what they need to do to continue to work towards their goals and what their vision is for this football team,” Kelly said. “You can’t lose another game. You know, you’re on the clock now. Every single weekend you’re playing elimination football.”


Fifty-three minutes of defense. We touched on the play of the defense in our Five Things, but it’d be unfair to not mention it here. Outside of the first two series, Notre Dame’s defense played very well.

Sheldon Day and Isaac Rochell were tough in the trenches. Jaylon Smith was active at linebacker. Cole Luke made up for some early missed tackles with a game-turning interception and when Clemson got conservative in the fourth quarter protecting a lead, the Irish defense held strong.

“We can’t go on the road and be tentative defensively to start a game. After that, we played the kind of defense we expect to play here,” Kelly said postgame. “We played well enough after that first quarter, if you don’t have four turnovers.”



The first seven minutes. Notre Dame lost this football game not because Brian Kelly made a few controversial decisions on two-point conversions, but rather because the Irish showed zero composure in the game’s opening minutes.

Nothing went right in the game’s first seven minutes. Not on offense, not on defense, nor on special teams. And the result was a 14-point hole that Notre Dame just couldn’t dig itself out from.

This didn’t seem like a football team capable of a horrendous start. But Notre Dame didn’t answer the bell, and allowed Clemson’s crowd—and aggressive defense—to dictate terms for the first 30 minutes.


The turnovers. Kelly’s comments said it best. Notre Dame wasn’t winning a game where they turned it over four times. Worst still, it seemed like Irish ball security was faulty in critical times, with youngsters and veterans alike making the mistakes.

“If I knew, we certainly would’ve coached it more. But you’re talking about veteran players and rookies,” Kelly said. “[C.J. Sanders] looks dynamic on the first return, then turns it over…  Arguably two of your most veteran and decorated players, C.J. [Prosise] and Chris Brown, they know how to hold onto a ball, and they turn it over. And then DeShone tries to force a ball in there… If you turn it over, we’re not going to win games.”


The Drops. Yes, it was slippery and miserable out there. But it was for both teams. Notre Dame’s heralded receiving corps dropped a half-dozen passes, a crippling set of miscues that left a lot of yards (and points) out there.

Kelly calculated that the Irish left roughly 125 yards on the field, a number that certainly would’ve added to DeShone Kizer’s yardage total and would’ve turned Saturday night into a different outcome.

Corey Robinson has been known for his velcro hands. On Saturday, two drops arguably cost the Irish a touchdown and a must-have two-point conversion. Will Fuller was held to two catches, letting a third down conversion go through his hands. Fuller’s drop highlighted the one deficiency in his game, something former NFL director of college scouting Greg Gabriel pointed out on Twitter last night.

It was Fuller and Chris Brown who started some of the trash-talk opportunities with their Twitter comments. They couldn’t back it up this week.


The Offensive Line. This was probably the most disappointing part of Saturday night. Notre Dame’s offensive front got absolutely mauled in the first half, getting zero push and giving up nine tackles behind the line of scrimmage. Clemson’s defensive ends had seven TFLs themselves. Yes, the Tigers loaded the box and played aggressively downhill. But there wasn’t a single soul inside or out of the Notre Dame program that didn’t expect that.

After being able to dictate terms through four games, the Irish turned into a one-dimensional, finesse front five. We spent all offseason saying that wouldn’t be the case with this group. While they were playing in mud and slop and in conditions that were deafening, the Irish just couldn’t establish the running game early, a necessity to winning.

With the game on the line and Kizer showing confidence in his offensive front, Notre Dame chose to run for the tie. They couldn’t get it done.



The pain of losing. It’s been since November since Notre Dame lost a football game. And in those 10-plus months, we forgot what it was like to watch a team fail to win.

If you’re looking for people to blame, you had a fun night. Most have turned to the man atop the program. They’ll say Kelly failed to prepare his team, or blew the game by chasing points. They’ll cite a seven-figure salary when complaining about unoriginality near the goal line or a failure to read a two-point conversion chart.

In hindsight, it’s certainly hard to argue with the detractors, especially when two Justin Yoon extra points would’ve pushed the game into overtime. (Then again, if Corey Robinson reels in a wide-open two point try, Yoon’s kicking for the win.)

Yet in torrents of rain and a game that seemingly went wrong at every early turn, Notre Dame nearly pulled it out. And that says a lot about the program Kelly has built, as much anything Kelly did wrong from his spot on the sidelines.

In a close football game, many of the 50-50 decisions that are made determine the difference between winning and losing. But focusing on the minutiae distracts you from the autopsy results.

Notre Dame lost because of the blunt force trauma that comes from four turnovers. And from a half-dozen dropped passes. Not to mention an offensive line that couldn’t win at the point of attack and a slow start by the defense.

So while everybody’s looking for someone to blame, that’s the pain of losing. And we might have all forgotten that over the last 10 months.