Kelly tunnel

Kelly puts 2012 in perspective


There’s no way to get around the fact that in Notre Dame’s date with destiny, they were beaten soundly by Alabama. You can talk about missed tackles, shaky referees, and an offense that was just slightly off, but the reality of the Crimson Tide’s 28-point victory points to a significant gap between the nation’s best team and the Irish.

Still, that doesn’t take away the incredible accomplishment. In a season that will go down as one of the most magical and enjoyable rides of most (young) Irish fans’ lifetimes, Brian Kelly’s squad defied the odds — running the table on a regular season schedule that looked beyond daunting, and doing it with an offense breaking in a new quarterback and a defense that came out of nowhere to become dominant.

While the focus has shifted away from what’s been done to what’s to come, Brian Kelly took some time to reflect on the season that was, and you could tell there’s some genuine — and well deserved — pride for the work done last season.

“I wanted to take the opportunity to put together the final thoughts on the 2012 season,” Kelly said, opening his comments to yesterday’s conference call. “Certainly extremely proud of our entire football team for the accomplishments. Undefeated regular season. Coming into the season, the schedule looked daunting at the least. Our guys and our staff tackled it week-in and week-out. Great leadership from our senior class and it showed itself.”

That leadership was shown not just by captains Manti Te’o, Kapron Lewis-Moore, Zack Martin and Tyler Eifert, but by a strong core surrounding them. Guys like Braxston Cave, a team leader in the locker room, and a local player whose family has had a presence each week by having the entire offensive line to their house for meals. (It’s no small task feeding almost a dozen 300-pound college guys.)

Zeke Motta was another senior leader that had a tremendous senior season, and his contributions kept the Irish defense solidified when it appeared that the secondary would be the team’s weak link. Motta coached up two cornerbacks starting their first games and a safety position that lost Jamoris Slaughter early and forced Matthias Farley, a redshirt freshman who was another converted wideout, into the fray.

With contributions from veterans like Theo Riddick, the senior class, a group that had drastically underachieved in the three seasons since they came to South Bend, left the program on a 20-year high. To look at what this group overcame is staggering. This group suffered humiliating defeats to Navy and UConn in 2009. Lost again to the Midshipmen and then Tulsa in back-to-back weeks in 2010. And after starting the 2011 season with a knockout one-two punch of USF and Michigan, it’s a credit to this group for simply getting up off the canvas.  That they were able to bury three years of losing, and block out the countless distractions and noise that existed this offseason says so much about this group.

While they ultimately fell short in the season’s final game, Kelly talked about the journey his team has taken in his tenure at Notre Dame.

“In three short years, when I stood before our team my first year we did not have one player on our roster that had beaten a Top 25 team,” Kelly said. “Three years later we’re playing in the national championship game with 15 plus starters coming back.”

And that’s the message for this offseason. While we’ll focus on the loss of stars like Te’o and Eifert, and wonder who will pick up the slack with both Riddick and Cierre Wood gone from the backfield, the bar has only been raised.

“We know what it looks like now relative to the national championship game and our workouts now will be in the off-season focused on getting back to that game,” Kelly said. “We have some work to do, there’s no question, but we know where we want to go. We know we’re capable of getting back to the national championship game and we started that journey two weeks ago.”

Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.



Navy, Notre Dame will display mutual respect with uniforms

Keenan Reynolds, Isaac Rochell

The storied and important history of Notre Dame and Navy’s long-running rivalry will be on display this weekend, with the undefeated Midshipmen coming to South Bend this weekend.

On NBCSN, a half-hour documentary presentation will take a closer look, with “Onward Notre Dame: Mutual Respect” talking about everything from Notre Dame’s 43-year winning streak, to Navy’s revival, triggered by their victory in 2007. The episode will also talk about the rivalries ties to World War II, and how the Navy helped keep Notre Dame alive during wartime.

You can catch it on tonight at 6:30 p.m. ET on NBCSN or online in the same viewing window.

On the field, perhaps an even more unique gesture of respect is planned. With Under Armour the apparel partner for both Notre Dame and Navy, both teams will take the field wearing the same cleats, gloves and baselayers. Each team’s coaching staff will also be outfitted in the same sideline gear.

More from Monday’s press release:

For the first time in college football, two opponents take the field with the exact same Under Armour baselayer, gloves and cleats to pay homage to the storied history and brotherhood between their two schools. The baselayer features both Universities’ alma maters on the sleeves and glove palms with the words “respect, honor, tradition” as a reminder of their connection to each other. Both sidelines and coaches also will wear the same sideline gear as a sign of mutual admiration.​

Navy and Notre Dame will meet for the 89th time on Saturday, a rivalry that dates back to 1927. After the Midshipmen won three of four games starting in 2007, Notre Dame hopes to extend their current winning streak to five games on Saturday.

Here’s an early look at some of the gear: