Brian Kelly, Ara Parseghian, Lou Holtz

Weekend notes: Awards, Ara, and Swarbrick


If you didn’t have a chance to catch last night’s college football awards show, you missed two-plus hours of honoring Notre Dame. With Brian Kelly winning the coach of the year, Lou Holtz presenting Ara Parseghian with a lifetime achievement award, and Manti Te’o pulling in even more hardware, Notre Dame’s resurgence was on full display on ESPN, a network that’s enjoyed touting both the highs and lows of recent years.

From one awards show to the next, Notre Dame will hold their annual football awards show Friday night, a celebration that’ll certainly be more joyous as the Irish commemorate an undefeated regular season, instead of back-to-back eight-win years. Tune in for offensive and defensive players of the year, newcomer of the year, scout team players of the year, and guardian of the year. (There might even be some added awards… that’s part of the fun!)

The banquet — streamed live on — will also be part of a huge recruiting weekend for Notre Dame. A large contingency of the 2013 recruiting class will be in town, many taking their official visits. But the biggest recruit in town will be the lone uncommitted prospect: Five-star running back Greg Bryant.

Bryant will get his first look at South Bend this weekend, taking in the banquet surrounded by close to a dozen committed recruits in his class. He’s already built a fast friendship with position coach Tony Alford, and will walk onto campus with the ability to earn immediate playing time, with Theo Riddick and Cierre Wood both seniors, and Wood looking as if he’ll join Riddick in the NFL next year.

Bryant is the top running back prospect the Irish have been close to landing since James Aldridge, and the powerful back looks like he’s ready-made to step onto a college campus and contribute.



If you missed last night’s ESPN broadcast, you missed Ara Parseghian‘s emotional acceptance speech after earning an achievement award for his enduring work long after his retirement from coaching football. As someone too young to truly understand Parseghian’s role in Notre Dame’s lore, it was a tremendous look at a man still incredibly vibrant at the age of 89.

With his family joining him in the front row, Parseghian wowed the crowd with a speech that would’ve had just about every locker room ready for battle. With ESPN’s Tom Rinaldi holding the microphone, it was Parseghian that controlled the conversation with ESPN’s king of schmaltz, addressing the players and crowd with passion as he talked about the battle of his lifetime: finding a cure for Niemann-Pick Type C, a genetic, neurodegenerative disorder that claimed the lives of three of his grandchildren.

Parseghian had the chance to be a true great of the coaching profession, guiding the Irish to multiple national championships before walking away from coaching at the age of 51. In an era where coaches are often hailed as great men for the work they do with their teams on the field, Parseghian appears to be one of the last fine men to be rightfully defined by both his greatness as an on-field tactician, as well as for his philanthropic efforts, raising more than $40 million in research towards finding a cure for an incredibly cruel disorder that cut short the lives of his grandchildren.

Parseghian will likely stay in the headlines for the next month, as football fans look back at his historic 24-23 victory over Bear Bryant’s Alabama team in 1973, a national championship win the year before Parseghian beat Bryant in the Orange Bowl before walking away from the game.

But his work fighting one of life’s truly unfair diseases, and his willingness to walk away from the spotlight of the sidelines to do more with his life is one of the truly great stories associated with Notre Dame.

“One of the most difficult things is when you know the child’s got a terminal disease and you’re trying to find a cure, you’re looking for a silver bullet, and you know each day they’re deteriorating,” Parseghian told Gannett News Services’ Mike Lopresti. “To watch that happen is an agonizing experience. In our lives, nothing compares to that, even the euphoria of a national championship.”


Talking the subject back to recruiting, it’s interesting to note that after years of hearing Notre Dame fans complain about routinely downgrading the Irish’s recruiting class, this year’s group has actually gotten better with time.

As rankings usually ebb and flow throughout the “evaluation process,” the common complaint was that Notre Dame recruits often times would see their stock downgraded as things got closer and closer to national signing day.

Looking at Notre Dame’s record the last few years, you certainly can’t blame Rivals for downgrading the talent that ultimately underperformed in South Bend for the past decade. Yet this recruiting class, not a group that started super star heavy, has actually seen its stock rise over the past few months.


Lastly, Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick was interviewed by Jack Nolan on and talked about the Irish’s achievement of being No. 1 in the BCS and No. 1 in the Graduation Success Rate (GSR), one of the NCAA’s guiding academic indicators.

It’s a tremendous achievement, and Swarbrick’s position on it was incredibly interesting.

“It’s the way we always wanted to get there,” Swarbrick told Nolan. “I talk often of proof of concept, and we always wanted to prove that when we restored the football program that the cost of doing that wasn’t a lessening of our commitment to education. And we have statistical evidence of that this year.

“To be able to say we’re No. 1 in the BCS and we are No. 1 in the Graduation Success Rate at the same time, and no one has ever done that, and it’s going to be very hard for someone else to do that in the future, is a real milestone.”

Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.



Navy, Notre Dame will display mutual respect with uniforms

Keenan Reynolds, Isaac Rochell

The storied and important history of Notre Dame and Navy’s long-running rivalry will be on display this weekend, with the undefeated Midshipmen coming to South Bend this weekend.

On NBCSN, a half-hour documentary presentation will take a closer look, with “Onward Notre Dame: Mutual Respect” talking about everything from Notre Dame’s 43-year winning streak, to Navy’s revival, triggered by their victory in 2007. The episode will also talk about the rivalries ties to World War II, and how the Navy helped keep Notre Dame alive during wartime.

You can catch it on tonight at 6:30 p.m. ET on NBCSN or online in the same viewing window.

On the field, perhaps an even more unique gesture of respect is planned. With Under Armour the apparel partner for both Notre Dame and Navy, both teams will take the field wearing the same cleats, gloves and baselayers. Each team’s coaching staff will also be outfitted in the same sideline gear.

More from Monday’s press release:

For the first time in college football, two opponents take the field with the exact same Under Armour baselayer, gloves and cleats to pay homage to the storied history and brotherhood between their two schools. The baselayer features both Universities’ alma maters on the sleeves and glove palms with the words “respect, honor, tradition” as a reminder of their connection to each other. Both sidelines and coaches also will wear the same sideline gear as a sign of mutual admiration.​

Navy and Notre Dame will meet for the 89th time on Saturday, a rivalry that dates back to 1927. After the Midshipmen won three of four games starting in 2007, Notre Dame hopes to extend their current winning streak to five games on Saturday.

Here’s an early look at some of the gear: