Atkinson 3

Counting down the Irish: 15-11


Now that we’ve got our math mistakes cleaned up, let’s get back to some analysis of the Top 25 so far. The inclusion of Zeke Motta at No. 25 makes plenty of sense, and if there’s a breakout senior waiting to make his name, Motta is a pretty good candidate. Playing in the shadow of Harrison Smith, Motta has seen plenty of action for two solid seasons, and should feel comfortable anchoring the secondary, regardless of where Jamoris Slaughter is lined up.

A snapshot of the top 10 names on the list shows the Irish program seems to be in good shape for the future. Of the names listed, only Motta and Toma are finishing their eligibility this season, adding credence to the thought that 2013 might be a very promising year for the Irish.

More evidence that the youth of this roster is its strength comes from names 15-11. Once again, all five players listed will have eligibility remaining after ’12, and three are true sophomores. On-field experience might be the weakness of this group, with Chris Watt entering camp entrenched at his guard position, and Prince Shembo in and out of the starting lineup last season.

The third and final quarterback of the rankings slots his way in here, with Everett Golson coming in at No. 14. Golson, who redshirted during his freshman season, impressed during the Blue-Gold game, but also showed difficulties with game management duties and ball security, two very large issues that seem to be sticking points for Brian Kelly and new offensive coordinator Chuck Martin.  Still, anybody who doesn’t think Golson is going to find his way into the Irish offensive package is fooling themselves, and even if he isn’t the “starting” quarterback, expect to see a healthy dose of Golson in the Irish game plan.

Once again, here’s our voting panel:

Eric Hansen, South Bend Tribune @HansenSouthBend
John Walters, The Daily @jdubs88
John Vannie,
Eric Murtaugh, representing  @OneFootDown
Ryan Ritter, representing @HLS_NDtex
Keith Arnold,’s Inside the Irish @KeithArnoldNBC

Here’s the list as it stands:

IRISH 2012 Top 25
25. Zeke Motta (S, Sr.)
24. Tommy Rees (QB, Jr.)
23. Andrew Hendrix (QB, Jr.)
22. Davonte Neal (WR, Fr.)
21. TJ Jones (WR, Jr.)
20. Robby Toma (WR, Sr.)
19. Christian Lombard (OL, Jr.)
18. Davaris Daniels (WR, So.)
17. Troy Niklas (TE, So.)
16. Bennett Jackson (CB, Jr.)


15. Ishaq Williams (OLB, So.) After putting together the least impressive freshman season out of the “big three” defensive recruits, Williams turned it on this spring, taking advantage of Prince Shembo’s injury and rededicating himself to football after bouts of homesickness. Physically gifted, Williams is the prototype of what the Irish want in a ‘Cat’ linebacker, and has looked good enough in space that Bob Diaco might not hesitate to put he and Prince Shembo on the edges together. With some of the best pass rush potential on the roster, Williams could help this unit get more heat on the quarterback this season, something missing last year.

(Highest ranking: 9th. Lowest ranking: 20th)

14. Everett Golson (QB, So.) We’ll find out soon whether or not this ranking is a product of optimism or talent. Golson, a record-setting prep quarterback that sat out last season after enrolling early, has all the tools to be a perfect fit in Brian Kelly’s spread offense. He might not be as fast as Irish fans hope (he clocked a 4.8 forty during spring testing), but he’s elusive enough to supply a running threat at quarterback and has plenty of arm to make any throw in this offense. While rumors of ball security problems were semi-confirmed during the Blue-Gold game, so was the talent that make putting the keys to the offense in his hands a promising proposition.

(Highest ranking: 5th. Lowest ranking: 20th)

13. Chris Watt (LG, Sr.) At 6-foot-3, 310-pounds, Watt fits the profile of a left guard perfectly, and his first season starting showed him an effective partner with Zack Martin on the left side of the line. With a year of experience under his belt, not to mention another year with Paul Longo, Watt should be ready to thrive under new offensive line coach Harry Hiestand, who preaches a physicality that jives with the type of football the Illinois native likes to play. If Watt and Lombard play up to their potential, and the Irish find one more piece on the right side of the offensive line, this could be a very effective unit.

(Highest ranking: 6th. Lowest ranking: Unranked)

12. Prince Shembo (OLB, Jr.) Shembo’s lofty rating surprises me, yet also give you an idea of the pass rush potential the rising junior has. Playing mostly out of position at drop linebacker last season, it wasn’t a lost sophomore year, but a step back, as he logged only two sacks after having 4.5 during his rookie campaign. With Darius Fleming graduated, Shembo will likely step into the ‘Cat’ linebacker spot, though a foot injury this spring gave Ishaq Williams plenty of time to get comfortable there. Still, with Aaron Lynch no longer on the roster, Shembo might be best suited to put a hand on the ground and chase the quarterback. He’s not big enough to play end in the 3-4, but when the Irish slide a fourth man down, Shembo could be at his best rushing the passer.

(Highest ranking: 8th. Lowest ranking: 18th)

11. George Atkinson III (RB, So.) You wonder where Atkinson would be in these rankings if it weren’t for his electric spring game performance. Even without it, the 215-pound speedster would’ve surely tallied his share of votes thanks to his work in the Irish return game, where his two touchdowns tied a school record. Cierre Wood may be the starting running back and Theo Riddick will certainly deserve carries, but the homerun threat in the Irish backfield is Atkinson. Whether it’s from behind center or split wide, expect the offense to put an emphasis on getting Atkinson touches, and his world-class blend of power and speed should do the rest. Ball security issues aside (and that’s a big assumption), Atkinson showing comfort lined up in the backfield was the best surprise of the spring.

(Highest ranking: 5th. Lowest ranking: 17th)

Only focus after Clemson loss is winning on Saturday

SOUTH BEND, IN - SEPTEMBER 19: Head coach Brian Kelly of the Notre Dame Fighting Irish looks on against the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets in the second quarter at Notre Dame Stadium on September 19, 2015 in South Bend, Indiana. Notre Dame defeated Georgia Tech 30-22. (Photo by Joe Robbins/Getty Images)
Leave a comment

The 2015 college football season has yet to showcase a truly great football team. With early title contenders like Ohio State and Michigan State looking less than stellar, Alabama losing a game already and the Pac-12 beating itself up, the chance that a one-loss Notre Dame team could still make it into the College Football Playoff is certainly a possibility.

But don’t expect Brian Kelly and his football team to start worrying about that now.

We saw a similar situation unfold last season, after the Irish lost a heartbreaker in the final seconds against Florida State. With many fans worried that Notre Dame wasn’t given credit for their performance in Tallahassee, the Irish’s playoff resume mattered very little as the team fell apart down the stretch.

As Notre Dame looks forward, their focus only extends to Saturday. That’s when Navy will test the Irish with their triple-option attack and better-than-usual defense, a team that Brian Kelly voted into his Top 25 this week.

Can this team make it to the Playoff? Kelly isn’t sure. But he knows what his team has to do.

“I don’t know,” Kelly said when asked about a one-loss entrance. “But we do know what we can control, and that is winning each week. So what we really talked about is we have no margin for error, and we have to pay attention to every detail.

“Each game is the biggest and most important game we play and really focusing on that. It isn’t concern yourself with big picture. You really have to focus on one week at a time.”

Kelly spread that message to his five captains after the game on Saturday night. He’s optimistic that message has set in over the weekend, and he’ll see how the team practices as they begin their on-field preparations for Navy this afternoon.

But when asked what type of response he wants to see from his team this week, it wasn’t about the minutiae of the week or a company line about daily improvement.

“The response is to win. That’s the response that we’re looking for,” Kelly said, before detailing four major factors to victory. “To win football games, you have to start fast, which we did not. There has to be an attention to detail, which certainly we were missing that at times. We got great effort, and we finished strong. So we were missing two of the four real key components that I’ll be looking for for this weekend. As long as we have those four key components, I’ll take a win by one. That would be fine with me. We need those four key components. That’s what I’ll be looking for.”

Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.