Property of

Irish A-to-Z: Conor Hanratty


When Notre Dame offered legacy lineman Conor Hanratty, many raised an eyebrow. With sons of former stars like Tregg Duerson and Jake Golic doing little with the full ride many perceived as a nod to their famous predecessors, Hanratty had the profile of a player whose best attribute was his father, former Irish quarterback Terry Hanratty.

But after working his way up the depth chart, the Connecticut native showed that he earned his way onto the Irish roster. And in 2013, Hanratty played a valuable role as a reserve on an Irish offensive line battered with injuries.

Entering 2014 as a key backup at guard, Hanratty looks like another valuable contributor on Harry Hiestand’s offensive line. That’s all you can ask for from an offensive line competing for a job with this loaded depth chart.


6’4.5″ 309 lbs.
Senior, No. 65



Hanratty was a three-star prospect who didn’t make it on the national radar playing in New Canaan, Connecticut. But he had some interesting offers, including opportunities to play at Boston College, Cal, Clemson, Florida State, Iowa and Stanford before closing his recruitment early by picking Notre Dame in April.

Those are the type of offers that go to a big-time prospect, not a guy with just a big-time father. On Signing Day in 2011, Kelly talked about some of the traits that he and his staff saw when offering Hanratty, things we’ve seen in his limited action so far.

“What we liked about Conor was somebody that we believed over a period of time as we developed him he was going to be a really good football player for us. We liked his tenacity. He really got after people,” Kelly said.  “He’s going to have to get stronger, going to have continue to work hard. Those are the things that we think we can teach him. He’s got some of those unique, innate abilities.”



Freshman Season (2011): Did not see action.

Sophomore Season (2012): Played in six games as a reserve offensive lineman, seeing action on special teams as well as in a backup role. Played against Navy, Michigan, Boston College, Wake Forest, USC and Alabama.

Junior Season (2013): Played in the final six games, making four starters at right guard in place of an injured Christian Lombard at right guard twice and then in place of Chris Watt against Navy and in the Pinstripe Bowl against Rutgers.



For as much as we rave about the ability of rising sophomore Steve Elmer, Hanratty took multiple starts from him once Lombard went down. And with both Lombard and Chris Watt injured late in the year, Hanratty and Elmer saw the field together, a telling sign that Hanratty had worked his way into the long-term plans of Harry Hiestand and Kelly.

Hanratty doesn’t appear to be the type of player that was readymade for college football. But plenty of programs develop their front line, and it was interesting that Wisconsin was one of his offers, as they routinely take players and spend a few years getting them ready with training table and weight room time.

Far from the most physically impressive lineman on the roster, Hanratty still has traits that work at either guard position, where he’ll likely spend this season as the primary backup. And if Mike Golic was able to spend time in an NFL training camp, Hanratty is certainly capable of that, giving him the leg up in a crowded depth chart to start once Lombard departs after this season.



In all likelihood, Hanratty is the next man in at guard for the Irish in 2014. But he’s also probably the sixth lineman, with Steve Elmer the first to kick outside to tackle if someone goes down there as well. So that puts Hanratty in a valuable position, the No. 1 replacement for Lombard and Elmer, while also getting onto the field if anything happens to Ronnie Stanley or Mike McGlinchey.

With depth like this, it’s worth seeing how Kelly and Hiestand split snaps. Do they make sure 2013 contributors like Hanratty and Matt Hegarty stay in rhythm, taking regular snaps and subbing in? That’s harder to do at center than guard, especially with Nick Martin locked in and healthy.

Hanratty is likely what life will look like going forward at Notre Dame. With the Irish recruiting up front among the best in the nation, it should routinely take two or three years to make it to the starting lineup. That makes for a longer development cycle and wait for players, but will serve the team better in the long run.



The Irish A-to-Z
Josh Atkinson
Nicky Baratti
Alex Bars
Hunter Bivin
Grant Blankenship
Jonathan Bonner
Justin Brent
Kyle Brindza
Chris Brown
Jalen Brown
Greg Bryant
Devin Butler
Jimmy Byrne
Daniel Cage
Amir Carlisle
Austin Collinsworth
Ben Councell
Scott Daly
Sheldon Day
Michael Deeb
Steve Elmer
Matthias Farley
Tarean Folston
Everett Golson
Jarrett Grace

Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.



Navy, Notre Dame will display mutual respect with uniforms

Keenan Reynolds, Isaac Rochell

The storied and important history of Notre Dame and Navy’s long-running rivalry will be on display this weekend, with the undefeated Midshipmen coming to South Bend this weekend.

On NBCSN, a half-hour documentary presentation will take a closer look, with “Onward Notre Dame: Mutual Respect” talking about everything from Notre Dame’s 43-year winning streak, to Navy’s revival, triggered by their victory in 2007. The episode will also talk about the rivalries ties to World War II, and how the Navy helped keep Notre Dame alive during wartime.

You can catch it on tonight at 6:30 p.m. ET on NBCSN or online in the same viewing window.

On the field, perhaps an even more unique gesture of respect is planned. With Under Armour the apparel partner for both Notre Dame and Navy, both teams will take the field wearing the same cleats, gloves and baselayers. Each team’s coaching staff will also be outfitted in the same sideline gear.

More from Monday’s press release:

For the first time in college football, two opponents take the field with the exact same Under Armour baselayer, gloves and cleats to pay homage to the storied history and brotherhood between their two schools. The baselayer features both Universities’ alma maters on the sleeves and glove palms with the words “respect, honor, tradition” as a reminder of their connection to each other. Both sidelines and coaches also will wear the same sideline gear as a sign of mutual admiration.​

Navy and Notre Dame will meet for the 89th time on Saturday, a rivalry that dates back to 1927. After the Midshipmen won three of four games starting in 2007, Notre Dame hopes to extend their current winning streak to five games on Saturday.

Here’s an early look at some of the gear: