Mike McGinchey

Mike McGlinchey commits, filling Irish offensive line haul


Oh to be a Notre Dame fan three weeks ago. To listen to some, the program was lost as sea, all but forgotten by the nation’s elite players as the team veered further and further into the abyss. With Michigan accepting recruiting commitments by the half-dozen, and Urban Meyer simply waiting for ND to identify his targets, Brian Kelly and his scrappy lads were at a high stakes poker game and dealing dead without even knowing it. The end was near, and the worst part was Kelly, athletic director Jack Swarbrick, and the players didn’t even know it.

Perhaps it was for the best. If those inside the program wasted their time dealing with the worries that have plagued fans since that loss to Florida State, they’d have never put this program on the veritable roll that it is on now. In a recruiting game known mostly for momentum, the Irish seized it this weekend, picking up their third offensive line commitment in the last 36 hours with the commitment of mammoth offensive tackle Mike McGlinchey, from Philadelphia.

After reeling in a stagger 159 inches of offensive linemen in Colin McGovern and Hunter Bivin (standing 6-7 and 6-8 respectively), offensive line coach Harry Heistand accepted the commitment of six-foot-nine, 280-pound McGlinchey this afternoon.

McGlinchey chose the Irish over programs like Penn State, Michigan, Florida, Florida State, Iowa, and Miami. He was actually on his way to visit Wisconsin when he committed to the Irish, turning around and heading back to South Bend for more time with the Irish staff before heading home. Earlier this month, it seemed McGlinchey was all but destined for Penn State, though he denied he was a heavy lean, and proved that today.

Christian McCollum of IrishSportsDaily.com was able to catch up with the offensive tackle prospect this afternoon to get an update.

“I talked it over with my dad in the car and I decided to commit to Notre Dame today,” McGlinchey told ISD. “I decided it’s the right place for me and it’s a dream come true to be able to be a member of the Notre Dame football team.”

Notre Dame told its offensive line targets that it planned on taking four linemen in the class, likely helping McGlinchey jump on board and snatch up his offer before it went somewhere else. In a span of 36 hours, the Irish essentially closed out the most important position on their recruiting boards, doing it by landing three prospects with elite offers and really impressive size. That the Irish closed both McGlinchey and McGovern this weekend — both guys that didn’t seem imminent — might put an end to the worries about Harry Hiestand the recruiter. (It’ll also put an end to those crying for the Irish to chase more “profile” recruits. With last names like McGlinchey and McGovern, how much more in profile can they get?)

What the Irish are doing with their offensive line under Brian Kelly is pretty amazing. Just a quick look at the roster shows you how they’ve transformed what they’re looking for, finding players bigger and stronger than ever before. Fifth-year centers Braxston Cave and Mike Golic, and guard Chris Watt are the only linemen shorter than six-foot-four. All three were Charlie Weis recruits. Of the linemen Kelly has brought in, only freshman Nick Martin is shorter than six-foot-five, with Matt Hegarty, who many profiled as a tackle entering college, coming in as a 6-foot-5, 290-pound center.

With a spread attack, many assumed the staff would look for smaller, athletic players to work in the system. Yet Kelly has found bigger, athletic bodies, with Tate Nichols — a converted tight end — and now a 6-foot-8, 320-pound right tackle, the first Kelly recruit in line to start. With recruits the size of Steve Elmer, McGovern, McGlinchey and Bivin (none shorter than a reported 6-foot-6), it’ll be interesting if all four end up as tackles, positions they seem perfect fits.

McGlinchey is the Irish’s sixth commitment of the 2013 class.

Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.



Navy, Notre Dame will display mutual respect with uniforms

Keenan Reynolds, Isaac Rochell

The storied and important history of Notre Dame and Navy’s long-running rivalry will be on display this weekend, with the undefeated Midshipmen coming to South Bend this weekend.

On NBCSN, a half-hour documentary presentation will take a closer look, with “Onward Notre Dame: Mutual Respect” talking about everything from Notre Dame’s 43-year winning streak, to Navy’s revival, triggered by their victory in 2007. The episode will also talk about the rivalries ties to World War II, and how the Navy helped keep Notre Dame alive during wartime.

You can catch it on tonight at 6:30 p.m. ET on NBCSN or online in the same viewing window.

On the field, perhaps an even more unique gesture of respect is planned. With Under Armour the apparel partner for both Notre Dame and Navy, both teams will take the field wearing the same cleats, gloves and baselayers. Each team’s coaching staff will also be outfitted in the same sideline gear.

More from Monday’s press release:

For the first time in college football, two opponents take the field with the exact same Under Armour baselayer, gloves and cleats to pay homage to the storied history and brotherhood between their two schools. The baselayer features both Universities’ alma maters on the sleeves and glove palms with the words “respect, honor, tradition” as a reminder of their connection to each other. Both sidelines and coaches also will wear the same sideline gear as a sign of mutual admiration.​

Navy and Notre Dame will meet for the 89th time on Saturday, a rivalry that dates back to 1927. After the Midshipmen won three of four games starting in 2007, Notre Dame hopes to extend their current winning streak to five games on Saturday.

Here’s an early look at some of the gear: