Manti Te'o junior

With Te’o’s return, 2012 front seven looks solid


Manti Te’o‘s return means a lot of things to the Irish. Off the field, Notre Dame will have one of the nation’s premiere student-athletes representing their university. An All-American on and off the field, Te’o will be the unquestioned face of the program heading into a season that’ll have the Irish on center stage.

The decision to come back took many people by surprise, especially with news leaking late Sunday night after an awards banquet in Newport Beach for the Lott IMPACT Award. But Te’o had a chance to discuss the pros and cons of leaving and staying with his family, and in the end the junior couldn’t turn down playing his senior season in South Bend. Te’o discussed some of the reasons that went into coming back for his senior season during an official interview with

“This was a tough decision, and I found myself praying about it often,” Te’o said. “Ultimately, I really want to experience my senior year at Notre Dame. The happiest moments so far in my life have come when I am spending time with people I love. I wanted to spend another year with my teammates and the coaches on our team. I don’t think any sum of money can replace the memories I can create in my senior year.

“Graduating from Notre Dame is really important to me. Many people encouraged me to go to the NFL because I could always earn my diploma later in life. If I did that, though, I would not have the chance for the same experiences that are ahead of me in my senior year, and I would not have finished at Notre Dame with the guys I started with and care so much about. When I weighed all the factors that went into this decision, it just felt right to stay at Notre Dame.”

Off the field, there’s nothing I could write about Te’o that hasn’t already been said. As Brian Kelly appropriately said, “This is not only a great day for the University of Notre Dame and our football team, it is also a great day for college football.”

But before we get carried away with the ambassador that Te’o is, let’s talk about what his return means to a unit that is shaping up to be one of the most dynamic front sevens in recent Irish memory.

Put simply, with Te’o back, the Irish have the engine that’ll power this defense. Losing Ethan Johnson and Darius Fleming won’t be easy for the Irish coaching staff to stomach, but the Irish couldn’t be in better shape to deal with their departures.

Here’s a quick breakdown of the anticipated depth chart:

2012 Projected Defensive Front Seven

Kapron Lewis-Moore, Grad Student
Stephon Tuitt, Soph.
Aaron Lynch, Soph.
Chase Hounshell, Soph.
Kona Schwenke, Jr.
Jaron Jones, Fr.

Notes: There’s really an embarrassment of riches at defensive end for the Irish, even before you consider a guy like Jones, who’ll likely push for playing time. With Lewis-Moore and Tuitt, the Irish have two bruising 3-4 run-stuffing defensive ends. With Lynch, the Irish have a pass rusher who should see his production increase exponentially. At the very least the Irish can go three deep with impact players, with guys like Hounshell ready to push into the rotation as well.

Sean Cwynar, Grad Student
Louis Nix, Jr.
Tony Springmann, Soph.
Sheldon Day, Fr.

Notes: You’ve got to expect Cwynar back, especially when you look at the depth chart logically. He’s a perfect complement to Nix, who should be ready to take his game to the next level after an impressive first-year campaign. The staff is high on Springmann who offers another mammoth body in the middle, and I’m excited to see what Day can do when he gets to campus. In years past, Day would be the signature recruit that has Irish fans salivating. This year? He’s just another guy.

Prince Shembo, Jr.
Danny Spond, Jr.
Troy Niklas, Soph.
Ishaq Williams, Soph.
Ben Councell, Soph.
Anthony Rabasa, Soph.
Romeo Okwara, Fr.

Notes: There’s less depth here than you’d think. In all likelihood, Shembo will take over for Fleming at the Cat linebacker position, or at least will compete for the job with Williams, who spelled Fleming this season as a raw but impressive freshman. You’ve got to think that Niklas will get the first chance to start at the Dog backer, with Spond potentially running out of time to make a difference as a position player. If there’s a guy that’s a wildcard, it’s Councell, who saved a year of eligibility, but profiled as a perfect field-side linebacker. The Irish aren’t done recruiting this position either.

Manti Te’o, Sr.
Dan Fox, Sr.
Carlo Calabrese, Sr.
Kendall Moore, Jr.
Justin Utupo, Jr.
Jarrett Grace, Soph.

Notes: Without Te’o, this group feels filled with question marks. With Te’o, it feels filled with depth. Instead of wondering if Kendall Moore can take Te’o’s place, now the question is how do the Irish find snaps for the talented rising junior. With Fox and Calabrese both returning, the Irish have three interior linebackers that know the ins and outs of Bob Diaco’s system, depth at a position that’s plagued Notre Dame for nearly a decade.

The recipe for protecting a painfully young secondary is an impressive front seven. With Te’o in the middle of the group, expect Bob Diaco and his front seven to protect the back-end of the defense.





Only focus after Clemson loss is winning on Saturday

SOUTH BEND, IN - SEPTEMBER 19: Head coach Brian Kelly of the Notre Dame Fighting Irish looks on against the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets in the second quarter at Notre Dame Stadium on September 19, 2015 in South Bend, Indiana. Notre Dame defeated Georgia Tech 30-22. (Photo by Joe Robbins/Getty Images)

The 2015 college football season has yet to showcase a truly great football team. With early title contenders like Ohio State and Michigan State looking less than stellar, Alabama losing a game already and the Pac-12 beating itself up, the chance that a one-loss Notre Dame team could still make it into the College Football Playoff is certainly a possibility.

But don’t expect Brian Kelly and his football team to start worrying about that now.

We saw a similar situation unfold last season, after the Irish lost a heartbreaker in the final seconds against Florida State. With many fans worried that Notre Dame wasn’t given credit for their performance in Tallahassee, the Irish’s playoff resume mattered very little as the team fell apart down the stretch.

As Notre Dame looks forward, their focus only extends to Saturday. That’s when Navy will test the Irish with their triple-option attack and better-than-usual defense, a team that Brian Kelly voted into his Top 25 this week.

Can this team make it to the Playoff? Kelly isn’t sure. But he knows what his team has to do.

“I don’t know,” Kelly said when asked about a one-loss entrance. “But we do know what we can control, and that is winning each week. So what we really talked about is we have no margin for error, and we have to pay attention to every detail.

“Each game is the biggest and most important game we play and really focusing on that. It isn’t concern yourself with big picture. You really have to focus on one week at a time.”

Kelly spread that message to his five captains after the game on Saturday night. He’s optimistic that message has set in over the weekend, and he’ll see how the team practices as they begin their on-field preparations for Navy this afternoon.

But when asked what type of response he wants to see from his team this week, it wasn’t about the minutiae of the week or a company line about daily improvement.

“The response is to win. That’s the response that we’re looking for,” Kelly said, before detailing four major factors to victory. “To win football games, you have to start fast, which we did not. There has to be an attention to detail, which certainly we were missing that at times. We got great effort, and we finished strong. So we were missing two of the four real key components that I’ll be looking for for this weekend. As long as we have those four key components, I’ll take a win by one. That would be fine with me. We need those four key components. That’s what I’ll be looking for.”

Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.