Everett Golson

Game Day: No. 4 Notre Dame vs. Pittsburgh


Another Saturday, another opportunity for No. 4 Notre Dame to continue winning, and potentially convert some doubters on he way. With the Irish robust favorites this afternoon with the line set at 17-points, the Notre Dame offense needs to build on its efficiency against Oklahoma while the defense needs to continue dominating.

We’ll be live-blogging and answering your questions in the NBC Sports video player, but until then, let’s run through a few final items before this afternoon’s kickoff.

Which Everett Golson will show up? Will it be the one that’s played like a savvy veteran on the road or the young and inexperienced quarterback that’s tried to do too much inside Notre Dame Stadium.

At this point, you’d expect Golson’s momentum from Oklahoma to carry over, but until you see it happen you can just wait and see.

Can this football team play better at home? One of the interesting items to follow this week was Brian Kelly talking about playing better at home. While not necessarily tip-toeing around the issue, Kelly has tweaked the pep rally time, and continued to work to make the team’s pregame routine more conducive to playing well.

“We want to make sure that Friday and Saturday is not the Super Bowl,” Kelly said. “Parents asking for tickets. I was here two weeks ago and we had two or three players giving tours of the Gug. We just have to kind of bring that in a little bit. We’ve looked at our schedule, for example, we’ve moved up the pep rally an hour. Our team will go in and get to the hotel an hour earlier, just to have some more time and some down time. We’re looking at how we condense the 48 hours a little more to have some down time.

“It’s been educational for me, too. I’ve gone back and forth with the different routines. Here’s what’s not going away: the pep rally’s not going away, the mass is not going away, the walk’s not going away. So how do you manage your day to give them that opportunity to be relaxed so they can be focused strictly on the football game? We’re still evolving there. No question, for me and the younger players, we’re starting to figure this out where we can come up with a  weekend so they’re not so distracted.”

With a full allotment of running backs, can the Irish utilize all of them? George Atkinson will be back returning kicks and in the offensive backfield. Cierre Wood just ran for over 10 yards a carry against Oklahoma. And Theo Riddick iced the game with a physical touchdown run. Heck, Cam McDaniel has showed he’s a guy that needs to find his way onto the field as well.

Now the challenge will be for Brian Kelly and Chuck Martin to find roles for their stable of running backs and formulate a game plan that utilizes them to the best of their ability.

One item to watch: Can this staff break its own habit of type-casting and get the ball into the hands of Wood or Atkinson via pass instead of just relying on Riddick?

Can the defense make Tino Sunseri play less efficient football? It’s been a night and day change for Pitt quarterback Tino Sunseri, who played a mediocre junior season in Todd Graham’s speed offense and is now playing some of the nation’s most efficient football.

But the Irish defensive front is a tough match-up for Pitt’s offensive line, now short starting right guard Ryan Schlieper. Two inexperienced tackles and a back-up guard aren’t the best recipe for a defensive front that features Stephon Tuitt and Louis Nix, and while Sunseri has some decent mobility, he’ll be a target for a pass rush that could do some damage today. A few weeks ago Syracuse had five sacks. Earlier in the year they allowed six to Cincinnati. The Irish front seven is much better than those two units.

Will Tyler Eifert finally break out? There’s certainly no blaming Eifert for his production this season. And while his numbers aren’t as gaudy as the ones he put up during his junior season, he’s doing probably more now to impress NFL scouts than ever before.

Still, Eifert and Golson need to find some chemistry. And this afternoon is as good of time as any to start.

Will Notre Dame take care of business? Elite football teams put challengers like this in the ground quickly. If Notre Dame wants to live up to their No. 4 ranking, they need to win and do so with style points, so they can put comments like this to rest.

“My personal tiebreaker is that a conference championship game has to stand for something,” CBS’ Gary Danielson said earlier this week, not surprisingly stumping for the SEC. “I would penalize Notre Dame for not playing in a conference championship. So after Alabama, my first nod would be to Oregon, since its conference has earned respect, then Kansas State and only then Notre Dame.”

A few thousand words probably wouldn’t do this quote justice, so leaving it be is probably the best course of action.

But that’s the type of thing Notre Dame needs to battle. Because in case you didn’t realize it, a conference championship game is worth more than games against Western Kentucky, Florida Atlantic, and Western Carolina, a 1-8 team that’s winless in the Southern Conference.

Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.



Navy, Notre Dame will display mutual respect with uniforms

Keenan Reynolds, Isaac Rochell

The storied and important history of Notre Dame and Navy’s long-running rivalry will be on display this weekend, with the undefeated Midshipmen coming to South Bend this weekend.

On NBCSN, a half-hour documentary presentation will take a closer look, with “Onward Notre Dame: Mutual Respect” talking about everything from Notre Dame’s 43-year winning streak, to Navy’s revival, triggered by their victory in 2007. The episode will also talk about the rivalries ties to World War II, and how the Navy helped keep Notre Dame alive during wartime.

You can catch it on tonight at 6:30 p.m. ET on NBCSN or online in the same viewing window.

On the field, perhaps an even more unique gesture of respect is planned. With Under Armour the apparel partner for both Notre Dame and Navy, both teams will take the field wearing the same cleats, gloves and baselayers. Each team’s coaching staff will also be outfitted in the same sideline gear.

More from Monday’s press release:

For the first time in college football, two opponents take the field with the exact same Under Armour baselayer, gloves and cleats to pay homage to the storied history and brotherhood between their two schools. The baselayer features both Universities’ alma maters on the sleeves and glove palms with the words “respect, honor, tradition” as a reminder of their connection to each other. Both sidelines and coaches also will wear the same sideline gear as a sign of mutual admiration.​

Navy and Notre Dame will meet for the 89th time on Saturday, a rivalry that dates back to 1927. After the Midshipmen won three of four games starting in 2007, Notre Dame hopes to extend their current winning streak to five games on Saturday.

Here’s an early look at some of the gear: