Meet Kathryn Tappen: NDonNBC’s new sideline reporter


For those of you tuning in on Saturday afternoon — game time is set for at 3:30 p.m. ET on NBC — you’ll meet the newest member of Notre Dame’s broadcast team.

Kathryn Tappen joins Dan Hicks and Mike Mayock from the sidelines this season, joining the NBC Sports team from the NHL Network, where she served as the network’s lead studio host.

A former Academic All-American athlete at Rutgers, Tappen isn’t completely new to the network. She worked with NBC in Sochi at the 2014 Olympics, hosting men’s and women’s hockey. Before that, she spent five years at NESN, covering the Patriots, Celtics, Red Sox and Bruins.

Tappen will be busy in her new job. In addition to Notre Dame, she’ll contribute to the Sunday Night Football broadcast, work the Super Bowl and join the studio team for NHL Live and NHL Overtime.

Busy prepping for her debut on the sidelines for Notre Dame, Tappen was nice enough to catch up with me before the season begins.


What drew you to the opportunity to work Notre Dame football Saturdays?

The conversations between NBC started right around the Olympics, and it was a lot of hockey talk and discussions about how the role would fit with me at NBC. The opportunity to do Notre Dame sidelines was eventually presented, and I was excited at the thought to be a part of such a historic football program on the network that’s been broadcasting Irish football for 25 years.

The production quality, the broadcasters, Mike Mayock, Dan Hicks, Doug Flutie, the pregame crew, it’s a tremendous broadcast and to even be considered to be a part of it was a huge honor for me.

I love being around football. I have been soley around the NHL the past three years, but prior to that I had covered the New England Patriots and college football teams in New England, so I’m familiar with the game and I enjoy being around it.


As someone experiencing Notre Dame for the first time, what’s that been like?

The history, the tradition and the team at Notre Dame. It’s an amazing place. I was out there for the first time in early August and I just couldn’t get over, not just the campus itself, but the great people that work around that program. It’s going to be really exciting come August 30 when the season starts.


I imagine you’ve had to do your homework, too. How have you spent the weeks leading up to the season?

It’s a lot of preparation. In the past, I’ve just watched college football Saturdays as a fan, so I haven’t exactly honed in on the specifics of the Notre Dame program. Now it becomes preparing for an upcoming season in which you are no longer watching as a fan. My responsibility will now be to help educate the fan both on the Notre Dame side and their weekly opponent. where you’re covering all the home games for a Notre Dame season and then the opponents.

After the NHL season ended, I took a little bit of time away with my family and friends, and then the last couple of weeks have been all about preparation. The visit out to Notre Dame, and to Michigan, was huge, as I got to put faces to names that I’ve been reading about, and they’ve been able to see me.

I’m just trying to totally submerge myself. Not just about Notre Dame, but about the whole college football spectrum heading into the season.


This isn’t your first time jumping into something new. How does your experience with the NHL help you?

That’s what gives me confidence going into the season. As many nerves as there are getting used to a new program like Notre Dame, I can take a step back and remember where I was in 2007 when I got assigned to the Boston Bruins broadcast working for NESN. At the time, it was four days before the start of the Bruins season.
I had to totally shift gears in a short amount of time. And what I really did was lean on my analysts. I sat and I listened for an entire season and I asked a lot of questions. That’s what I did with Mike Mayock and Doug Flutie and our producers when I sat in on practice in South Bend.

Just trying to ask questions and familiarize myself. The biggest difference is that I have prior experience covering football and watched it as a kid. I understand it way better than I understood the NHL before I started with the Bruins.


What were your first impressions of Brian Kelly and the Notre Dame program?

He was tremendous. It was a very cold rainy day at Notre Dame. We were there for double sessions and on the field all day long. He was great. He cracked some jokes with me. Obviously he’s a big Boston fan, growing up there, so we were able to have a little bit of common interest there.

He was very accommodating. Everyone at Notre Dame has welcomed me with open arms. I know that I need to earn the respect of everybody in that organization, but they’ve at least given me the opportunity to do so.


Before you were a broadcaster, you were a collegiate athlete. How do you think that helps you in your current job?

I ran cross country, indoor and outdoor track and field, at Rutgers. So it was a three-season sport. I redshirted my freshman year because of a back injury, but other than that I was ready to go. I loved it. I would not trade my experience as a college athlete for anything in the world. I met so many great people, and I still have contacts in the business whom I met through my athletic program at Rutgers. My former teammates and friends from other teams at Rutgers I’m close with to this day.

Over the years of covering professional sports, it doesn’t come up a lot. Those guys are on a totally different level, some of them have worked 12-15 years in the professional ranks. A lot of the times it wasn’t really brought up that I was an athlete myself.

However now that I’m covering college again, I was actually amazed at how many times people brought it up in the couple of days that I was at Notre Dame. Just being a part of that atmosphere, being around student-athletes, it reminded me so much of when I was at school, and what our training programs were like in cross country in late August, when we had two sessions a day as well. You were always eating together, laughing together, training together and getting ready for the school year. It was great.

I started to feel a little bit like I was back at college. I was definitely able to take a step back and say wow, this was me not all that long ago. I think having that collegiate athletic experience under my belt gives me a better understanding of what’s happening off the field, not just on the field, for the players.


Special thanks to Kathryn for making time. She’ll be working the sidelines tweeting from @NDonNBC and can also be followed @KathrynTappen

Only focus after Clemson loss is winning on Saturday

SOUTH BEND, IN - SEPTEMBER 19: Head coach Brian Kelly of the Notre Dame Fighting Irish looks on against the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets in the second quarter at Notre Dame Stadium on September 19, 2015 in South Bend, Indiana. Notre Dame defeated Georgia Tech 30-22. (Photo by Joe Robbins/Getty Images)

The 2015 college football season has yet to showcase a truly great football team. With early title contenders like Ohio State and Michigan State looking less than stellar, Alabama losing a game already and the Pac-12 beating itself up, the chance that a one-loss Notre Dame team could still make it into the College Football Playoff is certainly a possibility.

But don’t expect Brian Kelly and his football team to start worrying about that now.

We saw a similar situation unfold last season, after the Irish lost a heartbreaker in the final seconds against Florida State. With many fans worried that Notre Dame wasn’t given credit for their performance in Tallahassee, the Irish’s playoff resume mattered very little as the team fell apart down the stretch.

As Notre Dame looks forward, their focus only extends to Saturday. That’s when Navy will test the Irish with their triple-option attack and better-than-usual defense, a team that Brian Kelly voted into his Top 25 this week.

Can this team make it to the Playoff? Kelly isn’t sure. But he knows what his team has to do.

“I don’t know,” Kelly said when asked about a one-loss entrance. “But we do know what we can control, and that is winning each week. So what we really talked about is we have no margin for error, and we have to pay attention to every detail.

“Each game is the biggest and most important game we play and really focusing on that. It isn’t concern yourself with big picture. You really have to focus on one week at a time.”

Kelly spread that message to his five captains after the game on Saturday night. He’s optimistic that message has set in over the weekend, and he’ll see how the team practices as they begin their on-field preparations for Navy this afternoon.

But when asked what type of response he wants to see from his team this week, it wasn’t about the minutiae of the week or a company line about daily improvement.

“The response is to win. That’s the response that we’re looking for,” Kelly said, before detailing four major factors to victory. “To win football games, you have to start fast, which we did not. There has to be an attention to detail, which certainly we were missing that at times. We got great effort, and we finished strong. So we were missing two of the four real key components that I’ll be looking for for this weekend. As long as we have those four key components, I’ll take a win by one. That would be fine with me. We need those four key components. That’s what I’ll be looking for.”

Go for two or not? Both sides of the highly-debated topic

during their game at Clemson Memorial Stadium on October 3, 2015 in Clemson, South Carolina.

Notre Dame’s two failed two-point conversion tries against Clemson have been the source of much debate in the aftermath of the Irish’s 24-22 loss to the Tigers. Brian Kelly’s decision to go for two with just over 14 minutes left in the game forced the Irish into another two-point conversion attempt with just seconds left in regulation, with DeShone Kizer falling short as he attempted to push the game into overtime.

Was Kelly’s decision to go for two the right one at the beginning of the fourth quarter? That depends.

Take away the result—a pass that flew through the fingers of a wide open Corey Robinson. Had the Irish kicked their extra point, Justin Yoon would’ve trotted onto the field with a chance to send the game into overtime. (Then again, had Robinson caught the pass, Notre Dame would’ve been kicking for the win in the final seconds…)

This is the second time a two-point conversion decision has opened Kelly up to second guessing in the past eight games. Last last season, Kelly’s decision to go for two in the fourth-quarter with an 11-point lead against Northwestern, came back to bite the Irish and helped the Wildcats stun Notre Dame in overtime.

That choice was likely fueled by struggles in the kicking game, heightened by Kyle Brindza’s blocked extra-point attempt in the first half, a kick returned by Northwestern that turned a 14-7 game into a 13-9 lead. With a fourth-quarter, 11-point lead, the Irish failed to convert their two-point attempt that would’ve stretched their lead to 13 points. After Northwestern converted their own two-point play, they made a game-tying field goal after Cam McDaniel fumbled the ball as the Irish were running out the clock. Had the Irish gone for (and converted) a PAT, the Wildcats would’ve needed to score a touchdown.

Moving back to Saturday night, Kelly’s decision needs to be put into context. After being held to just three points for the first 45 minutes of the game, C.J. Prosise broke a long catch and run for a touchdown in the opening minute of the fourth quarter. Clemson would be doing their best to kill the clock. Notre Dame’s first touchdown of the game brought the score within 12 points when Kelly decided to try and push the score within 10—likely remembering the very way Northwestern forced overtime.

After the game, Kelly said it was the right decision, citing his two-point conversion card and the time left in the game. On his Sunday afternoon teleconference, he said the same, giving a bit more rationale for his decision.

“We were down and we got the chance to put that game into a two-score with a field goal. I don’t chase the points until the fourth quarter, and our mathematical chart, which I have on the sideline with me and we have a senior adviser who concurred with me, and we said go for two. It says on our chart to go for two.

“We usually don’t use the chart until the fourth quarter because, again, we don’t chase the points. We went for two to make it a 10-point game. So we felt we had the wind with us so we would have to score a touchdown and a field goal because we felt like we probably only had three more possessions.

“The way they were running the clock, we’d probably get three possessions maximum and we’re going to have to score in two out of the three. So it was the smart decision to make, it was the right one to make. Obviously, you know, if we catch the two-point conversion, which was wide open, then we just kick the extra point and we’ve got a different outcome.”

That logic and rationale is why I had no problem with the decision when it happened in real time. But not everybody agrees.

Perhaps the strongest rebuke of the decision came from Irish Illustrated’s Tim Prister, who had this to say about the decision in his (somewhat appropriately-titled) weekly Point After column:

Hire another analyst or at least assign someone to the task of deciphering the Beautiful Mind-level math problem that seems to be vexing the Notre Dame brain-trust when a dweeb with half-inch thick glasses and a pocket protector full of pens could tell you that in the game of football, you can’t chase points before it is time… (moving ahead)

…The more astonishing thing is that no one in the ever-growing football organization that now adds analysts and advisors on a regular basis will offer the much-needed advice. Making such decisions in the heat of battle is not easy. What one thinks of in front of the TV or in a press box does not come as clearly when you’re the one pulling the trigger for millions to digest.

And yet with this ever-expanding entourage, Notre Dame still does not have anyone who can scream through the headphones to the head coach, “Coach, don’t go for two!”

If someone, anyone within the organization had the common sense and then the courage to do so, the Irish wouldn’t have lost every game in November of 2014 and would have had a chance to win in overtime against Clemson Saturday night.

My biggest gripe about the decision was the indecision that came along with the choice. Scoring on a big-play tends to stress your team as special teams players shuffle onto the field and the offense comes off. But Notre Dame’s use of a timeout was a painful one, and certainly should’ve been spared considering the replay review that gave Notre Dame’s coaching staff more time to make a decision.

For what it’s worth, Kelly’s decision was probably similar to the one many head coaches would make. And it stems from the original two-point conversion chart that Dick Vermeil developed back in the 1970s.

The original chart didn’t account for success rate or time left in the game. As Kelly mentioned before, Notre Dame uses one once it’s the fourth quarter.

It’s a debate that won’t end any time soon. And certainly one that will have hindsight on the side of the “kick the football” argument.