The good, the bad and the ugly: Notre Dame vs. Navy


For as exasperated as most Notre Dame fans were watching the Irish hang on for dear life (again!) against Navy, the response from the team and their coaches was much different. Facing a healthy Keenan Reynolds and a Navy team that picked themselves up off the mat and fought back after falling behind 28-7, there was no apology given for beating the Midshipmen 49-39 in a wild game Saturday night.

Nor should there have been.

That the Irish ended up in a dog fight after nearly burying the Midshipmen early was disappointing. But after injuries forced Brian VanGorder’s defense to dig deep into their reserves, that the Irish were able to stand strong in the fourth quarter after taking Navy’s best shot is a building block for November.

With Arizona State around the corner — a game with major playoff implications — it’s time to turn the page and forget about Saturday night’s struggle… at least until next year.

But before we can do that, let’s get to the good, bad and ugly of the Irish’s 10-point victory over Navy.



Starting fast. A key to victory for Notre Dame was getting out of the gate quickly. They certainly achieved that, scoring on a 78-yard touchdown pass to C.J. Prosise on the game’s second play and putting up touchdowns on the offense’s first four drives.

The Irish did that thanks to pinpoint passing by Everett Golson, great running by Tarean Folston, and excellent execution on third down. Even the defense played well, with Navy’s first touchdown coming on a pretty blatant push-off and Brian VanGorder’s defense able to force punts on Navy’s next two possessions.

It might have been downhill from here, but if you wanted the Irish to answer the bell, you couldn’t have been disappointed.


Everett Golson. Notre Dame’s quarterback was excellent on Saturday night. He was accurate throwing the football, and more importantly, threw the ball on time and in the rhythm of the offense.  Golson’s three touchown passes and 315 yards were only marred by a late second quarter interception, a throw that was the result of a miscommunication between Golson and Amir Carlisle, and a playcall Brian Kelly took the blame for.

Perhaps the thing I liked best about Golson was his ability to use his feet both to move the chains as well as to buy time in and outside of the pocket. His three rushing touchdowns came on just nine official carries, and while sack yardage took a hit on his totals, he was elusive and productive, especially in the red zone.


Tarean Folston. He was excellent on Saturday. Running for big yardage and making the type of reads and cuts that reward running backs with patience and vision. The Irish sophomore took over the No. 1 job just as Brian Kelly asked him to do, and reminded the staff of this every time they tried to give Cam McDaniel carries.

As I tweeted during the broadcast, everybody is a fan of McDaniel and the work he’s done as a leader both on and off the field. But he’s not even close to as productive of a back as Folston is, and against Arizona State the Irish absolutely need to ride Folston.

After struggling to put Navy away, the Irish turned the keys back over to Folston. He ran intelligently, then broke Navy’s back with a big play sneaking out of the backfield and converting the game-clincher on a 3rd-and-6 catch and run. (The officials marked him out at the 2-yard line. I’d have liked to see the replay.)


Responding Quickly. While we’re going to hammer the Irish for giving up the lead in the third quarter, it’s worth praising them for answering Navy’s lead almost immediately. Golson calmly led the Irish back down the field, converting a nice third down to Ben Koyack and marching down the field quickly. Golson capped the drive off with a much-needed touchdown.

From there, the Irish got a rare punt from Navy, and if you wondered whether Brian Kelly would feel like shortening the game and running some clock, you don’t know Notre Dame’s head coach. A big pass play down the field to Chris Brown hit on first down. And Tarean Folston dashed into the end zone for a 25-yard touchdown.

Just like that, the Irish were back up 42-31.


The Kids on Defense. No, they didn’t necessarily play all that well. But getting major snaps for guys like Greer Martini and Nyles Morgan is something that’s going to pay dividends in the future, and maybe even before 2015. The Irish defense will need Morgan to be ready for this weekend, with an Arizona State offense likely very happy that Joe Schmidt won’t be able to answer the bell.

But the fact that Martini, Morgan, James Onwualu, Jacob Matuska, Daniel Cage, Andrew Trumbetti, Drue Tranquill and a host of other kids had to play crucial minutes as the Irish were in a flat-spin out to sea (a little Top Gun imagery for the occasion) will be something that helps the program in the long run.

Keenan Reynolds and the Navy offense took advantage of the Irish youth on the field, but it’ll pay off in the future.


The other guys. While it wasn’t Will Fuller‘s best day at the office (he dropped a sure touchdown on a perfect throw by Golson), it was a good day for the complementary guys. Chris Brown had two big catches for 82 yards. Ben Koyack had a touchdown among his five catches for 54 yards. And C.J. Prosise made the game’s first big play, recovered a Navy onside kick, and had another big gainer on a jet sweep. Nice day at the office by the guys behind the guys.

Corey Robinson was quiet after a big game against Florida State. But the Irish passing game got things done from their supporting cast.



Special Teams. With two opportunities to ice the football game, kicker Kyle Brindza snap-hooked one miss and had another blocked. That’s another week with really shoddy execution when push came to shove on the field goal unit.

Perhaps it was out of respect of Ken Niumatalolo’s gambling ways, but when Navy punted, Notre Dame seemed fine with the fair catch. That limited Cody Riggs’ opportunity to get any return yards on his three attempts. But Riggs had another near disaster with ball security, dropping then recovering a muffed punt that could’ve given Navy the ball deep in Irish territory.

Both mistakes — missing field goals and muffing punt returns — are tight-rope acts that will burn the Irish sooner than later. And it’s something that needs to get cleaned up ASAP.


Letting Navy Back Into It. Things looked in perfect control. With just over seven minutes to go in the half, the Irish had Navy in a 2nd and long after Max Redfield made a nice breakup on a pass play.

But from there, the Midshipmen got after the Irish. Navy started to rip off big plays running to the boundary side of the field. That left an offensive tackle blocking a safety, nobody on the pitchman, and a three-man front to give up massive yardage. On two straight plays with a three-man front, Navy responded with gigantic gainers by the pitch man.

Navy used a counter option to get the Irish defense out of position, leading to another big play for a touchdown. Then came Notre Dame’s interception, a score on the first possession of the third quarter, and we had a ball game.

If you’re looking for a recipe on how to let an opponent back in, just pull up this 15 minutes of football whenever you’re wondering.


Injuries.  The loss of Schmidt is a killer. But if the injuries to Jarron Jones and Sheldon Day linger, the middle of the Irish defense could be really suspect at a time where they’re really needed.

We’ll hear more on Tuesday about the health of this football team. But another year and another costly injury loss against Navy.

Situational Defense. Writing RUSH DEFENSE in the bad column is kind of a joke, because it’s a mediocre observation you could make by simply looking at the box score. But if there was something really disappointing about the performance on the defensive side of the ball it was the lack of situational success the Irish had.

For as frustrating as Everett Golson’s interception was, it’s even more ridiculous that it turned into anything more than a missed opportunity. That Navy managed to get a receiver behind the Irish defense when everybody in the stadium knew they were throwing is ridiculous. Kelly mentioned that there was a collision between Drue Tranquill and Greer Martini, but that’s a back-breaking play that just can’t happen.

Also, the Irish were in great position to short-circuit Navy’s first offensive series of the second half when they had the Midshipmen backed up in 3rd-and-9. But once again, the Irish got beat to the short-side of the field on an option pitch play, moving the chains, keeping the drive alive and starting their rally.

Leading 28-24, Navy escaped after being in a 3rd-and-13, too. It turned into a 4th-and-2, and then one play later, Navy had the lead. You’re going to give up some yardage to Navy. That’s going to happen. But you can’t make critical, big-picture mistakes against the Midshipmen.


Sealing the Deal. For as good as Notre Dame’s offense looked early — the Irish had 215 yards in the first quarter — the Irish offense plain stunk when they had a chance to end the game without any more drama than necessary.

The kids on defense put Notre Dame in perfect position to end this game with ten minutes remaining. Already up 42-31, the Irish defense stopped Navy on a 4th-and-3 in their own territory, a huge stand by a group that had been picked on for the entire third quarter.

Well the offense laid an egg from there, with the offensive line unable to open anything up for Tarean Folston on first and second downs, and failed to convert on a 3rd-and-7 screen pass where the Irish really wanted to keep the clock running. Kyle Brindza’s snap hook gave the ball back to Navy with no harm done.

The very next series, Notre Dame’s defense made the play needed, intercepting Keenan Reynolds on an acrobatic play by Justin Utupo and quarterback pressure by Sheldon Day and James Onwualu. And again, the Irish offense stunk it up, this time missing a pass on first down, having McDaniel go for next to nothing on second down and the Irish failed to convert on third down. This time, Brindza’s field goal attempt was blocked after Matt Hegarty was steamrolled up the middle. Navy went down and scored a touchdown and converted the two-point play.

Two key opportunities to score points and end this game. Two critical misses by the Irish.


Quick Hits:

* Niumatalolo certainly has a feel for the dramatic. Last year, he went for the throat on a critical fourth down, calling for a reverse instead of being happy with getting a first down conversion. It burnt him. This year, Navy went for the jugular, with Noah Copeland attempting a throwback pass on 3rd-and-6 that Keenan Reynolds couldn’t reel in. While Jaylon Smith was in coverage, it was a ball that Reynolds probably should’ve had.

That’s two straight years where Navy’s big trick play didn’t connect. And two straight years where Notre Dame’s very happy they didn’t.

(Maybe Cody Riggs felt badly and decided to muff the punt out of pity. Or not.)

* I know Brian Kelly can’t wait to put the Navy files away until next year. But after talking about analytics last week and self-scouting, he and Brian VanGorder are going to want to stay out of three down linemen sets. With rare exception, they were disastrous.

* Time to spend a few plays working on the screen game. It was pretty shoddy after being an effective part of the offensive game plan against Florida State.

(And for those that looked twice at Golson’s throw to Chris Brown that was overturned on video replay after falling short, it was a bad job not just by Golson, but Ronnie Stanley, whose whiff on the block made it hard for Golson to step and throw.)



Wasn’t it all pretty ugly? After looking like a very good ugly through about the first 18 minutes, the Irish let Navy back in the game, a reminder to this young team that a killer instinct isn’t a part-time hobby.

But between the multiple injuries, a number of scares and a game that was competitive way longer than it should’ve been, it was your average, ugly game between Notre Dame and Navy.

For the faint of heart, take this Saturday off next fall and just check in on Sunday.

The lull of National Signing Day underscores need to move the early signing period

Getty Images

The early-morning chaos of today’s National Signing Day did not disappear with the implementation of the December “early” signing period in the 2018 recruiting cycle. It just moved six weeks earlier.

In 2014, waking up at 6:45 a.m. ET to be logged on and publishing at 7 a.m. led to noticing one expected recruit had not yet signed with Notre Dame by 8 a.m. Pointing that out and reminding the world Michigan State was making a late push led to an Irish media relations staffer reaching out to quietly say something to the extent of, “Just letting the young man have his moment at school.”

In 2017, less than two weeks after taking over this gig, waking up at 3 a.m. CT to churn through 2,000 words before signings could begin becoming official eventually led to napping through Brian Kelly’s Signing Day press conference.

Nothing changed 10 months later. That December, the afternoon of Dec. 22, the Friday before Christmas, was spent waiting for receiver Braden Lenzy to officially choose Notre Dame over Oregon. Sitting at your parents’ kitchen table not helping your niece make a gingerbread house because recruiting-obsessed fans harassed a player through two de-commitments is not a strong way to conjure up holiday spirit.

Coaches across the country advocated for the earlier signing period, claiming it would allow high-school seniors to make their collegiate decisions official earlier on in their senior years, particularly when the prospects had already made up their minds on where to play football at the next level. That was all optics, if even that.

These high schoolers now make their decision official just six weeks earlier. In the preps football calendar, those six weeks are meaningless. Both the December signing period and today, the traditional National Signing Day, come well after the high-school seasons have ended.

The truth was, coaches across the country did not want to tend to their solid commitments over Christmas and New Year’s, particularly not amid bowl prep. It was self-serving at best and short-sighted at worst.

First of all, when the December signing period became reality in 2017, one-time transfers were not yet allowed without losing eligibility the following season. Secondly, no one predicted the early signing period would lead to the coaching carousel beginning earlier and earlier in the season. September firings used to be the result of only off-field scandals, not outright expected from half a dozen programs each fall. Athletic directors now want that headstart on hiring a new coach so he can have time before the December signing period commences.

Exhibit A: Notre Dame may have ended up with Marcus Freeman as its head coach after Brian Kelly’s abrupt departure following the 2021 season, but if the primary signing date had not been lingering just a few weeks away, Kelly likely would not have jumped to LSU before the College Football Playoff field was set, and Irish director of athletics Jack Swarbrick would have taken more time in choosing his next head coach, more than the 48 hours he used last December. After all, Swarbrick took 10 days in hiring Kelly in 2009.

Lastly, with a 12-team Playoff coming in 2025, December will become only more hectic.

Those head coaches who wanted a little less stress over the holidays will then have to deal with, in chronological order:

— Keeping their own jobs.
— Securing their recruiting classes in the days immediately preceding Christmas.
— Preparing their teams for bowl games.
— Preparing their teams for up to four games if in the Playoff.
— Re-recruiting any players considering entering the transfer portal before the winter window closes.
— Winning a bowl game.
— Retaining their coaching staffs.
— Oh, and celebrate the holidays with their families, as was their want when they hollered for the early signing period.

Most of those tasks are immutable and inherent to the sport.

But one can move. It already has once.

The logic is too clear. Nothing was gained in moving up the primary signing date by six weeks. And sanity was lost.

This is, of course, a sport that prefers to ignore logic, but usually that is charming. A mustard bottle on the field is quirky; lacking a worthwhile voice of authority is stubbornly stupid.

So the early signing period may not move as soon as it should (now), but it will move. There are no anti-trust worries tied to it, fortunately.

And aside from the logic, cramming more content into December costs the media, too. Spreading out that context through the vacuum of mid-January to mid-March will be much appreciated.

Leftovers & Links: An early look at Notre Dame’s seven commits in the class of 2024, including QB CJ Carr


The traditional National Signing Day is this Wednesday, and for yet another year, Notre Dame has no intentions of inking any high-school recruits on the first Wednesday of February. The recruiting calendar has so changed that the Irish have not signed a recruit in February since 2021, when running back Logan Diggs pondered a late LSU push before doubling down on his Notre Dame commitment. Before that, not since 2019, when defensive end Isaiah Foskey publicly did so in order to be a part of his high school’s ceremonies.

Notre Dame turned its focus entirely onto the class of 2024 following December’s early signing period, when it inked a class of 24 players that ranks No. 9 in the country, per

Now with nearly 10 months to go before the next decision day to influence the narrative around Irish head coach Marcus Freeman’s recruiting focus, he already has pledges from seven players in the class of 2024. Class rankings this early in the cycle are rather meaningless, but for the sake of thoroughness, the Notre Dame class of 2024 is currently ranked No. 2 in the country, behind only Georgia with nine recruits pledged to date.

One player stands out among the early Irish seven. He stands out to such a degree this space broke from usual form when he committed in early June. To pull from that opening,

“This space has a general rule to not report on recruiting developments classes ahead of time. Worrying about the thoughts of high school seniors is enough of an oddity; focusing on juniors and underclassmen is outright absurd.

“But exceptions exist to prove rules, and Notre Dame landing the commitment of the No. 3 quarterback in the class of 2024 — prospects entering their junior years of high school — is such an exception.”

Consensus four-star quarterback CJ Carr is now only the No. 4 pro-style quarterback in the class and the No. 14 recruit overall, but he is the kind of key piece to a recruiting class that the Irish lacked in 2023, despite Freeman’s continued excellence hauling in defensive prospects. Carr has been an active and vocal recruiter on his own for Notre Dame, not an unusual occurrence from an early commit but a habit the Irish have not garnered out of a quarterback in quite some time. Even Tyler Buchner, due to both the pandemic and his own soft-spoken nature, was not the loudest campaigner among his peers.

RELATED READING: Notre Dame beats out Michigan for Lloyd Carr’s grandson, QB CJ Carr

At 6-foot-3, Carr looks the part of a prototypical quarterback, and his arm strength fits in line with that thought. He has downfield touch that would open up Notre Dame’s playbook in a way entirely unseen in 2022.

The other six early commitments to the Irish in the class of 2024 …

Consensus four-star running back Aneyas Williams (Hannibal High School; Mo.), ranked as the No. 1 all-purpose running back and No. 106 recruit in the class, per There will be many comparisons to former Notre Dame running back Kyren Williams when Aneyas Williams arrives on campus, and though they are from the same state, there is no relation. The younger Williams can do a bit of everything while his 5-foot-10 frame carries plenty of punch. He lacks truly elite speed, as Kyren did, but obviously that did not kept the elder Williams from cracking 1,000 yards in back-to-back seasons.

Consensus four-star receiver Cam Williams (Glenbard South H.S.; Glen Ellyn, Ill.), ranked as the No. 11 receiver and No. 102 recruit in the class: The Chicagoland product visited Iowa a handful of times and took looks at Michigan and Wisconsin, seemingly intent on staying in the Midwest. Williams has all the fundamentals wanted of a receiver, 6-foot-2 size combined with a comfort catching the ball. Time will reveal what part of his game, if any, develops into his specialty.

Consensus four-star tight end Jack Larsen (Charlotte Catholic; N.C.), ranked as the No. 7 tight end and No. 187 recruit in the class: Whether Larsen will be the next piece of “Tight End U” or not is a premature thought, but at 6-foot-3 and an ability to snag passes downfield over defenders, Larsen already looks the part. Credit a basketball background for that aerial ability.

Four-star offensive guard Peter Jones (Malvern Prep; Penn.), ranked as the No. 4 offensive guard and No. 99 recruit in the class: Jones plays tackle in high school, nearly an absolute requirement for any offensive line prospect chased by Irish offensive line coach Harry Hiestand, but his playing style suggests a future on the inside of the line.

Consensus four-star defensive tackle Owen Wafle (Hun School; Princeton, N.J.), ranked as the No. 10 defensive tackle in the class: Pronounced like playful, not waffle, Wafle should add weight to his 6-foot-3, 235-pound frame as he grows from a high-school junior into a college player. That may seem obvious, but the quality of that weight he adds in the next 20 months will be what most determines how quickly he can contribute in South Bend.

Consensus three-star cornerback Karson Hobbs (Archbishop Moeller; Cincinnati): Anyone committed right now has made a decision relatively early in the recruiting cycle, yet Hobbs was committed to South Carolina for three months before he flipped to Notre Dame in early November. Seeking out a committed three-star more than a year before he can officially sign may strike one as foolish, but Irish cornerbacks coach Mike Mickens has earned some leeway in his evaluations, given the early impacts of Benjamin Morrison and Jaden Mickey in 2022.

Ohio State, Clemson & Pittsburgh hurt most by early NFL draft entrants among Notre Dame’s opponents
40 Preseason Predictions Revisited, part I: Notre Dame’s rushing offense hid many early struggles
Part II: Notre Dame’s upset losses should have been expected from a first-year head coach
Part III: Notre Dame’s November far from the expected disappointment
Part IV: Notre Dame’s 2022 ended where it was always expected to

How QB Sam Hartman found trouble with turnovers in 2022
College QB Austin Reed got transfer portal offers comparable to late-round NFL draft picks
I requested my Notre Dame admissions file
Boston College, offensive coordinator John McNulty parting ways after 2022 struggles
Hamlin’s injury highlights precarious position of many young N.F.L. players
On the Broncos’ head-coaching finalists
Bally Sports RSNs headed for bankruptcy
Auditor: LSU overpaid Brian Kelly by more than $1M in 2022

40 Preseason Predictions Revisited, part IV: Notre Dame’s 2022 ended where it was always expected to

TaxSlayer Gator Bowl - Notre Dame v South Carolina
Getty Images

Notre Dame did not get there in any way expected, but the Irish season ended about where anticipated in the preseason. Psychological studies could spend hours disagreeing if it would have been better for Notre Dame to go 10-3 with its three losses coming to three top-10 teams or if a 9-4 season with a top-10 upset is better for Marcus Freeman’s program in the long-term.

But either scenario was going to end with the Irish in the Gator Bowl, a likelihood as far back as August.

To finish this recap of 40 preseason predictions

32) “A freshman defensive back will intercept a pass this season, becoming just the second freshman to do so” since 2017. Notre Dame’s defensive backfields have been far from liabilities during this resurgence since the 2016 faceplant, but they have lacked young playmakers, Kyle Hamilton aside.

Enter Benjamin Morrison and not one, not two, not three … but six interceptions in his freshman season. Unfortunately for your prognosticator, that does not equal six correct predictions. (15.5/32)

33) “The spread when the Irish visit the Trojans will be more than a field goal but less than a touchdown.” And indeed, USC was favored by four when Notre Dame visited the weekend after Thanksgiving, in what may have been the last visit the weekend after Thanksgiving. Logic says the Irish and Trojans will continue playing regularly, but USC’s joining the Big Ten in 2024 could change the timing of the meetings, and NCAA rule changes have removed Notre Dame’s want to be on the West Coast that particular week.

The Irish used to disperse their coaches from Washington to Arizona to recruit the Pacific time zone immediately after the season-ending game in California. In a literal sense, it saved those coaches 12-24 hours to not have to travel to Seattle or Phoenix from South Bend, particularly vital in a crucial recruiting window.

But now, the days after Thanksgiving are a dead period, so the coaches cannot make those visits. They flew back with the team this year.

Combine that with the Big Ten flux and perhaps Notre Dame starts heading to USC at a different point in the calendar in 2024. (16.5/33)

34) “USC will not make the College Football Playoff.”

Between this, suggesting Ohio State would make the Playoff and mistakenly thinking Clemson would, as well, these preseason predictions accurately predicted the season conclusions for two of the three biggest Irish opponents in 2022. Already suspect the 2023 version will include none of the three making the Playoff. (17.5/34)

35) Sophomore receiver Lorenzo Styles’ disappointing 2022 — 30 catches for 340 yards and one touchdown — cost him any semblance of NFL draft buzz a year before he is eligible for the draft. A breakout 2023 would obviously change that, but that was not the prediction. (17.5/35)

36) Blake Grupe fell two makes short of the predicted 80 percent field-goal rate, finishing at 73.7 percent on 14-of-19. A career 74.4 percent kicker before he arrived at Notre Dame, the Arkansas State graduate transfer’s 2022 fell in line with his career. (17.5/36)

37) Arguing Notre Dame would score fewer than 32.8 points per game in 2022 was based on the lack of depth at receiver, subsequently underscored by Styles’ struggles. Expecting the Irish to slow things down made a lower-scoring season a strong thought, though perhaps not as low as the 31.4 scored per game in 2018, the low of the last six years.

Notre Dame threaded that needle with 31.8 points per game, a number buoyed, though not shockingly, by the punt-block unit and Morrison’s contributions. (18.5/37)

38) The Irish had gone 54-10 in Brian Kelly’s final five years in South Bend, winning at least 10 games each year. Predicting a sixth season of double-digit wins was a mistake largely thanks to Audric Estimé’s fumble in the fourth quarter against Stanford. (18.5/38)

39) This final stretch of predictions focused on hitting a few tight windows. The spread against USC, the exact scoring average and … where Notre Dame would play in a bowl game.

“Notre Dame will play in Florida before New Year’s.”

As complicated as bowl scenarios get during the season and then even the week of selections with the Holiday Bowl in San Diego reportedly campaigning hard for the Irish, sticking with initial expectations would have been a smart travel-planning strategy. (19.5/39)



40 Preseason Predictions Revisited, part I: Notre Dame’s rushing offense hid many early struggles
Part II: Notre Dame’s upset losses should have been expected from a first-year head coach
Part III: Notre Dame’s November far from the expected disappointment

40 Preseason Predictions Revisited, part III: Notre Dame’s November far from the expected disappointment

Clemson v Notre Dame
Getty Images

Recapping these preseason predictions bit by bit has emphasized how much of a see-saw Notre Dame’s 2022 was. They expected decent Irish success at Ohio State to open the season, which was realized. They then plainly assumed Notre Dame would continue to wallop overmatched opponents as Brian Kelly made the default.

Instead, Marcus Freeman stubbed his toe twice as first-year head coaches are wont to do, rendering that stretch of predictions largely flawed.

Now, the predictions tilt into early November, expecting little from the Irish. Of course, that was exactly when Freeman delivered the defining moment of his debut campaign.

21) “Notre Dame will top last year’s 41 sacks, which was a Kelly Era high. The Ademilola twins, junior defensive end Rylie Mills and at least one linebacker will each make at least three sacks.”

The first part of that fell inarguably short, 38 clearly less than 41. But the next sentence held more merit. Defensive end Justin Ademiloa and twin brother tackle Jayson Ademilola each had three sacks while Mills added 3.5. No linebacker reached three unless willing to still count Jordan Botelho as a linebacker with his 4.5 sacks. Given two of those came in the Gator Bowl when Botelho was clearly a defensive end, that would be generous grading. Instead, this entire prediction should be considered wrong, alas. (12/21)

22) Did this space continue publishing as planned after the Minnesota Timberwolves home opener? The running content calendar says a “Leftovers & Links” column ran on Oct. 20, the day after. Take the wins where you can find them, especially as a Timberwolves fan. (13/22)

23) The Irish had won 25 straight regular-season games against ACC opponents entering the season. Predicting that would reach 27 meant predicting Notre Dame would beat North Carolina and Syracuse. Check and check. (14/23)

24) That did not push the Irish into the top 10 of the initial College Football Playoff rankings, as predicted, thanks to the mishaps against Marshall and Stanford. (14/24)

25) And here comes a stretch of predictions predicated in pessimism, focused on how Notre Dame would fare against Clemson. The Irish had won 16 straight games in November entering the 2022 season. Suggesting that would end at 16 was suggesting Notre Dame would lose to Clemson on the first weekend of November.

Rather, that was the win in Freeman’s first season that will be long remembered. (14/25)

26) That expected loss was based on Clemson’s defensive front holding Notre Dame’s ground game in check. There was no expectation the Irish would dominate there with 264 rushing yards on 46 carries after adjusting for a single one-yard sack. Logan Diggs ran for 114 yards on 17 carries while Audric Estimé took 18 rushes for 104 yards. (14/26)

27) That loss did not knock Clemson out of the College Football Playoff. The Tigers messing around and finding out against South Carolina did that. But regardless, predicting Clemson would return to the Playoff was ill-fated. (14/27)

28) Notre Dame was 30-1 in its last 31 home games entering the season. Predicting that would reach 35-2 in step with suggesting the Irish would lose to the Tigers was wrong in all sorts of ways, most notably in that the stretch is now 34-3 after Notre Dame went just 4-2 at home last season. Again, Marshall and Stanford. (14/28)

29) Boston College receiver Zay Flowers did not have the predicted 40-yard catch on Senior Day at Notre Dame Stadium. He had a long of 39 yards on a snow-covered field playing with a backup quarterback.

The spirit of the prognostication was valid, but alas. (14/29)

30) Former Irish tight end George Takacs did not catch a touchdown in his return with the Eagles. No one did. (14/30)

31) And former Notre Dame quarterback Phil Jurkovec did not have a “perfectly adequate day in his return to South Bend, not dramatic enough in any regard to confirm or deny anyone’s expectations for him that day.”

Jurkovec did not play at all, so let’s call this wager a push. He did, however, make some headlines from the sideline.

There is a strong chance this prediction is rerun in its entirety in 2023 with Jurkovec and Pittsburgh heading to South Bend on Oct. 28. (14.5/31)