Eddie Vanderdoes

Big recruiting weekend begins home stretch


It’s a winter wonderland in South Bend. With the first big snowfall of the new year falling earlier this week, Notre Dame will welcome four important guests to a very picturesque campus. For the four warm weather state recruits, a January weekend with temperatures in the 20s will pull no punches, giving kids a true picture of winter at its finest. But with less than two weeks to go before Signing Day, there’s good reason for highly touted players to give Notre Dame one of their last looks.

With 22 current commitments, there’s not a ton of room left on the bus. Earlier this week, one more prospective player took himself out of contention, with California wideout Sebastian Larue declaring the Irish out of the running. Multiple reports had Larue’s offer still contingent on some work in the classroom, and many believe the parting was mutual.

Let’s take a closer look at the four targets making their way to South Bend this weekend.


Kylie Fitts, DE: 6-4, 260 lbs.

Fitts was long committed to USC until earlier this month, when Fitts was reportedly told he no longer had a spot to early enroll. After graduating early from high school, the Southern California native opened up his recruitment and Notre Dame was there from then on.

A USC Army All-American, Fitts looks like a prototype defensive end for the Irish, though he’ll need to continue to put on weight. Fitts is still considering UCLA, Oregon and Washington, with staying on the West Coast seemingly likely, but all bets are off until he finally visits Notre Dame’s campus.

Fitts might not be a huge need in the recruiting class, but Brian Kelly and Bob Diaco seem happy to stockpile big bodies. With Kapron Lewis-Moore moving on and Stephon Tuitt likely with a tough decision to make after next season, adding another defensive end — especially a top 150 player in the country — would be a good move.



Deon Hollins, LB: 6-2, 225 lbs.

Hollins received a visit from Bob Diaco and Kerry Cooks this week, with the result an official visit set for the weekend. In Hollins, they have a player that’s a little bit outside profile, but he’s got pass rush skills that would immediately make an impact for the Irish.

Hollins is committed to UCLA, but taking visits the next two weekends. “Me and my dad and my family thought it’d be smart to weigh our options, visit other places, just make sure that UCLA is the right place for us,” Hollins said earlier this week.

Getting Hollins away from UCLA would be a major feat for the Irish coaching staff, especially with the Bruins recruiting class looking stronger by the day. But when the Irish staff fawns over Hollins’ pass rush skills and opportunity to thrive in the Irish defense, it won’t be lip service. He’s an elite athlete that’s got true difference making speed.



Durham Smythe, TE: 6-6, 235 lbs.

Smythe is a guy that’s come onto Notre Dame’s radar late, with the Irish thought to be closed at the position once Mike Heuerman committed to the 2013 class. But Smythe’s de-commitment from Texas and reopening of his recruitment gave the Irish another opportunity to reconsider, and he’s built a ton of fans inside the program.

A quick look at Smythe’s offers gives you an idea of the type of prospect that he is. Michigan, Stanford, Florida, Georgia, Miami, Nebraska, Oregon, and Texas join a flock of others. Smythe may not be ranked in the final Rivals250, but he’s got elite recruiting cohorts, and that certainly says something.

Many think this is down to Stanford, Michigan and the Irish, but reading the tea leaves, Notre Dame could be in very good shape. The admissions process still isn’t finished at Stanford, and Michigan’s recruiting class already features two tight ends. Smythe has to see the Irish’s recent success with tight ends, and a favorable depth chart as reasons to give Notre Dame a very close look this weekend.



Eddie Vanderdoes, DL: 6-3, 310 lbs.

There’s no bigger target left on Notre Dame’s radar than Vanderdoes. He’s an elite talent, a consensus top 25 players in the country, a five-star prospect, and the heir apparent to Louis Nix if he decides to come to South Bend. With the size to play inside and the speed to play outside, Vanderdoes’ versatility makes him a key weapon to any defensive front at the college level.

Vanderdoes visited USC again last weekend, spending time with Trojan players and commits as they tried desperately to get him back into the fold. Even athletic director Pat Haden was seen putting in work with the prized lineman, and the Trojans offered Vanderdoes’ 13-year old sister a basketball scholarship, hoping that’d help keep him in California (that move was also reportedly done by Alabama).

Vanderdoes will be visiting campus with both his parents, a key towards securing the commitment of one of the nation’s top players. But there’s still road to cover, with Vanderdoes tripping down to see Nick Saban next weekend as well. The Irish will put their best foot forward this weekend, with none other than Louis Nix hosting the recruit this weekend.



Only focus after Clemson loss is winning on Saturday

SOUTH BEND, IN - SEPTEMBER 19: Head coach Brian Kelly of the Notre Dame Fighting Irish looks on against the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets in the second quarter at Notre Dame Stadium on September 19, 2015 in South Bend, Indiana. Notre Dame defeated Georgia Tech 30-22. (Photo by Joe Robbins/Getty Images)

The 2015 college football season has yet to showcase a truly great football team. With early title contenders like Ohio State and Michigan State looking less than stellar, Alabama losing a game already and the Pac-12 beating itself up, the chance that a one-loss Notre Dame team could still make it into the College Football Playoff is certainly a possibility.

But don’t expect Brian Kelly and his football team to start worrying about that now.

We saw a similar situation unfold last season, after the Irish lost a heartbreaker in the final seconds against Florida State. With many fans worried that Notre Dame wasn’t given credit for their performance in Tallahassee, the Irish’s playoff resume mattered very little as the team fell apart down the stretch.

As Notre Dame looks forward, their focus only extends to Saturday. That’s when Navy will test the Irish with their triple-option attack and better-than-usual defense, a team that Brian Kelly voted into his Top 25 this week.

Can this team make it to the Playoff? Kelly isn’t sure. But he knows what his team has to do.

“I don’t know,” Kelly said when asked about a one-loss entrance. “But we do know what we can control, and that is winning each week. So what we really talked about is we have no margin for error, and we have to pay attention to every detail.

“Each game is the biggest and most important game we play and really focusing on that. It isn’t concern yourself with big picture. You really have to focus on one week at a time.”

Kelly spread that message to his five captains after the game on Saturday night. He’s optimistic that message has set in over the weekend, and he’ll see how the team practices as they begin their on-field preparations for Navy this afternoon.

But when asked what type of response he wants to see from his team this week, it wasn’t about the minutiae of the week or a company line about daily improvement.

“The response is to win. That’s the response that we’re looking for,” Kelly said, before detailing four major factors to victory. “To win football games, you have to start fast, which we did not. There has to be an attention to detail, which certainly we were missing that at times. We got great effort, and we finished strong. So we were missing two of the four real key components that I’ll be looking for for this weekend. As long as we have those four key components, I’ll take a win by one. That would be fine with me. We need those four key components. That’s what I’ll be looking for.”

Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.