Tyler Boyd, Jaylon Smith

Counting down the Irish: The Top Five


Our annual exercise is over and the result is a Top Five that was as close to consensus as possible. On a roster with unproven talent and unprecedented depth, part of what makes this list interesting and fun is that I put zero qualifications on the logic used to rank players. Beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder.

But this Top Five has something for everyone. Veteran experience. Young, rising stars. And probably the best part: Every player has a year of eligibility remaining.

If you’re looking for a promising sign, consider that of the top dozen players on this list, only Ben Koyack is out of eligibility after this season. Of course, that’s not to say that everyone is returning to school, but it puts to a very bright future just ahead for Notre Dame.



25. Will Fuller (WR, Soph.)
24. Joe Schmidt (LB, Sr.)
23. Chris Brown (WR, Jr.)
22. Jarrett Grace (LB, Sr.)
21. Malik Zaire (QB, Soph.)
20. Ishaq Williams (DE, Sr.)
19. Cole Luke (CB, Soph.)
18. Cam McDaniel (RB, Sr.)
17. Jarron Jones (DT, Jr.)
16. Corey Robinson (WR, Soph.)
15. Christian Lombard (RG, GS)
14. Cody Riggs (DB, GS)
13. Kyle Brindza (K/P, Sr.)
12. Max Redfield (S, Soph.)
11. Steve Elmer, (OL, Soph.)
10. Ben Koyack (TE, Sr.)
9. Greg Bryant (RB, Soph.)
8. Nick Martin (C, Sr.)
7. DaVaris Daniels (WR, Sr.)
6. Ronnie Stanley (OT, Jr.)


5. Tarean Folston (RB, Soph.): The future is bright at running back, and it looks like the panel sees potential greatness from both Folston and Greg Bryant. A quick run through our voters, and Folston ranks higher on all but two ballots — likely a product of a freshman season that saw Folston emerge as the team’s best runner by season’s end.

As prep stars, Bryant was the five-star prospect. But Folston was coveted by the Irish staff, who held off a late push by Auburn to ink Folston, a little later on Signing Day than anyone wanted.

Folston showed an ability to break long runs during his freshman season — a 36-yarder against Oklahoma opened things up, and a 43-yard scamper against a tough BYU defense showed that skill. But most impressive was his productivity, an ability to make something out of nothing and show a terrific blend of toughness and quickness. source: AP

The return to the spread offense should showcase Folston’s abilities to catch the ball out of the backfield and make plays in space. Very quietly, Folston had five grabs in the first half of the Blue-Gold game.

How productive he is in 2014 will also likely be determined by how the staff trusts the most at a three-headed position. But right now, the young back is taking the most reps with the No. 1 offense and he and Bryant have the ability to do some special things in South Bend before it’s all finished.

Highest Ranking: 1st. Lowest Ranking: 12th.


4. Everett Golson (QB, Sr.): That Golson ranks fourth on this roster feels either much too high or far too low.

But that’s what happens after reading thousands of words on the missing face of Notre Dame football. After a season away and months of speculation as to the type of quarterback that returns to campus, Golson’s placement is a mixture of past performance and future expectations.

At his best, Golson is the dynamic quarterback that’s a perfect fit for Brian Kelly’s offense. His ability to make plays with his feet, have the arm strength to complete any throw in the playbook, and show the special intangible to improvise when the play break down gives Kelly his best quarterbacking option in his five seasons in South Bend.

Now it’s up to Golson to live up to the expectations. The prodigal son returning to Notre Dame is a storyline that’s already keyed up on laptops around the country. No pressure, kid.

Highest Ranking: 1st. Lowest Ranking: 7th.


3. Sheldon Day (DT, Jr.): If there’s a candidate that’s got an opportunity to surprise people nationally it’s Sheldon Day. On paper, Day’s modest production the last two seasons isn’t enough to warrant placement in the Top 5. But it’s pretty clear this panel knows the promise Day’s shown, and after a sophomore season hampered by an early season ankle injury, Day’s ready to make an impact in 2014.

Sheldon Day

Sliding inside in Brian VanGorder’s system is a key predictor. No longer needing to hold up at the point of attack, Day’s free to wreak havoc on the inside, defeating a block and owning a gap, while using his elite quickness and strength to making more plays behind the line of scrimmage.

A quiet leader, Day’s taken strides this summer to lead a young defensive line that’s counting on him to pace the group. On a defense with very few givens, that the three top players on this list are all defenders certainly is promising.

Highest Ranking: 3rd. Lowest Ranking: 5th.


2. KeiVarae Russell (CB, Jr.): After coming on strong at the end of last season, Russell is expected to be a lockdown corner in a system that demands one. That we’ve all bought into his ability to be that player — and the coaching staff seems to agree — bodes well for a coverage scheme that’s seen the cornerbacks play more man coverage in one week of preseason training camp than they have in the past four seasons.

Of course, it’s hard to forget the game against Michigan, a tough outing for Russell against Michigan’s Jeremy Gallon. Considering the murder’s row of receivers that Russell has on the upcoming slate, if Russell holds up and plays to his reputation, Notre Dame has an All-American cornerback on its hands for the first time since Shane Walton. source: AP

Highest Ranking: 2nd. Lowest Ranking: 6th.


1. Jaylon Smith (LB, Soph.): It didn’t take long for Smith to ascend to a spot that was almost predestined from the moment he signed his letter of intent. After an impressive freshman campaign that was even better than his stat sheet indicated, Smith has an opportunity to see his production explode from the Will linebacker spot.

As a cover man, Smith has the ability to erase running backs and tight ends, capable of mauling a slot receiver as well. I had considered him the team’s best cover corner last season,  but Smith’s capability to cover and chase down anybody gives VanGorder a Ferrari in the garage.

It’s hard to call it a question mark, but sliding Smith inside is a change that puts more pressure on the young linebacker. Forced to battle through some traffic and make plays inside out, an opponent won’t be able to run away from Smith, but Smith will need to see the game from a new perspective, an edge player his whole life.

Smith was the top vote on seven ballots, giving away a first place spot to Folston and Golson. He’ll likely stay in this slot as long as he’s playing football in South Bend.

Highest Ranking: 1st. Lowest Ranking: 3rd.



The selection committee for the 2014 ND Top 25:

Pete Sampson, Irish Illustrated (@NDatRivals)
Tyler James, South Bend Tribune (@TJamesNDI)
Chris Hine, Chicago Tribune (@ChristopherHine)
Team OFD, One Foot Down (@OneFootDown)
Ryan Ritter, Her Loyal Sons (@HLS_NDTex)
JJ Stankevitz, CSN Chicago (@JJStankevitz)
John Walters, Medium Happy (@JDubs88)
John Vannie, ND Nation
Keith Arnold, NBC Sports (@KeithArnold)

Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.



Navy, Notre Dame will display mutual respect with uniforms

Keenan Reynolds, Isaac Rochell

The storied and important history of Notre Dame and Navy’s long-running rivalry will be on display this weekend, with the undefeated Midshipmen coming to South Bend this weekend.

On NBCSN, a half-hour documentary presentation will take a closer look, with “Onward Notre Dame: Mutual Respect” talking about everything from Notre Dame’s 43-year winning streak, to Navy’s revival, triggered by their victory in 2007. The episode will also talk about the rivalries ties to World War II, and how the Navy helped keep Notre Dame alive during wartime.

You can catch it on tonight at 6:30 p.m. ET on NBCSN or online in the same viewing window.

On the field, perhaps an even more unique gesture of respect is planned. With Under Armour the apparel partner for both Notre Dame and Navy, both teams will take the field wearing the same cleats, gloves and baselayers. Each team’s coaching staff will also be outfitted in the same sideline gear.

More from Monday’s press release:

For the first time in college football, two opponents take the field with the exact same Under Armour baselayer, gloves and cleats to pay homage to the storied history and brotherhood between their two schools. The baselayer features both Universities’ alma maters on the sleeves and glove palms with the words “respect, honor, tradition” as a reminder of their connection to each other. Both sidelines and coaches also will wear the same sideline gear as a sign of mutual admiration.​

Navy and Notre Dame will meet for the 89th time on Saturday, a rivalry that dates back to 1927. After the Midshipmen won three of four games starting in 2007, Notre Dame hopes to extend their current winning streak to five games on Saturday.

Here’s an early look at some of the gear: