Blake Barnett

Barnett’s visit to Oregon heats up recruiting (UPDATED)


Notre Dame accepted the commitment of quarterback Blake Barnett in late November, with the California quarterback defying the snowy South Bend weather by pledging his allegiance to the Irish. But as Barnett’s star has risen throughout the process, it looks like the competition for his signature has grown as well.

News broke Tuesday that Barnett took an unofficial visit to Oregon, to see a Ducks football program that had been one of Barnett’s childhood favorites. Oregon-based 247Sports’ recruiting writer Justin Hopkins was the man to break the story, catching up with Barnett and sounding alarm bells across ND Nation with a report that had Barnett close to flipping his commitment to Oregon.

The guys at Rivals had a bit of a different take, with recruiting analyst Adam Gorney catching Barnett as he returned to California. Gorney reported that Barnett hasn’t de-committed, though he did say that the switch was possible (as it is for every recruit that hasn’t signed on the dotted line. (And in the case of Eddie Vanderdoes, after he’s signed on the dotted line.)) But while the initial report made it feel like the switch was a foregone conclusion, Irish fans could put the paper bag down and take a few steadying deep breaths.

“I just wanted to give myself an opportunity to check out another school that I’ve been interested in for a while now and make sure I made the right decision with Notre Dame and just in fairness to the recruiting process explore my options and check it out,” Barnett told Rivals.

What’s real? What’s not? Is Barnett gone? At this point who knows.

While Hopkins has taken heat online for his reporting, there’s no doubt that he’s got close ties into the Oregon program. (There’s also no doubt that a guy writing for will have a certain spin that’s different than those covering this recruitment from the ND side.)

But if the Irish are close to losing out on Barnett, they’ll have to start over recruiting a position that looked filled perfectly with Barnett. Losing out on an elite runner and passer would hurt, though it’s not as if the Irish aren’t properly set up for the near future with Everett Golson, Malik Zaire and DeShone Kizer.

Position coach Matt LaFleur, Irish offensive coordinator and Southern California recruiting ace Mike Denbrock and Brian Kelly all will likely work hard to keep Barnett in the fold, as the quarterback was recruiting for the Irish as recently as last weekend, according to prospects that worked out at the Ohio NFTC camp.

One datapoint that’ll be worth watching is Barnett’s next return to South Bend. He’s expected to be at the Irish Invasion camp later this month, a critical visit for the Irish coaching staff to reestablish some momentum in Barnett’s recruitment and remind him why he made the decision to pick Notre Dame in the first place. If he doesn’t show up? It’s likely time to start casting a few lines into the water.

Oregon getting a visit from Barnett now might be the best thing to happen to the Irish in the long run. If it’s enough to flip his commitment for good, Notre Dame will have a chance to remedy that by finding another quarterback in this class and get them to campus this summer. The Irish staff landed Everett Golson late in the cycle after he had been committed to Butch Davis and North Carolina. They landed Gunner Kiel hours before reporting early.

Finding another quarterback to join the 2014 recruiting class won’t be difficult, especially if the Irish score points like many expect them to do. And while Oregon has quarterback Marcus Mariota, a quarterback some expect to be among the top picks in the 2015 NFL draft,  Mark Helfrich is in just his second year of life after Chip Kelly, so expect the trajectory of each program to play a role in the decision as well.

But Barnett’s visit certainly shook up the recruiting world for Notre Dame, adding another bit of intrigue to a process that still has eight months until Signing Day.

UPDATE (Wednesday, 9:00 p.m. ET): Blake Barnett has released the following statement via Twitter:

Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.



Navy, Notre Dame will display mutual respect with uniforms

Keenan Reynolds, Isaac Rochell

The storied and important history of Notre Dame and Navy’s long-running rivalry will be on display this weekend, with the undefeated Midshipmen coming to South Bend this weekend.

On NBCSN, a half-hour documentary presentation will take a closer look, with “Onward Notre Dame: Mutual Respect” talking about everything from Notre Dame’s 43-year winning streak, to Navy’s revival, triggered by their victory in 2007. The episode will also talk about the rivalries ties to World War II, and how the Navy helped keep Notre Dame alive during wartime.

You can catch it on tonight at 6:30 p.m. ET on NBCSN or online in the same viewing window.

On the field, perhaps an even more unique gesture of respect is planned. With Under Armour the apparel partner for both Notre Dame and Navy, both teams will take the field wearing the same cleats, gloves and baselayers. Each team’s coaching staff will also be outfitted in the same sideline gear.

More from Monday’s press release:

For the first time in college football, two opponents take the field with the exact same Under Armour baselayer, gloves and cleats to pay homage to the storied history and brotherhood between their two schools. The baselayer features both Universities’ alma maters on the sleeves and glove palms with the words “respect, honor, tradition” as a reminder of their connection to each other. Both sidelines and coaches also will wear the same sideline gear as a sign of mutual admiration.​

Navy and Notre Dame will meet for the 89th time on Saturday, a rivalry that dates back to 1927. After the Midshipmen won three of four games starting in 2007, Notre Dame hopes to extend their current winning streak to five games on Saturday.

Here’s an early look at some of the gear: