Davaris Daniels

Restocking: Wide Receivers


The departure of Michael Floyd ended a golden era for wide receivers in Notre Dame football history. When the former Irish star left campus, he left a void on the roster that ended a pretty impressive run by Notre Dame wideouts.

Since Charlie Weis took over the Irish program, wide receiver stats have exploded, with a Notre Dame wide out going for 1,000 yards in every season but 2007. Before Floyd, there was Golden Tate. Before him, there was Rhema McKnight, Jeff Samardizja and Maurice Stovall, each putting up seasons that had them rocketing up the history books.

But Floyd’s departure wasn’t only painful because of the lost production, it also exposed a roster deficiency left behind by the Weis era — a sheer lack of numbers at a position that would be crucially important in an offense that was expected to keep a base of three wide receivers on the field. While Kelly and his offensive staff supplemented that with versatile tight ends like Kyle Rudolph and Tyler Eifert, the edict was clear: go find some athletes that could bring a new era of playmakers to South Bend.

Let’s check out the work in progress, and take a look at how the Irish got here:

Michael Floyd — In his four seasons, he rewrote the Irish record books at the position.
John Goodman — Played sparingly, finishing his eligibility as a part-time contributor in 2013.
Deion Walker — Spent four years as a reserve before finishing his eligibility at UMass.

Theo Riddick — Recruited as an RB, Riddick spent two seasons in the slot before heading back.
Shaquelle Evans — The highly touted recruit transferred to UCLA shortly after Brian Kelly arrived.
Roby Toma — Looking to be a thrown-in with Manti Te’o, Toma performed capably in his four years.

Austin Collinsworth — Spent his first season as a WR before transitioning to the secondary.
Bennett Jackson — Recruited as a WR, Jackson transitioned to CB and started there in 2012.
TJ Jones — An immediate contributor at the slot, Jones shifted outside. A key contributor.
Daniel Smith — Local product has yet to make a meaningful impact on the depth chart.
Luke Massa – Signed as a quarterback, Massa shifted to WR, but sat out 2012 after ACL injury.

George Atkinson — Many expected GA3 to play WR, but he started and has stayed at running back.
Matthias Farley — Spent his redshirt season at wideout before switching, and playing, safety.
Davaris Daniels — Spent 2011 redshirting before an impressive debut season in 2012.

Chris Brown — Played as freshman, added vertical speed threat to offense.
Justin Ferguson — Sat out 2012. At 6-foot-2, 196-pounds, has size for outside receiver.
Davonte Neal — Spent 2012 as the team’s primary punt returner while seeing limited action.

Way too early spring projection

It’s a huge year for the development of Davaris Daniels. Playing his first season after redshirting, Daniels flashed the type of potential in 2012 that projects him to be a No. 1 wide receiver, though he was plagued by injures. This spring is the time for him to state his case for being a leading man. While TJ Jones may never be that, he is a great supporting piece. His versatility and ability to fight for tough yards while also catching everything thrown his way, was one of the great surprises of last season. It’s also a big spring for Chris Brown, who needs to show he can do more than just take the top off a defense once or twice.

While the staff continues to say good things about Daniel Smith, he’s got work to do if he’s going to hold off the youth on this roster. Same goes for Luke Massa, who looked good last spring before hurting his knee. Guys like Justin Ferguson will be eager to get their shot and early enrollees James Onwualu and Corey Robinson will be fighting for time as well on the outside before Will Fuller and Torii Hunter join this summer.

What happens in the slot should be interesting. Some would argue last season was wasted for Davonte Neal, who failed to crack the receiver rotation but spent the season as the primary punt retuner. Who else plays inside will be interesting. Does Jones shift back? Does Amir Carlisle spend time there? Can a youngster make some noise early? There’s production to be had at the Z receiver, and it hasn’t happened in the first three seasons of the Kelly era. Without a returning All-American to prop up the passing game, this could be our first look at the future.

Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.



Navy, Notre Dame will display mutual respect with uniforms

Keenan Reynolds, Isaac Rochell

The storied and important history of Notre Dame and Navy’s long-running rivalry will be on display this weekend, with the undefeated Midshipmen coming to South Bend this weekend.

On NBCSN, a half-hour documentary presentation will take a closer look, with “Onward Notre Dame: Mutual Respect” talking about everything from Notre Dame’s 43-year winning streak, to Navy’s revival, triggered by their victory in 2007. The episode will also talk about the rivalries ties to World War II, and how the Navy helped keep Notre Dame alive during wartime.

You can catch it on tonight at 6:30 p.m. ET on NBCSN or online in the same viewing window.

On the field, perhaps an even more unique gesture of respect is planned. With Under Armour the apparel partner for both Notre Dame and Navy, both teams will take the field wearing the same cleats, gloves and baselayers. Each team’s coaching staff will also be outfitted in the same sideline gear.

More from Monday’s press release:

For the first time in college football, two opponents take the field with the exact same Under Armour baselayer, gloves and cleats to pay homage to the storied history and brotherhood between their two schools. The baselayer features both Universities’ alma maters on the sleeves and glove palms with the words “respect, honor, tradition” as a reminder of their connection to each other. Both sidelines and coaches also will wear the same sideline gear as a sign of mutual admiration.​

Navy and Notre Dame will meet for the 89th time on Saturday, a rivalry that dates back to 1927. After the Midshipmen won three of four games starting in 2007, Notre Dame hopes to extend their current winning streak to five games on Saturday.

Here’s an early look at some of the gear: