Tag: Stanford

David Shaw

Offseason Q&A: Stanford


Notre Dame’s season finale will once again have major implications—if all goes according to plans. The Irish will close the season in Northern California, visiting Stanford in a rivalry that’s growing quickly to become one of the more important ones on the Irish schedule.

No longer are the Cardinal the shabby outfit best remembered for a spunky marching band or a zany mascot. David Shaw has built one of college football’s most consistent programs, continuing Jim Harbaugh’s reclamation project as he’s put together a rough-and-tumble bully in a conference not exactly know for its physicality. Just as impressive, the Cardinal have also revved up their recruiting machine, another elite academic institution that’s winning its share of battles for blue-chip talent.

To get us up to speed on things at The Farm, Do-Hyoung Park joins me. A fellow St. Paul native, Do is a senior staff writer and former sports editor of The Stanford Daily where he’s covered the Cardinal football, baseball and tennis squads, while also serving as part of the football broadcast team on KZSU, Stanford’s student radio station. He’s majoring in chemical engineering.

(He also wrote this, which I’d be happy to co-sign.)

From the great state of Minnesota, Do provided some great, in-depth answers to the best questions I could think up. Hope you enjoy.


After an incredible run, Stanford finally had an average season, with the Cardinal finishing 8-5 on the year. Their losses were all respectable, but a tough schedule and just an average offense doomed David Shaw’s team. What was the attitude like on The Farm this spring? And from a psyche perspective, how did the players and coaching staff react to their most disappointing season since early in the Harbaugh era?

I definitely can’t speak for the players and coaches, but I can tell you one thing: It’s been clear to me for the last couple of years that despite all of the program’s recent success, nobody has started to take winning for granted — success is earned, not a given.

And with that in mind, I think the 8-5 season was more frustrating for the team than disappointing. They felt they were certainly going out there and playing well enough — on defense, at least — to earn their victories week in and week out (apart from the Oregon and ASU games). But game after game, seemingly one momentary lapse in execution would do the team in and turn what arguably should have been wins in their minds into losses.

Remember that Stanford actually did score the go-ahead touchdown late against USC but had it called back on a boneheaded chop block by running back Remound Wright. Remember that Stanford had Notre Dame on the ropes before cornerback Wayne Lyons pretty much forgot to cover his man on fourth-and-11.

Don’t let the record fool you — the 2014 Stanford team was worse than its predecessors, but not by much. Three games came down to one play that didn’t go Stanford’s way. If they had, we’re looking at 11-2 and probably a top-10 ranking to end the year. Isn’t football fickle?

The bottom line is that every week, the players were frustrated because they knew that they were capable of playing so much better. Nothing really changed for the Cardinal when they tore Cal, UCLA and Maryland apart to end the season — it’s that they stopped making mistakes and finally started playing to their potential.

Call it a rebuilding season, a downturn or whatever you will, but people around the Stanford program know that their record in 2014 wasn’t indicative of how good this program was (and still is), and I’m willing to bet that they’re poised to use the frustration of last year as fuel for their fire in 2015. These guys are used to playing with a huge chip on their shoulders, and that goes double for this season.


Kevin Hogan is entering his final season on The Farm. Irish fans have seen Hogan plenty, and are well aware that they were one of the quarterback’s favorite schools, but didn’t offer before Hogan committed to Stanford. Last year was an up and down season for Hogan, though he finished on a high note. How confident are Cardinal fans that Hogan is the type of quarterback who can do more than just steer the ship? The Irish had Tommy Rees, a “game manager” quarterback by most Irish fans’ appraisals. Is Hogan more than that?

Even through two Pac-12 titles and two Rose Bowl appearances, Cardinal fans have never had full confidence in Kevin Hogan. By now, they’ve resigned themselves to the fact that no, Kevin Hogan will never be more than a “game manager” in their minds. But that’s not necessarily a bad thing.

Sure, it’s incredible when a program gets a quarterback like Andrew Luck that can truly carry a program and raise the bar, but Stanford doesn’t need life-changing play at the quarterback position to be an elite team — it just needs an efficient, mistake-free player that can effectively distribute the ball. And that’s exactly what Hogan can do when he’s at his best.

It was, as you described, an up-and-down season for Hogan last year, but he was dealing with quite a bit of adversity both on and off the field in having to play behind an offensive line breaking in four starters while also dealing with the illness and eventual passing of his father during the season.

Despite that, the accuracy problems that have plagued him in the past have seemingly gotten better, and when his offensive line is getting push for his running backs to balance out the offense, Hogan can be brutally efficient in dishing the ball on a dime to his playmakers out wide. Such was the case when he was 15-of-20 for 214 yards at Cal and 16-of-19 for 234 yards at UCLA.

His biggest problem over the last few seasons was that he wouldn’t go through his progressions and lock on to his biggest weapon, Ty Montgomery, and try to force him the ball, often into heavy coverage. But with two-plus years of starting experience under his belt and a deep, talented receiving corps around him, I’m expecting his mistakes and lapses to be few and far between this year. And that’ll be enough.


Perhaps the biggest change inside the Cardinal program is the defense. Even if Lance Anderson managed to keep the train rolling after replacing Derek Mason, Stanford needs to replace NINE STARTERS from a veteran defense. How exactly will they do that? Or are you expecting a major step backwards?

The defensive situation may appear pretty dire at first glance, but I’m quite surprised that people haven’t given Stanford’s defense at least the benefit of the doubt after it finished as a top-5 unit in the country in each of the last three seasons.

It’s not like Stanford hasn’t had to rebuild on defense before. At the end of 2013, the Cardinal lost DE Josh Mauro, LB Trent Murphy, LB Shayne Skov, DE Ben Gardner and SS Ed Reynolds, who were most of the entire defensive core of that 2013 team. (Four of the above are now NFL players.) The Cardinal didn’t even skip a beat.

It’s not like Stanford hasn’t been recruiting well on defense — the Cardinal are plugging holes with four-star and five-star recruits all over their two-deep.

And finally, it’s not like Stanford is going to be playing fresh faces — because of Stanford’s robust defensive rotation, only two of the projected starters on defense haven’t seen significant game action before.

Lance Anderson (DC), Duane Akina (secondary) and Randy Hart (D-line) are some of the absolute best coaches in the business and have proven track records. I’m sure the defense will have its growing pains at the start, but I don’t think it will regress by much.


Back to the offensive side of the ball. Stanford built their offense around a strong offensive line and a solid running game. But they couldn’t seem to find a go-to running back after having great luck riding guys like Stepfan Taylor and Tyler Gaffney. Who do you expect to take charge of the position group in 2015 and will the offensive line simply reload after losing Andrus Peat?

Shaw has made no secret of the fact that rising sophomore Christian McCaffrey will be the feature piece of the Stanford offense in 2015. Stanford fans were sorely disappointed that they didn’t get to see more of him last year, and for good reason too: McCaffrey is, without question, the most electric playmaker on this team and the future leader of this offense.

Last year, he averaged a remarkable 7.1 yards per carry and 14.8 yards per reception, and regardless of where he’s playing — running back, slot receiver, wildcat back, kick/punt returner — he has the speed and change-of-direction ability to be a game-changer. On top of that, he’s added a lot of muscle this offseason, which adds a more downhill, power dimension to his game as well.

McCaffrey isn’t going to be a traditional Stanford power back in the mold of Taylor or Gaffney, and I’m expecting Shaw to expand the playbook in a way he never has before at Stanford to exploit McCaffrey’s considerable skill set. I’d still expect Remound Wright, who was great to close 2014, in short-yardage and goal-line situations, though. Unfortunately, it looks like Barry Sanders will be the odd man out. I really wish that he’d panned out.

The offensive line shouldn’t take a huge step back with the loss of Peat, as former five-star recruit Kyle Murphy, who started every game at right tackle last year, will switch over to Hogan’s blind side and highly-touted sophomore Casey Tucker should fill in just fine at right tackle. This line struggled for most of last year but came together in a big way down the stretch — if it can retain that late-season form, McCaffrey and Hogan should have a big year.


It just isn’t realistic to think that the Stanford defense will fall off a cliff. So who do you expect to step forward on that side of the ball for the Cardinal? Can you walk us through the defenders you expect to emerge as big-time players in 2015?

The defensive line will determine whether or not Stanford’s defense will remain elite in 2015.

Solomon Thomas, the five-star crown jewel of Stanford’s 2014 recruiting class, was reportedly borderline unblockable in the spring, and alongside classmate Harrison Phillips, who put on 20 pounds this offseason, the defensive ends have tremendous upside but are still unproven. The ridiculous combination of Thomas’ size, agility and drive have the potential to make him one of the breakout defensive stars in not just the Pac-12, but the nation this year.

As the ESPN Pac-12 Blog said earlier this summer, though, the true make-or-break position on this line will be at nose tackle. There are currently zero nose tackles on Stanford’s roster, and the Cardinal will likely turn to senior DE Aziz Shittu to fill in at arguably the most important position in Stanford’s 3-4 defense. I don’t know if I necessarily expect Shittu to emerge as a star or not, but if Stanford’s defense is going to be successful, he’s going to need to have a big year.

Behind the line, expect linebacker Blake Martinez, last year’s leading tackler, to again be an underrated yet dominant run-stuffing force on the inside. And in Stanford’s revamped secondary, Kodi Whitfield, who transitioned from wide receiver to free safety, is poised for a huge year. He’s impressed just about everyone with how quickly he picked up the position, and as a converted offensive player, he’s going to have a leg up at locking on to opposing schemes and looks.

Don’t forget the last guy that switched from WR to DB at Stanford. You might have heard of him.


David Shaw is widely respected at the college level. His record since taking over for Jim Harbaugh speaks for itself. Yet last season, we finally heard some grumbling about Shaw’s performance—though mostly from Cardinal fans likely spoiled from these past few seasons.

That said, the Cardinal lost some games they maybe shouldn’t have (USC for one). Are some of the question marks (red zone playcalling, for one) just the product of a five-loss season, or has Shaw’s star lost a bit of its shine in recent years?

I’m surprised it took you so long to hear the Shaw discontent — Stanford fans have been grumbling about Shaw and his “overly conservative” playcalling since at least 2012. And, as you know, that came to a head last year when Shaw was the fans’ scapegoat for Stanford’s hilariously awful red-zone efficiency.

When you take a closer look at it, though, I don’t think Shaw’s play-calling has been the problem; his stubbornness is what has been holding him back a bit.

Shaw has always loved his run-first, methodical style in the red zone, and in Stanford’s run of dominance from 2012-14, he had the personnel to pull that off: The offensive line was stout and the running backs could find the holes and protect the ball well.

In 2015, Shaw tried to do the same with personnel that just couldn’t handle it. You can’t really blame Shaw for offensive line penalties, fumbles and missed field goals (all of which were much bigger problems than Shaw’s play-calling), but you could potentially blame him for not adjusting and continuing to put his players in those same positions to make the same mistakes over and over again. But even that might be a stretch.

The reality is that hindsight is always 20/20, and whenever something goes wrong, Stanford fans love to second-guess and point fingers — often at Shaw. They bashed him for throwing too much in the 2013 loss to Utah (despite the Utes’ strong run defense). And again for running too much in the Rose Bowl loss to Michigan State (despite Sparty’s ridiculous secondary). And again for punting twice from USC territory in the 2014 loss (even though our extremely unreliable kicker would have been kicking into a strong wind). If something goes wrong, whatever Shaw did, somebody will find a way to complain about it. He really can’t win in that situation.

With that in mind, I don’t think Shaw deserves all of the discontent that Stanford fans direct towards him. Also keep in mind that he runs a clean program and recruits extremely well given Stanford’s constraints. And as a Stanford graduate himself, he absolutely loves his job. I don’t really know what more you can ask for.


Notre Dame and Stanford are becoming quite a rivalry, and once again a regular-season finale could very well have postseason ramifications. The Irish have playoff hopes as they prepare to enter fall camp. What needs to happen for the Cardinal to be in the mix for a Pac-12 title and a spot in the CFB Playoff when Notre Dame comes to Palo Alto over Thanksgiving weekend?

Given the recent past, it’s really weird to think that the defense worries me much more than the offense does.

In general, Stanford’s key is to win the trenches. If the O-line reverts to early 2013 form, Hogan can’t be his efficient self. If the D-line doesn’t stuff the run and force pocket pressure, then the high-flying quarterbacks of the Pac-12 will decimate Stanford’s talented yet inexperienced secondary. Stanford’s offense is talented, but Hogan just doesn’t have the firepower to keep up in a shootout.

If the lines hold, though, the sky’s the limit for this Stanford team, and if it can win on the road at USC in Week 3, the secondary has time to develop further before Stanford’s other tough matchups (Arizona, Oregon, UCLA, Cal, Notre Dame — all at home). That USC game is key. If Stanford wins that, then I’ll be convinced that the defense is for real, and Oregon is the only obstacle between Stanford and a Pac-12 North title — and a legitimate shot at the playoff.

Five things we learned: Notre Dame 17, Stanford 14

Stanford v Notre Dame

Anatomy of a soul-crushing defeat: Back-breaking turnovers. Missed scoring opportunities. Wasted performances.

The Irish looked like they had put together the perfect recipe for a painful loss through 57 rain-soaked, wind-swept minutes in Notre Dame Stadium. But Everett Golson and the Irish offense rallied for a game-winning touchdown drive, helping the Irish pull off a wild 17-14 victory over Stanford Saturday afternoon.

RELATED: Watch a full replay of Notre Dame’s win

On a 4th down and 11 with the ballgame in the balance, Golson rolled to his left, spotting a wide-open Ben Koyack in the corner of the end zone.

“It felt like the whole thing happened in slow motion,” Golson said after the game. “I distinctly remember just looking at my first read and kind of rolling out and it was like real slow and I’m like, ‘Okay, he’s open, why are you not throwing it to him?'”

Golson did, and Koyack planted his feet just inside the chalk, cleanly catching the pass before getting knocked to the turf. It was another epic chapter in a Notre Dame-Stanford rivalry that continues to grow.

Combined with a dominant performance by Brian VanGorder’s defense, Notre Dame moves to 5-0, clearly positioned to do some damage in a College Football Playoff hunt that veered dramatically the first week of October.

Let’s take a look at the five things we learned in the Irish’s 17-14 victory over Stanford.

There was nobody left to bail Everett Golson out of trouble. So the quarterback seized the moment and did it himself. 

If Golson didn’t find Koyack in the corner of the end zone, it would’ve been the Irish quarterback wearing the goat horns. Golson was hassled and harassed all Saturday, completing just 20 of 43 throws for 241 yards, throwing for two touchdowns but gift-wrapping Stanford’s first score with a killer fumble and taking points off the board with a terrible decision on his interception to Jordan Richards.

But Golson battled his way back, seizing control of the Irish offense and putting together a game-winning drive for the ages.

“You know, he’s a winner,” head coach Brian Kelly said after the game. “I don’t know what his numbers are, but he’s 15-1 as a starter. I don’t know how many games he lost in high school but he didn’t lose many in high school either. So the kid’s a winner and he keeps competing and he keeps playing.”

That winning mindset helped Golson late in the game, seizing control of the moment when it mattered most.

“I mean I love moments like that. I really do,” Golson said after the game. “I think I see it more as an opportunity rather than pressure. It was a great opportunity for us to really just showcase what we have.”

Golson pulled off the game-winning drive without the help of a key backup quarterback, like he had in 2012. He also did it against a defense that had pummeled the Irish offensive line with pressures and blitzes, capably picked up on the games final drive when they weren’t earlier.

Clutch plays by a clutch player. And Notre Dame is 5-0 because of it.

Notre Dame’s defense outplayed the No. 1 defense in the country. 

Calling any defense the best in the country when half of their games were played against UC Davis and Army is a little silly. But Stanford’s defense lived up to its reputation, as its veteran front seven gave the Irish fits all evening. But Notre Dame’s defense played even better, with Brian VanGorder’s unit dialing up blitzes and schemes that held Stanford to some historically low numbers.

The Cardinal were held below 100 yards rushing for the first time since September 2012. They averaged just 3.0 yards per play, their lowest tally since 2006, when Walt Harris went 1-11. Notre Dame held Ty Montgomery to just 12 yards on four catches. He gained just 14 yards on five carries.

After the game, David Shaw tipped his cap to VanGorder.

“I think they’ve got an outstanding defensive coordinator. He mixes it up,” Shaw said. “Our quarterback got hit a lot today. Give them a lot of credit for their scheme… I think accounting for the guys they lost, they did outstanding on the defensive side, and their guys played hard. They played fast. And you can tell they’re very well coached because they’re running full speed where they’re supposed to be.”

In a game where Notre Dame needed to establish a running game, the Irish managed to put one together against Stanford. 

It was certainly tough sledding in the trenches. And on a Saturday where it was extremely difficult to throw the football, Notre Dame’s offense managed to keep Stanford’s defense honest with a running game.

The Irish officially ran for 129 yards on 32 carries, a more that respectable four yards a carry. Notre Dame got the big-chunk runs they needed from C.J. Prosise and Everett Golson. But they earned their keep in the trenches, with Cam McDaniel gaining 41 tough yards on 15 carries, the best looking 2.7 yards per touch you’ll ever see.

“If you just abandon the running game, they’re going to drop eight. They’re going to double out. You’ve got no chance,” Kelly said after the game. “So we have to keep their backers in the box. We had to have a semblance, and I thought we did a pretty good job of being patient and hanging in there.”

While some Irish fans still wanted to see more of Tarean Folston and Greg Bryant, it was the captain McDaniel who earned Kelly’s trust. And his ability to pinball loose in the trenches a few times and move the chains was key.

Just like in 2012 when Theo Riddick earned more carries while Cierre Wood was better statistically, Kelly showed once again that he values dependability over game-breaking ability, especially in a tight battle.

Stanford built a name on out-toughing their opponents. Jaylon Smith and the Irish defense won that battle on Saturday. 

Let’s take a minute to appreciate the game Jaylon Smith played. Notre Dame’s star linebacker made 14 tackles, seven unassisted. He notched a sack, one of his 2.5 tackles-for-loss. And he flew from sideline to sideline, playing the type of game you’d expect from a star in the making.

Smith may have paced the Irish defense, but he certainly wasn’t alone in his excellence. Notre Dame’s seven TFLs came from a variety of defenders. Sheldon Day continued his dominance in the trenches. Cody Riggs had six stops to go along with excellent coverage on Ty Montgomery for most of the night. Cole Luke played the best game of his career, adding a forced fumble to his two interceptions.

And Joe Schmidt, still tagged with the scrappy walk-on title hanging on him, had seven tackles, holding up just fine at the point of attack. Kelly talked about the all-out effort from his defense, holding the Irish in the game when the offense spent much of the day stuck in neutral.

“We’re getting great play from the front seven,” Kelly said. “Joe Schmidt, Jaylon, James Onwualu. I think if you look at the front seven, I think that’s where you start. And then we’re getting aggressive cornerback play. Two interceptions from Cole Luke. We’re playing without KeiVarae Russell who arguably was our best corner. We’re doing it with guys that are just stepping up and being aggressive on the outside.”

Asked if he was surprised that his defense — even after replacing NFL talents like Stephon Tuitt, Louis Nix, Prince Shembo, Dan Fox and Bennett Jackson — was able to go toe-to-toe with Stanford and win, Kelly didn’t blink.

“We’ve developed our program. We should be here in five years,” Kelly said. “This is where you evaluate your program in five years where year one we got knocked around. I mean, physically. And so this is where you should be going into year five of your program.”


After another memorable win against Stanford, it’s pretty easy to start seeing the stars align. 

Notre Dame’s big victory couldn’t have come at a better time. With Oregon, Alabama, Oklahoma and Texas A&M all going down, the Irish vaulted into a likely top-five spot by simply surviving. And while there’s certainly work to be done, Notre Dame’s in line to play a mid-October game in Tallahassee with some of the biggest stakes we’ve seen in recent years.

Of course, the pitfalls are there. But for as ugly as parts of Saturday’s 17-14 win looked, a deeper dig shows more promise than you might suspect. Notre Dame’s running game is getting better, with the rearranged offensive line playing better after a tough start. Chris Brown emerged as a viable receiving weapon, taking the pressure off of Will Fuller.

Defensively, shutting down Stanford is another datapoint that clears out any suspicious of smoke and mirrors. And with some resolution coming next week for Notre Dame’s five suspended players, getting any of that group back — especially projected starters DaVaris Daniels, KeiVarae Russell and Ishaq Williams — can only help.

After the game, sophomore Cole Luke talked about an attitude that’s taking over this young football team, allowing Luke and the rest of this young group to play really impressive football.

“One thing that was stressed to me before the game is that you have to have no fear,” Luke said. “It does not matter what receiver you are going against or what offense… When the lights come on and you are on the field, it does not really matter. You just have to make plays and play ball.”

With Stanford in the rearview mirror and North Carolina the next challenge ahead, don’t expect the Irish coaching staff to let this team look too far ahead. But it’s starting to feel a lot like 2012 again, in another season that seemingly came out of nowhere.


Live Blog — Notre Dame vs. Stanford

Stanford v Notre Dame

Fall weather came in a hurry. With temperatures in the mid-70s earlier this week and expected to be back there as of Monday, Stanford was welcomed to South Bend by temperatures hovering around 40 degrees, a stiff wind and rain all but assured this afternoon.

That weather could be familiar for the Cardinal and Irish, a forecast mighty close to the last time these two teams met in mid-October in South Bend. We’ll see if the results are the same in a few hours.

For those of you looking for a livestream of the game, here’s your link.

For those of you here for the live blog, see below. In a game that has the Cardinal currently favored by two points, the Irish will need to play their best football to make it to 5-0.