Five things we learned: Michigan State 36, Notre Dame 28

121 Comments

Brian Kelly’s football team isn’t ready for primetime. Not when the offense lays an egg and the special teams implodes. Not when the defense gives up plays big, small, and everywhere in between.

But the Irish have heart. And after it looked like Notre Dame was going to get run out of its own stadium in the most disappointing loss of Kelly’s tenure in South Bend, they didn’t—gallantly marching back and bringing the home crowd to life, as Michigan State’s seemingly insurmountable late third-quarter lead of 29 points was down to just one score with enough time for some late-game magic by DeShone Kizer.

But the Irish lost their second game of the season, falling to Michigan State 36-29. And while there are no prizes for good efforts, they never got closer than the ball in DeShone Kizer’s scorching hands with under four minutes to go and the Spartans’ on their heels.

But instead of rolling the dice on Kizer and the offense on 4th-and-7 at their own 32-yard line, Kelly punted with 3:37 left, putting the weight of the game on his defense. And from there, Brian VanGorder’s unit did what it has done for much of his tenure in South Bend—put themselves in a position to succeed, only to implode— a broken coverage on 3rd-and-7 icing the game for the Spartans.

The loss is a dagger for the Irish. With their playoff goals officially dashed, it’s back to the drawing board for Kelly and his young team.

Here’s what we learned:

Notre Dame’s touted offensive line got handled by Michigan State’s front seven. 

Before the Irish offense went up-tempo and vertical against the Spartans, they tried to go toe-to-toe in the trenches. And it didn’t work.

Notre Dame’s running game was nonexistent on Saturday night, the Irish picking up just 57 yards on 25 official attempts. A week after Josh Adams looked like he was on the ascent, the Spartans had him stuck in neutral, just 29 yards on 12 carries.

The Irish offensive line, a group that some thought was the best in the nation heading into the season, had its lunch handed to them by Malik McDowell and the Spartans front seven. Kizer was harassed early and often, the pocket collapsing and several blitz pickups missed.

Three games in, Notre Dame’s offensive front is still searching for its identity. And after struggling in an unfriendly environment against Texas, they were exposed on their home field on Saturday night.

Another good opponent, another big score against Notre Dame’s defense. 

With 36 points allowed to Michigan State, the Irish defense let another quality opponent put up a big number on them. Add in Texas’ 37 in regulation, Ohio State’s 44, Stanford’s 38 and Pitt’s 30, and only Nevada, Boston College and Wake Forest have failed to hit 30 since the Irish held Temple to 20 points last Halloween.

The Spartans put up 501 yards of offense. They ran for 260, averaging five-yards a touch. They owned the time of possession, holding the ball for just shy of 38 minutes. And they converted third downs, with Notre Dame failing to get off the field in the first half before breaking down completely in the third quarter.

With most doing their best to discount Texas’ success in the trenches to scheme or tempo, Michigan State spent a few plays playing with pace before settling down and slugging it out. And they won going away, the handful of nice stops made by Irish defenders erased by bad run fits or schematic breakdowns.

It’s a familiar song, but one that still haunts. Another good opponent, another big number put up against the Irish.

A young secondary needed Cole Luke to step up. Instead he might have played the worst game of his career. 

Notre Dame’s young secondary fought hard. But their leader struggled, and Cole Luke’s tough Saturday night ultimately doomed the Irish defense.

The best defensive back on the Irish roster didn’t play like it Saturday night. And after two weeks watching Nick Coleman wear a bullseye, the football seemed to find Luke, often times ending in a big Michigan State play.

The Spartans flipped the game’s momentum when Luke was beat on a long touchdown, Donnie Corley ripping the ball out of Luke’s hands, turning what looked like an interception into a touchdown. The senior missed a key open-field tackle in the red zone that turned into a touchdown for the Spartans and was a critical part of the blown coverage on 3rd-and-ballgame late in the fourth quarter.

There’s no replacing key pieces like Shaun Crawford or Max Redfield, two building blocks whose absence is certainly felt with true freshman now playing in their place. But Luke’s struggles, especially coming against a critical opponent, doomed the Irish, and now force the veteran to rebuild his confidence before the season goes sideways.

A team that needed to do the ordinary things well didn’t—and the mistakes proved costly.  

On a frustrating Saturday night where many Irish fans are throwing hand grenades and waiting for daylight to look for any real answers, Kelly probably encapsulated his team’s problems best.

“We’re sloppy as a football team. There is not a referendum on who’s got to carry who, or the defense can’t do that,” Kelly said. “We’re too sloppy overall as a football team… Two huge mistakes on special teams and the difference in the game was eight points. So we gotta clean up the whole deal. So this is everywhere, and this is on me. We gotta clean up everything. We are a sloppy football team.”

A kickoff return for touchdown overturned on a holding call. A blown punt return that one play later turned into a Michigan State touchdown. Those tend to be forgotten when the defense is giving up big plays and the head coach is deciding to punt instead of roll the dice with his quarterback.

The Irish aren’t good enough to win sloppy. And they proved it Saturday night.

Notre Dame’s not just playing for the future. This coaching staff will be coaching for their jobs, too. 

Brian Kelly isn’t going to address the status of his defensive coordinator. But in his attempts to repeatedly fall on the sword for his team’s loss, Kelly’s commentary on the blown assignment that allowed the defense to convert on third-and-long might as well have been directed straight at VanGorder.

“We’re in a position we gotta make that play, obviously. They got two verticals, pretty standard deal… and we’re not in good position,” Kelly explained. “That’s poor coaching. We’re not coaching it well enough.

“Obviously if our players can’t execute a simple two vertical corner sitting over the top and the safety coming underneath, that’s on me. That falls on my shoulders, and we’re not getting that done. So we’re either not capable of running that coverage or we’re not coaching it well enough, one or the other, so I gotta do a better job.”

Ultimately, Kelly’s the man in charge of his program. And he’s also the one who put his defense in VanGorder’s hands. And that decision hasn’t looked like a good one since VanGorder’s defense befuddled opponents early in his first season, with no game tape to prepare from.

But scheme is one thing, personnel is another. And even as the Irish reload a roster that lost more talent than any one team since the Holtz era, this staff will likely be evaluated—and retained–by its ability to teach and improve this young roster.

Because Kelly isn’t going anywhere. And while he’s yet to fire a coach in his time in South Bend, course correction isn’t something he’s afraid of.

“Those are the guys we have. We can’t trade em. They’re not getting cut. We recruited them. I told our staff, ‘Those are our guys, so we’ve got to get ’em better. We’ve got to put them in better position to make plays,'” Kelly said emphatically.

“Those are our guys that are going to be out there next week against Duke, and they’re going to have to make some tackles the following week against the next opposition. So we can cry all we want about what we didn’t do, but we gotta start doing it.”

Irish land blue-chip OL Aaron Banks

aaron-banks
Tom Loy, Irish 247
14 Comments

Notre Dame received the commitment of 4-star offensive tackle Aaron Banks on Friday afternoon. Picking the Irish over a national offer list that included Michigan, Tennessee, and local programs USC and UCLA, the 6-foot-7, 335-pound Banks reminded all that even if the Irish only won four games this season, Harry Hiestand is still one of the premier offensive line coaches in the country.

Banks made the commitment from a ceremony at his high school in El Cerrito, California. And when he picked the Irish, he added to Notre Dame’s impressive offensive line haul, joining Dillan Gibbons, Joshua Lugg and Robert Hainsey — a key piece of the puzzle moving forward.

Banks is a consensus 4-star recruit and a Top 200 prospect. He took an official visit to Michigan in November, but has been a long-time target of Hiestand’s, visiting South Bend in September and welcoming Brian Kelly and Hiestand into his home after the USC game.

As a big recruiting weekend gets started at Notre Dame, the annual Echoes Awards will serve as the beginning of an important home stretch for a program without a bowl game. As Kelly still looks to lock in a defensive coordinator, not to mention other staff changes still in the air, Banks takes back some of the lost momentum, a key commitment heading into a holiday dead period before a furious finish leading into the first Wednesday in February.

Banks is No. 18 in the Irish recruiting class. He’s an early-enrollee, ready to hit campus within weeks and compete on the interior of the offensive line during spring ball.

Zaire says thank you to Notre Dame

CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA - SEPTEMBER 12: Quarterback Malik Zaire #8 of the Notre Dame Fighting Irish rushes past defensive end Mike Moore #32 of the Virginia Cavaliers in the third quarter at Scott Stadium on September 12, 2015 in Charlottesville, Virginia. The Notre Dame Fighting Irish won, 34-27. (Photo by Patrick Smith/Getty Images)
Getty
12 Comments

Big week for The Observer. Not just for its advertising revenues, but for the classy gesture that outgoing senior quarterback Malik Zaire made this week.

Thursday’s edition included a letter to the editor from Zaire, who took to the student newspaper not to make headlines around the internet, but rather to thank the university for his experience in South Bend.

While Zaire’s time at Notre Dame is drawing to a close, he will leave as a proud alum. So while he’ll play football next season at another university, Zaire wrote the following in Thursday’s issue:

Dear Notre Dame students and staff,

My life changed for the better the moment I stepped onto the University of Notre Dame’s beautiful campus. The one goal I had set in my mind to achieve was to become a better man, a Notre Dame man. After growing through many trials and triumphs, the thing I’ve learned most from my experience was that if you don’t believe in yourself first, then no one else will. I believed in becoming a better man and succeeding through any circumstance, and I can say that I’ve truly accomplished that. I often refer to the famous quote from the movie “Catch Me If You Can” that was well put by Frank Abagnale:

“Two little mice fell in a bucket of cream. The first mouse quickly gave up and drowned. The second mouse wouldn’t quit. He struggled so hard that eventually he churned that cream into butter and crawled out.”

I’ve put my heart, soul and passion into the University, the football program, the South Bend community and the Irish community worldwide. I have the unbelievable honor to represent this University to the fullest as a student and soon-to-be alumni. Thank you to the amazing students and staff that I’ve met through the years for helping me grow into the person I’ve always wanted to be. I love the Irish and will always be an Irish alum no matter where I go! I look forward to keeping in touch. Let’s change the world!

Go Irish!

Malik Zaire

Senior
Dec. 7

Zaire is expected to compete for a starting quarterback job next year as a graduate transfer. He’s reportedly taken a visit to Wisconsin and plans to visit North Carolina as well, just two of several programs on the radar as Zaire looks to step in and win a starting Power 5 job.

 

 

 

ESPN’s Kiper & McShay: Kizer should return to Notre Dame

SOUTH BEND, IN - OCTOBER 29: DeShone Kizer #14 of the Notre Dame Fighting Irish drops back to pass during the game against the Miami Hurricanes at Notre Dame Stadium on October 29, 2016 in South Bend, Indiana.  (Photo by Michael Hickey/Getty Images)
26 Comments

It’s evaluation season. With college football’s regular season over, the focus now turns to the stay-or-go decision that faces many of college football’s best players. Return for another season? Or head to the NFL?

That’s the big question facing DeShone Kizer. Viewed as a can’t-miss prospect by some earlier in the season, Kizer now awaits feedback from the NFL’s advisory board, who’ll give him either a first-round grade, a second-round grade, or none — essentially serving as a message to return to school.

That feedback is something Kizer’s requested, with Brian Kelly revealing that Kizer is one of four underclassmen requesting a review, joined by Mike McGlinchey, Nyles Morgan and Quenton Nelson. 

And while most still think it’s merely a formality before Kizer heads to the NFL, two of the media’s most well-established pundits, ESPN’s Mel Kiper and Todd McShay, are among those who actually think Kizer should stay in school.

In ESPN’s 25 questions about the 2017 NFL Draft, Kiper and McShay focus their attention on potential first-round quarterbacks:

There’s really only one guy right now, and he might not even enter the draft. That’s North Carolina’s Mitch Trubisky, a fourth-year junior who is in his first season as the starter. Trubisky has thrown 28 touchdown passes to only four interceptions, but he’s still green — with another year of seasoning, he could be the No. 1 pick in the 2018 draft. He’s not ready to play right away in the NFL.

I don’t see any other first-rounders in the group. Notre Dame’s DeShone Kizer, a third-year sophomore, has to go back to school. Clemson’s Deshaun Watson has taken a step back this season. Underclassmen Luke Falkand Patrick Mahomes could use another year in school, and they don’t project as first-rounders.

McShay echoed Kiper’s evaluation of Kizer, stating: “Kizer needs another year.” And if the Irish get that, it means they’ll have a 1-2 depth chart of a third-year starter in Kizer and junior Brandon Wimbush, who saved a year of eligibility in 2016 and has three remaining.

Kizer’s been clear that he hasn’t made up his mind, planning on talking with his family about the decision in the weeks following the season. And with the year-end banquet this weekend with Notre Dame hosting the “Echoes,” that decision might come sooner than later.

Last year, the NFL draft wasn’t kind to the Irish roster. Four key players gave up eligibility to head to the NFL, with Ronnie Stanley going in the Top 10 to the Baltimore Ravens and Will Fuller joining him as a first-round selection after going to the Houston Texans. Even injured, Jaylon Smith was taken near the top of the second round by Dallas and C.J. Prosise was a third-round selection of the Seattle Seahawks.

Underclassmen have until January 16th to declare.

 

Swarbrick discusses the state of Irish football program

57 Comments

Jack Swarbrick spoke extensively about the state of the Notre Dame football program. Released last Friday and a part of Swarbrick’s weekly podcast, the Irish athletic director covered the laundry list of hot-button issues, including Brian Kelly’s status, the NCAA order to vacate wins that Notre Dame is appealing, and the challenge of winning football games in today’s environment.

The entire 25 minutes are worth a listen, as Swarbrick and Nolan cover just about every question and complaint that’s out there. And in case you don’t have that time, here’s a quick breakdown:

 

Swarbrick on the 2016 season. 

“It was an extremely disappointing year. Every player, every coach, myself, other administrators involved in the program, we all share the same view. There’s no way around that conclusion. It’s not bad breaks, it’s not a play here, a play there. We didn’t do what we need to do. So we do start from that perspective.

“I think there’s a danger in overreacting to any one piece of information that you get in the course of the evaluation of football programs. That begins with, it looks one way from a this-season perspective, but it feels a little different to me from a two-season perspective.”

 

Swarbrick on the evaluation process: 

“I’m looking at the program. Wins and losses are a huge indicia of where the program is, but it’s not the only one. More important to me, frankly, is the experience of our students. My interaction with them and what their interactions with the coaches, and the environment and are we meeting their expectations. Now, we clearly didn’t meet their expectations competitively this year, because they want to win, too. But on many of the other things, the program elements are in good shape.”

 

On the off-field issues, and the challenges that faced the football team this fall. 

“I don’t want to do anything to minimize the disappointments, whether they’re competitive or unacceptable behavior in the last game at USC by one of our players, obviously, which just isn’t acceptable, it isn’t okay. The disciplinary issues we had to deal with at the front of the year, none of those are acceptable, all of those go into the evaluation, but those are the only ones that sort of get the public scrutiny. I’m dealing with the other 120 young men who are for the most part like my co-host James (Onwualu), doing everything right, making every right decision, having a real positive experience. You’ve got to look at it all, not just isolated elements of it.

 

Discussing the disappointment of the NCAA’s ruling to vacate wins and why the university is appealing: 

“If you’d merely expelled the students, you wouldn’t get this penalty. But because you went though an educative process and kept them in school and adjusted credits and made those things, you subjected yourself to this penalty. That seems like a bad message to send, but that’s one that we’re continuing to advocate for down the road.”

 

On the challenges of winning in today’s college football, as opposed to 30 years ago. 

“I think undoubtedly it is harder. Now, people from that era may have a different view. But there are things that make it harder. But it doesn’t make any difference. It’s harder to win basketball games than it was back then. It’s harder to do a number of things.

“We don’t treat any of that as an excuse or a reason to have different goals. I sort of embrace that. Some of those things that you might view as obstacles are ultimately the things that we have to offer young people. It is the eliteness of the institution and the quality of the education. You can’t say it’s an obstacle and then talk about how great it is because it helps you. That’s the way it is. I wouldn’t trade anything for the circumstance we now compete in. I think it is exactly what it should be. We have to do a better job with it, that’s all.”